University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Memphis, Tennessee.
University of Tennessee West Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memphis, Tennessee.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jul-Aug;8(4):275-278. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 24.
The purpose of this study was to survey the accessibility and quality of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening information from National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer center and public health organization Web sites.
We surveyed the December 1, 2016, version of all 63 NCI-designated cancer center public Web sites and 5 major online clearinghouses from allied public/private organizations (cancer.gov, cancer.org, PCF.org, USPSTF.org, and CDC.gov). Web sites were analyzed according to a 50-item list of validated health care information quality measures. Web sites were graded by 2 blinded reviewers. Interrater agreement was confirmed by Cohen kappa coefficient.
Ninety percent of Web sites addressed PSA screening. Cancer center sites covered 45% of topics surveyed, whereas organization Web sites addressed 70%. All organizational Web pages addressed the possibility of false-positive screening results; 41% of cancer center Web pages did not. Forty percent of cancer center Web pages also did not discuss next steps if a PSA test was positive. Only 6% of cancer center Web pages were rated by our reviewers as "superior" (eg, addressing >75% of the surveyed topics) versus 20% of organizational Web pages. Interrater agreement between our reviewers was high (kappa coefficient = 0.602).
NCI-designated cancer center Web sites publish lower quality public information about PSA screening than sites run by major allied organizations. Nonetheless, information and communication deficiencies were observed across all surveyed sites. In an age of increasing patient consumerism, prospective prostate cancer patients would benefit from improved online PSA screening information from provider and advocacy organizations. Validated cancer patient Web educational standards remain an important, understudied priority.
本研究旨在调查美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)癌症中心和公共卫生组织网站提供的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查信息的可及性和质量。
我们调查了 2016 年 12 月 1 日所有 63 个 NCI 指定癌症中心公共网站和 5 个主要在线联合公共/私营组织(cancer.gov、cancer.org、PCF.org、USPSTF.org 和 CDC.gov)的版本。根据 50 项经验证的医疗保健信息质量措施清单对网站进行了分析。网站由 2 名盲审员进行评分。通过 Cohen kappa 系数确认了评分者间的一致性。
90%的网站涉及 PSA 筛查。癌症中心网站涵盖了调查中 45%的主题,而组织网站则涵盖了 70%的主题。所有组织网站都提到了假阳性筛查结果的可能性;而 41%的癌症中心网站并未提及。40%的癌症中心网站也未讨论如果 PSA 检测呈阳性,下一步该怎么做。只有 6%的癌症中心网站被我们的评审员评为“优秀”(例如,涉及调查主题的>75%),而组织网站的这一比例为 20%。我们的评审员之间的评分者间一致性很高(kappa 系数=0.602)。
与主要联合组织运营的网站相比,NCI 指定的癌症中心网站发布的关于 PSA 筛查的公共信息质量较低。尽管如此,所有调查网站都存在信息和沟通方面的不足。在患者消费者意识不断增强的时代,预期的前列腺癌患者将受益于来自医疗机构和宣传组织的改进后的在线 PSA 筛查信息。经证实的癌症患者网络教育标准仍然是一个重要但研究不足的优先事项。