Suppr超能文献

支持性和姑息治疗指标工具在老年人群中的验证。

Validation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in a Geriatric Population.

机构信息

1 Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium .

2 Department of Geriatrics, Ghent University Hospital , Ghent, Belgium .

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):220-224. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0205. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Timely identification of patients in need of palliative care is especially challenging in a geriatric population because of prognostic uncertainty. The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) aims at facilitating this identification, yet has not been validated in a geriatric population.

OBJECTIVE

This study validates the SPICT in a geriatric patient population admitted to the hospital.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Subject were patients admitted to the acute geriatric ward of a Belgian university hospital between January 1 and June 30, 2014.

MEASUREMENTS

Data including demographics, functional status, comorbidities, treatment limitation decision (TLD), and one-year mortality were collected. SPICT was measured retrospectively by an independent assessor.

RESULTS

Out of 435 included patients, 54.7% had a positive SPICT, using a cut-off value of 2 for the general indicators and a cut-off value of 1 for the clinical questions. SPICT-positive patients were older (p = 0.033), more frequently male (p = 0.028), and had more comorbidities (p = 0.015) than SPICT-negative patients. The overall one-year mortality was 32.2%, 48.7% in SPICT-positive patients, and 11.5% in SPICT-negative patients (p < 0.001). SPICT predicted one-year mortality with a sensitivity of 0.841 and a specificity of 0.579. The area under the curve of the general indicators (0.758) and the clinical indicators of SPICT (0.748) did not differ (p = 0.638). In 71.4% of SPICT-positive cases, a TLD was present versus 26.9% in SPICT-negative cases (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SPICT seems to be valuable for identifying geriatric patients in need of palliative care as it demonstrates significant association with one-year mortality and with clinical survival predictions of experienced geriatricians, as reflected by TLDs given.

摘要

背景

由于预后不确定,及时识别需要姑息治疗的老年患者尤其具有挑战性。支持和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT)旨在促进这种识别,但尚未在老年人群中得到验证。

目的

本研究旨在验证 SPICT 在入住医院的老年患者人群中的有效性。

设计

这是一项回顾性队列研究。

设置

研究对象为 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日期间入住比利时一所大学医院急性老年病房的患者。

测量

收集包括人口统计学、功能状态、合并症、治疗限制决策(TLD)和一年死亡率在内的数据。通过独立评估员回顾性测量 SPICT。

结果

在 435 名纳入的患者中,使用一般指标的截断值为 2 和临床问题的截断值为 1 时,有 54.7%的患者 SPICT 阳性。SPICT 阳性患者年龄较大(p=0.033)、更频繁为男性(p=0.028)且合并症更多(p=0.015)。总体一年死亡率为 32.2%,SPICT 阳性患者为 48.7%,SPICT 阴性患者为 11.5%(p<0.001)。SPICT 预测一年死亡率的敏感性为 0.841,特异性为 0.579。SPICT 的一般指标(0.758)和临床指标(0.748)的曲线下面积无差异(p=0.638)。在 71.4%的 SPICT 阳性病例中存在 TLD,而在 SPICT 阴性病例中为 26.9%(p<0.001)。

结论

SPICT 似乎可用于识别需要姑息治疗的老年患者,因为它与一年死亡率以及经验丰富的老年病学家给出的 TLD 所反映的临床生存预测显著相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验