Karas Steve, Olson Hunt Megan J, Temes Bill, Thiel Martin, Swoverland Trenton, Windsor Brett
Physical Therapy, Chatham University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Natural and Applied Sciences (Statistics), University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, WI, USA.
J Man Manip Ther. 2018 Feb;26(1):3-10. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2016.1260674. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
To determine the difference on neck outcomes with directional manipulation to the thoracic spine. There is evidence that thoracic spine manipulation is effective in treating patients with neck pain. However, there is no research that determines if the assessment of directional hypomobility and the selection of thrust direction offer improved outcomes.
A total of 69 patients with cervical spine pain were randomly assigned to receive either a manipulation that was consistent with their thoracic spine motion loss (matched) or opposite their motion loss (unmatched). The patient was given care consistent with the orthopedic section guidelines for neck pain and the physical therapist's clinical reasoning. Baseline outcome measures (NPRS, NDI, GROC) were taken and reassessed two days and two weeks after treatment.
Both groups had positive results when pain, neck disability index, and global rating of change were assessed. There was no difference between the matched and unmatched groups.
Directional manipulation of hypomobile thoracic spine segments may not be required to improved outcomes in patients with neck pain. Future studies should assess a variety of factors when determining the best available treatment, including manual therapy procedures, exercise, and patient selection.
1b.
确定对胸椎进行定向手法治疗后颈部治疗效果的差异。有证据表明,胸椎手法治疗对颈部疼痛患者有效。然而,尚无研究确定对活动度降低方向的评估以及推力方向的选择是否能带来更好的治疗效果。
总共69例颈椎疼痛患者被随机分配,分别接受与胸椎活动度丧失情况相符(匹配组)或相反(不匹配组)的手法治疗。给予患者符合骨科颈部疼痛治疗指南及物理治疗师临床推理的护理。在治疗前、治疗后两天和两周分别进行基线结果测量(数字疼痛评分量表、颈部残疾指数、总体变化评定)。
在评估疼痛、颈部残疾指数和总体变化评定时,两组均有积极结果。匹配组和不匹配组之间没有差异。
对于颈部疼痛患者,改善治疗效果可能并不需要对活动度降低的胸椎节段进行定向手法治疗。未来的研究在确定最佳治疗方案时应评估多种因素,包括手法治疗程序、运动疗法和患者选择。
1b。