Wood Fred B, Benson Dennis, LaCroix Eve-Marie, Siegel Elliot R, Fariss Susan
Office of Health Information Programs Development, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Jul 1;7(3):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.3.e31.
The transition to a largely Internet and Web-based environment for dissemination of health information has changed the health information landscape and the framework for evaluation of such activities. A multidimensional evaluative approach is needed.
This paper discusses one important dimension of Web evaluation-usage data. In particular, we discuss the collection and analysis of external data on website usage in order to develop a better understanding of the health information (and related US government information) market space, and to estimate the market share or relative levels of usage for National Library of Medicine (NLM) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) websites compared to other health information providers.
The primary method presented is Internet audience measurement based on Web usage by external panels of users and assembled by private vendors-in this case, comScore. A secondary method discussed is Web usage based on Web log software data. The principle metrics for both methods are unique visitors and total pages downloaded per month.
NLM websites (primarily MedlinePlus and PubMed) account for 55% to 80% of total NIH website usage depending on the metric used. In turn, NIH.gov top-level domain usage (inclusive of NLM) ranks second only behind WebMD in the US domestic home health information market and ranks first on a global basis. NIH.gov consistently ranks among the top three or four US government top-level domains based on global Web usage. On a site-specific basis, the top health information websites in terms of global usage appear to be WebMD, MSN Health, PubMed, Yahoo! Health, AOL Health, and MedlinePlus. Based on MedlinePlus Web log data and external Internet audience measurement data, the three most heavily used cancer-centric websites appear to be www.cancer.gov (National Cancer Institute), www.cancer.org (American Cancer Society), and www.breastcancer.org (non-profit organization).
Internet audience measurement has proven useful to NLM, with significant advantages compared to sole reliance on usage data from Web log software. Internet audience data has helped NLM better understand the relative usage of NLM and NIH websites in the intersection of the health information and US government information market sectors, which is the primary market intersector for NLM and NIH. However important, Web usage is only one dimension of a complete Web evaluation framework, and other primary research methods, such as online user surveys, usability tests, and focus groups, are also important for comprehensive evaluation that includes qualitative elements, such as user satisfaction and user friendliness, as well as quantitative indicators of website usage.
向主要基于互联网和网络的健康信息传播环境的转变,改变了健康信息格局以及此类活动的评估框架。需要一种多维度的评估方法。
本文讨论网络评估的一个重要维度——使用数据。具体而言,我们讨论网站使用外部数据的收集与分析,以便更好地了解健康信息(以及相关美国政府信息)市场空间,并估计国立医学图书馆(NLM)和国立卫生研究院(NIH)网站相对于其他健康信息提供者的市场份额或相对使用水平。
所介绍的主要方法是基于用户外部小组的网络使用情况并由私人供应商(在本案例中为comScore)汇总的互联网受众测量。所讨论的次要方法是基于网络日志软件数据的网络使用情况。这两种方法的主要指标都是独立访客数和每月下载的总页面数。
根据所使用的指标,NLM网站(主要是MedlinePlus和PubMed)占NIH网站总使用量的55%至80%。反过来,在美国国内家庭健康信息市场中,NIH.gov顶级域名的使用量(包括NLM)仅次于WebMD排名第二,在全球范围内排名第一。基于全球网络使用情况,NIH.gov一直位列美国政府顶级域名的前三四名。就特定网站而言,全球使用量排名靠前的健康信息网站似乎是WebMD、MSN Health、PubMed、雅虎健康、美国在线健康和MedlinePlus。根据MedlinePlus网络日志数据和外部互联网受众测量数据,使用量最大的三个以癌症为中心的网站似乎是www.cancer.gov(国立癌症研究所)、www.cancer.org(美国癌症协会)和www.breastcancer.org(非营利组织)。
事实证明,互联网受众测量对NLM很有用,与单纯依赖网络日志软件的使用数据相比具有显著优势。互联网受众数据帮助NLM更好地了解NLM和NIH网站在健康信息和美国政府信息市场领域交叉点的相对使用情况,这是NLM和NIH的主要跨部门市场。尽管网络使用情况很重要,但它只是完整网络评估框架的一个维度,其他主要研究方法,如在线用户调查、可用性测试和焦点小组,对于包括用户满意度和用户友好性等定性元素以及网站使用量定量指标的综合评估也很重要。