• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持性和姑息治疗指标工具在老年人群中的验证。

Validation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in a Geriatric Population.

机构信息

1 Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium .

2 Department of Geriatrics, Ghent University Hospital , Ghent, Belgium .

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):220-224. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0205. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2017.0205
PMID:28792787
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Timely identification of patients in need of palliative care is especially challenging in a geriatric population because of prognostic uncertainty. The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) aims at facilitating this identification, yet has not been validated in a geriatric population.

OBJECTIVE

This study validates the SPICT in a geriatric patient population admitted to the hospital.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Subject were patients admitted to the acute geriatric ward of a Belgian university hospital between January 1 and June 30, 2014.

MEASUREMENTS

Data including demographics, functional status, comorbidities, treatment limitation decision (TLD), and one-year mortality were collected. SPICT was measured retrospectively by an independent assessor.

RESULTS

Out of 435 included patients, 54.7% had a positive SPICT, using a cut-off value of 2 for the general indicators and a cut-off value of 1 for the clinical questions. SPICT-positive patients were older (p = 0.033), more frequently male (p = 0.028), and had more comorbidities (p = 0.015) than SPICT-negative patients. The overall one-year mortality was 32.2%, 48.7% in SPICT-positive patients, and 11.5% in SPICT-negative patients (p < 0.001). SPICT predicted one-year mortality with a sensitivity of 0.841 and a specificity of 0.579. The area under the curve of the general indicators (0.758) and the clinical indicators of SPICT (0.748) did not differ (p = 0.638). In 71.4% of SPICT-positive cases, a TLD was present versus 26.9% in SPICT-negative cases (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SPICT seems to be valuable for identifying geriatric patients in need of palliative care as it demonstrates significant association with one-year mortality and with clinical survival predictions of experienced geriatricians, as reflected by TLDs given.

摘要

背景

由于预后不确定,及时识别需要姑息治疗的老年患者尤其具有挑战性。支持和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT)旨在促进这种识别,但尚未在老年人群中得到验证。

目的

本研究旨在验证 SPICT 在入住医院的老年患者人群中的有效性。

设计

这是一项回顾性队列研究。

设置

研究对象为 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日期间入住比利时一所大学医院急性老年病房的患者。

测量

收集包括人口统计学、功能状态、合并症、治疗限制决策(TLD)和一年死亡率在内的数据。通过独立评估员回顾性测量 SPICT。

结果

在 435 名纳入的患者中,使用一般指标的截断值为 2 和临床问题的截断值为 1 时,有 54.7%的患者 SPICT 阳性。SPICT 阳性患者年龄较大(p=0.033)、更频繁为男性(p=0.028)且合并症更多(p=0.015)。总体一年死亡率为 32.2%,SPICT 阳性患者为 48.7%,SPICT 阴性患者为 11.5%(p<0.001)。SPICT 预测一年死亡率的敏感性为 0.841,特异性为 0.579。SPICT 的一般指标(0.758)和临床指标(0.748)的曲线下面积无差异(p=0.638)。在 71.4%的 SPICT 阳性病例中存在 TLD,而在 SPICT 阴性病例中为 26.9%(p<0.001)。

结论

SPICT 似乎可用于识别需要姑息治疗的老年患者,因为它与一年死亡率以及经验丰富的老年病学家给出的 TLD 所反映的临床生存预测显著相关。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in a Geriatric Population.支持性和姑息治疗指标工具在老年人群中的验证。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):220-224. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0205. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
2
SPICT as a predictive tool for risk of 1-year health degradation and death in older patients admitted to the emergency department: a bicentric cohort study in Belgium.SPICT 作为预测工具,用于预测急诊科老年患者 1 年内健康恶化和死亡的风险:比利时的一项双中心队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jun 24;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01201-9.
3
Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool prognostic value in older hospitalised patients: a prospective multicentre study.支持性与姑息治疗指标工具对老年住院患者的预后价值:一项前瞻性多中心研究
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 May 31;14(e2). doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003042.
4
Early integration of palliative care: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and content validity of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in a Swedish healthcare context.早期姑息治疗的整合:支持性和姑息治疗指标工具在瑞典医疗保健环境中的翻译、跨文化调适和内容效度。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Sep;34(3):762-771. doi: 10.1111/scs.12781. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
5
Palliative Referrals in Advanced Cancer Patients: Utilizing the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool and Rothman Index.晚期癌症患者的姑息治疗转介:使用支持性和姑息治疗指标工具及 Rothman 指数。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Feb;39(2):164-168. doi: 10.1177/10499091211017873. Epub 2021 May 18.
6
Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version.支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT™):意大利语版本的内容效度、可行性和预测试。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jun 6;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00584-3.
7
Systematic identification of critically ill and dying patients in primary care using the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE).使用德国版支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-DE)在初级保健中系统识别危重症和临终患者。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Feb 3;18:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/000278. eCollection 2020.
8
Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE).支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-DE)德语版的系统开发和调整。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Feb 17;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0283-7.
9
Implementation and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) in acute care.在急性护理中实施和评估支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT™)。
Australas J Ageing. 2024 Sep;43(3):591-599. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13308. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
10
Systematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS).支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-LIS)泰语版在低收入环境下的系统适应性调整。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Feb 19;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00729-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) Tool in Germany.姑息治疗与快速急诊筛查(P-CaRES)工具在德国的验证。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 23;14(7):2191. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072191.
2
The accuracy of an electronic-Surprise-Question defining end-of-life cohorts in a whole adult population by algorithmic digital risk stratification: the Proactive Risk-Based and Data-Driven Assessment of Patients at the End of Life (PRADA).通过算法数字风险分层在全成年人口中定义临终队列的电子惊喜问题的准确性:基于风险的主动和数据驱动的临终患者评估(PRADA)。
EBioMedicine. 2025 May;115:105682. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105682. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
3
Goals of care discussions and treatment limitation decisions in European acute geriatric units: a one-day cross-sectional study.
欧洲急性老年病科的照护目标讨论与治疗限制决策:一项为期一天的横断面研究。
Age Ageing. 2025 Feb 2;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf026.
4
Developing an electronic surprise question to predict end-of-life prognosis in a prospective cohort study of acute hospital admissions.在一项关于急性医院入院患者的前瞻性队列研究中开发一个电子突发问题以预测临终预后。
Clin Med (Lond). 2025 Mar;25(2):100292. doi: 10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100292. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
5
Supportive and palliative care needs among older adults in India: an estimation using a nationally representative survey.印度老年人的支持性和姑息治疗需求:基于全国代表性调查的估计。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Nov 30;23(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01604-2.
6
Adaptation of the Taiwan Version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-TW) and Its Association with Six-Month Mortality: A Multi-Center Validation Study in Older People.台湾版支持性与姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT-TW)的改编及其与六个月死亡率的关联:一项针对老年人的多中心验证研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 1;12(21):2185. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212185.
7
Evaluating the Utility of the Surprise Question Among General Physicians for Appropriate Palliative Care Indication in Brazil.评估巴西普通内科医生中用于适当姑息治疗指征的意外问题的效用。
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Jul 19;5(1):261-268. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0003. eCollection 2024.
8
Impact of a prospective feedback loop aimed at reducing non-beneficial treatments in older people admitted to hospital and potentially nearing the end of life. A cluster stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.旨在减少老年住院患者和接近生命终点人群非获益性治疗的前瞻性反馈回路的影响。一项群组整群随机对照试验。
Age Ageing. 2024 Jun 1;53(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae115.
9
Palliative Care in the Community: The Greek Version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™).社区中的缓和医疗:支持和缓和医疗指标工具(SPICT™)的希腊语版本。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241245842. doi: 10.1177/21501319241245842.
10
Identifying cancer patients who received palliative care using the SPICT-LIS in medical records: a rule-based algorithm and text-mining technique.利用病历中的 SPICT-LIS 识别接受姑息治疗的癌症患者:基于规则的算法和文本挖掘技术。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 1;23(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01419-1.