• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-DE)德语版的系统开发和调整。

Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE).

机构信息

Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Feb 17;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0283-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-018-0283-7
PMID:29454343
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5816386/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators tool (SPICT) supports the identification of patients with potential palliative care (PC) needs. An Austrian-German expert group translated SPICT into German (SPICT-DE) in 2014. The aim of this study was the systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE for its application in primary care (general practice).

METHODS

SPICT-DE was developed by a multiprofessional research team according to the TRAPD model: translation, review, adjudication, pretesting and documentation. In a pretest, five general practitioners (GPs) rated four case vignettes of patients with different PC needs. GPs were asked to assess whether each patient might benefit from PC or not (I) based on their subjective appraisal ("usual practice") and (II) by using SPICT-DE. After further refinement, two focus groups with 28 GPs (68% with a further qualification in PC) were conducted to test SPICT-DE. Again, participants rated two selected case vignettes (I) based on their subjective appraisal and (II) by using SPICT-DE. Afterwards, participants reflected the suitability of SPICT-DE for use in their daily practice routine within the German primary care system. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for small samples. Qualitative data were analysed by conventional content analysis. Focus group discussion was analysed combining formal and conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to the spontaneous rating of the case vignettes based on subjective appraisal, participants in both the pretest and the focus groups considered PC more often as being beneficial for the patients described in the case vignettes when using SPICT-DE. Participants in the focus groups agreed that SPICT-DE includes all relevant indicators necessary for an adequate clinical identification of patients who might benefit from PC.

CONCLUSIONS

SPICT-DE supports the identification of patients who might benefit from PC and seems suitable for routine application in general practice in Germany. The systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE in this study was successfully completed by using a multiprofessional and participatory approach.

摘要

背景

支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT)支持识别有潜在姑息治疗(PC)需求的患者。一个奥地利-德国专家组于 2014 年将 SPICT 翻译为德文(SPICT-DE)。本研究的目的是系统地开发、完善和测试 SPICT-DE,以便在初级保健(全科医学)中应用。

方法

SPICT-DE 由多专业研究团队根据 TRAPD 模型开发:翻译、审查、裁决、预测试和文件记录。在预测试中,五名全科医生(GP)对四种不同 PC 需求的患者案例进行了评分。要求 GP 基于主观评估(“常规做法”)和(II)使用 SPICT-DE,评估每位患者是否可能受益于 PC。经过进一步完善,对 28 名全科医生(68%有进一步的 PC 资格)进行了两次焦点小组测试,以测试 SPICT-DE。同样,参与者根据主观评估(I)和(II)使用 SPICT-DE 对两个选定的案例进行了评分。之后,参与者反思了 SPICT-DE 在德国初级保健系统常规实践中的适用性。定量数据采用描述性统计和小样本非参数检验进行分析。定性数据采用常规内容分析法进行分析。焦点小组讨论分析结合了形式和常规内容分析。

结果

与基于主观评估的案例评分相比,预测试和焦点小组的参与者在使用 SPICT-DE 时,更多地认为案例中描述的患者接受 PC 治疗更有益。焦点小组的参与者一致认为,SPICT-DE 包含了所有必要的指标,用于充分识别可能受益于 PC 的患者。

结论

SPICT-DE 支持识别可能受益于 PC 的患者,似乎适合在德国的常规实践中应用。本研究采用多专业和参与式方法成功完成了 SPICT-DE 的系统开发、完善和测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f505/5816386/2a9cdc573bb7/12904_2018_283_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f505/5816386/2a9cdc573bb7/12904_2018_283_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f505/5816386/2a9cdc573bb7/12904_2018_283_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE).支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-DE)德语版的系统开发和调整。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Feb 17;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0283-7.
2
Systematic identification of critically ill and dying patients in primary care using the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE).使用德国版支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-DE)在初级保健中系统识别危重症和临终患者。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Feb 3;18:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/000278. eCollection 2020.
3
Early integration of palliative care: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and content validity of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in a Swedish healthcare context.早期姑息治疗的整合:支持性和姑息治疗指标工具在瑞典医疗保健环境中的翻译、跨文化调适和内容效度。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Sep;34(3):762-771. doi: 10.1111/scs.12781. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
4
Structured implementation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in general practice - A prospective interventional study with follow-up.在一般实践中结构化实施支持和姑息治疗指标工具 - 一项具有随访的前瞻性干预研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 1;21(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01107-y.
5
Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version.支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT™):意大利语版本的内容效度、可行性和预测试。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jun 6;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00584-3.
6
Systematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS).支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-LIS)泰语版在低收入环境下的系统适应性调整。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Feb 19;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00729-y.
7
Optimal care at the end of life (OPAL): study protocol of a prospective interventional mixed-methods study with pretest-posttest-design in a primary health care setting considering the view of general practitioners, relatives of deceased patients and health care stakeholders.终末期最佳护理(OPAL):一项在初级医疗保健环境中进行的前瞻性干预性混合方法研究的研究方案,考虑到全科医生、已故患者亲属和医疗保健利益相关者的观点,采用预测试后设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4321-9.
8
Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™) in a Danish healthcare context: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and content validation.支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT™)在丹麦医疗保健环境中的应用:翻译、跨文化调适和内容验证。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Mar 24;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00931-6.
9
Palliative Care in the Community: The Greek Version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™).社区中的缓和医疗:支持和缓和医疗指标工具(SPICT™)的希腊语版本。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241245842. doi: 10.1177/21501319241245842.
10
Cultural adaptation and validation of the SPICT-ES™ instrument to identify palliative care needs in Chilean older adults.文化调适与验证 SPICT-ES™ 工具以识别智利老年群体的缓和医疗需求。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 16;21(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01111-2.

引用本文的文献

1
From MINI to Meaningful Change-A German Pilot Study to Improve Patient Outcomes in End-of-Life Care.从MINI到有意义的改变——一项旨在改善临终关怀患者结局的德国试点研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 16;13(16):2024. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162024.
2
The 'Surprise' Question in Haemato-Oncology: The Estimating Physician and Time to Death Reduce the Prognostic Uncertainty-An Observational Study.血液肿瘤学中的“意外”问题:评估医生与死亡时间可降低预后不确定性——一项观察性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;17(8):1326. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081326.
3
Validation of the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) Tool in Germany.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in a Geriatric Population.支持性和姑息治疗指标工具在老年人群中的验证。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):220-224. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0205. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
2
[Living and dying with frailty : Qualitative interviews with elderly people in the domestic environment].[与脆弱相伴的生死:对居家老年人的定性访谈]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Feb;50(2):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s00391-015-1011-z. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
3
[Generalist palliative care for non-cancer patients: A review article].
姑息治疗与快速急诊筛查(P-CaRES)工具在德国的验证。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 23;14(7):2191. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072191.
4
Adaptation of the Taiwan Version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-TW) and Its Association with Six-Month Mortality: A Multi-Center Validation Study in Older People.台湾版支持性与姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-TW)的改编及其与六个月死亡率的关联:一项针对老年人的多中心验证研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 1;12(21):2185. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212185.
5
A refined ICD-10 diagnoses-based approach for retrospective analysis of potential palliative care need and coverage in claims data of deceased.一种基于国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)诊断的精细方法,用于对已故者索赔数据中潜在姑息治疗需求和覆盖情况进行回顾性分析。
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Aug 13;12:20503121241269599. doi: 10.1177/20503121241269599. eCollection 2024.
6
Evaluating palliative care case conferences in primary care for patients with advanced non-malignant chronic conditions: a cluster-randomised controlled trial (KOPAL).评估初级保健中针对晚期非恶性慢性疾病患者的姑息治疗病例会议:一项集群随机对照试验(KOPAL)。
Age Ageing. 2024 May 1;53(5). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae100.
7
Use of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™) for end-of-life discussions: a scoping review.使用支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT™)进行临终讨论:范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 May 16;23(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01445-z.
8
End-of-life care in Germany between 2016 and 2020 - A repeated cross-sectional analysis of statutory health insurance data.2016 年至 2020 年德国的终末期关怀 - 法定健康保险数据的重复横断面分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 20;23(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01387-6.
9
Palliative Care in the Community: The Greek Version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™).社区中的缓和医疗:支持和缓和医疗指标工具(SPICT™)的希腊语版本。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241245842. doi: 10.1177/21501319241245842.
10
Screening instruments for early identification of unmet palliative care needs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.筛查工具用于早期识别未满足的姑息治疗需求:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 19;14(3):256-268. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004465.
[非癌症患者的全科姑息治疗:一篇综述文章]
Schmerz. 2015 Dec;29(6):604-15. doi: 10.1007/s00482-015-0054-9.
4
What Diagnostic Tools Exist for the Early Identification of Palliative Care Patients in General Practice? A systematic review.在全科医疗中,有哪些诊断工具可用于早期识别姑息治疗患者?一项系统综述。
J Palliat Care. 2015;31(2):118-23. doi: 10.1177/082585971503100208.
5
The health care cost of dying: a population-based retrospective cohort study of the last year of life in Ontario, Canada.临终医疗费用:一项基于加拿大安大略省人群的生命最后一年回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0121759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121759. eCollection 2015.
6
Hospital rapid response team and patients with life-limiting illness: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.医院快速反应小组与患有危及生命疾病的患者:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2015 Apr;29(4):302-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216314560802. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
Promoting palliative care in the community: production of the primary palliative care toolkit by the European Association of Palliative Care Taskforce in primary palliative care.在社区推广姑息治疗:欧洲姑息治疗协会初级姑息治疗特别工作组编制初级姑息治疗工具包
Palliat Med. 2015 Feb;29(2):101-11. doi: 10.1177/0269216314545006. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
8
What tools are available to identify patients with palliative care needs in primary care: a systematic literature review and survey of European practice.在初级保健中识别有姑息治疗需求患者的可用工具:一项系统的文献综述及欧洲实践调查
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013 Dec;3(4):444-51. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000527.
9
Can palliative care reduce futile treatment? A systematic review.姑息治疗能否减少无效治疗?一项系统评价。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013 Dec;3(4):389-98. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000343. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
10
The challenges of uncertainty and interprofessional collaboration in palliative care for non-cancer patients in the community: a systematic review of views from patients, carers and health-care professionals.社区非癌症患者姑息治疗中不确定性和跨专业协作的挑战:对患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员观点的系统评价
Palliat Med. 2014 Oct;28(9):1081-98. doi: 10.1177/0269216314531999. Epub 2014 May 12.