Doctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 23-27 Kazinczy utca, 1075 Budapest, Hungary; Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 46 Izabella utca, 1064 Budapest, Hungary.
Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 46 Izabella utca, 1064 Budapest, Hungary.
Addict Behav. 2018 Jun;81:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
Caffeine is a common psychoactive substance with a documented addictive potential. Caffeine withdrawal has been included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), but caffeine use disorder (CUD) is considered to be a condition for further study. The aim of the current study is (1) to test the psychometric properties of the Caffeine Use Disorder Questionnaire (CUDQ) by using a confirmatory factor analysis and an item response theory (IRT) approach, (2) to compare IRT models with varying numbers of parameters and models with or without caffeine consumption criteria, and (3) to examine if the total daily caffeine consumption and the use of different caffeinated products can predict the magnitude of CUD symptomatology.
A cross-sectional study was conducted on an adult sample (N = 2259). Participants answered several questions regarding their caffeine consumption habits and completed the CUDQ, which incorporates the nine proposed criteria of the DSM-5 as well as one additional item regarding the suffering caused by the symptoms.
Factor analyses demonstrated the unidimensionality of the CUDQ. The suffering criterion had the highest discriminative value at a higher degree of latent trait. The criterion of failure to fulfill obligations and social/interpersonal problems discriminate only at the higher value of CUD latent factor, while endorsement the consumption of more caffeine or longer than intended and craving criteria were discriminative at a lower level of CUD. Total daily caffeine intake was related to a higher level of CUD. Daily coffee, energy drink, and cola intake as dummy variables were associated with the presence of more CUD symptoms, while daily tea consumption as a dummy variable was related to less CUD symptoms. Regular smoking was associated with more CUD symptoms, which was explained by a larger caffeine consumption.
The IRT approach helped to determine which CUD symptoms indicate more severity and have a greater discriminative value. The level of CUD is influenced by the type and quantity of caffeine consumption.
咖啡因是一种常见的具有潜在成瘾性的精神活性物质。咖啡因戒断已被纳入《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5),但咖啡因使用障碍(CUD)被认为是一种需要进一步研究的疾病。本研究的目的是:(1)使用验证性因子分析和项目反应理论(IRT)方法测试咖啡因使用障碍问卷(CUDQ)的心理测量特性;(2)比较具有不同参数数量的 IRT 模型和具有或不具有咖啡因消费标准的模型;(3)检验总咖啡因日摄入量和不同含咖啡因产品的使用是否可以预测 CUD 症状的严重程度。
对一个成年样本(N=2259)进行了横断面研究。参与者回答了一些关于他们咖啡因消费习惯的问题,并完成了 CUDQ,该问卷包含了 DSM-5 的九个建议标准,以及一个关于症状引起的痛苦的附加项目。
因子分析表明 CUDQ 的单维度性。在更高的潜在特质水平上,痛苦标准具有最高的鉴别价值。未能履行义务和社会/人际关系问题的标准仅在 CUD 潜在因素的较高值上具有鉴别力,而摄入更多咖啡因或比预期时间更长以及渴望标准在 CUD 的较低水平上具有鉴别力。总咖啡因日摄入量与 CUD 水平较高有关。作为虚拟变量的每日咖啡、能量饮料和可乐摄入量与更多 CUD 症状的存在有关,而作为虚拟变量的每日茶摄入量与较少的 CUD 症状有关。有规律的吸烟与更多的 CUD 症状有关,这可以用更大的咖啡因摄入量来解释。
IRT 方法有助于确定哪些 CUD 症状表明更严重,具有更大的鉴别价值。CUD 的水平受咖啡因的类型和数量的影响。