• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎间盘置换术:单节段、多节段及混合手术的综合综述

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review of Single-Level, Multilevel, and Hybrid Procedures.

作者信息

Laratta Joseph L, Shillingford Jamal N, Saifi Comron, Riew K Daniel

机构信息

The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian Healthcare System, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2018 Feb;8(1):78-83. doi: 10.1177/2192568217701095. Epub 2017 May 16.

DOI:10.1177/2192568217701095
PMID:29456918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5810892/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

Degenerative disc disease and spondylosis resulting in radiculopathy and retrodiscal myelopathy are among the most frequently encountered cervical spinal disorders. Traditionally, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has successfully achieved neural decompression and restored intradiscal height in these conditions. Unfortunately, nonunion and iatrogenic adjacent segment pathology associated with fusion procedures in the cervical spine has led to an interest in motion-preserving procedures. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was developed in hopes of preserving cervical biomechanics while mitigating the complications associated with ACDF. Through a systematic review of both published and ongoing studies on single- and multilevel CDA, and hybrid surgeries, we aim to provide evidence for their safety and efficacy in the treatment of various cervical pathologies.

METHODS

A systematic search of several large databases, including Cochrane Central, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry was conducted to identify published studies and ongoing clinical trials on CDA and hybrid surgery.

RESULTS

Among the relevant studies reviewed, 3 were randomized controlled trials, 2 systematic reviews, as well as multiple prospective case series, biomechanical studies, and meta-analyses.

CONCLUSION

Over the past decade, multiple high-quality studies have shown that single-level CDA can offer equivalent clinical outcomes with a reduction in secondary procedures and total cost when compared to ACDF. However, more recently there has been an increasing prevalence of 2-level CDA and hybrid surgery. Although the data regarding these multilevel procedures is less robust, it appears that they may be as effective as their single-level counterparts.

摘要

研究设计

系统评价。

目的

导致神经根病和椎间盘后脊髓病的椎间盘退变疾病和脊椎关节强硬是最常见的颈椎疾病。传统上,颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)在这些情况下已成功实现神经减压并恢复椎间盘高度。不幸的是,颈椎融合手术相关的不愈合和医源性相邻节段病变引发了人们对保留运动功能手术的兴趣。颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)的开发旨在保留颈椎生物力学,同时减轻与ACDF相关的并发症。通过对已发表和正在进行的关于单节段和多节段CDA以及混合手术的研究进行系统评价,我们旨在为它们在治疗各种颈椎病变中的安全性和有效性提供证据。

方法

对几个大型数据库进行系统检索,包括Cochrane中心、PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册库,以识别关于CDA和混合手术的已发表研究和正在进行的临床试验。

结果

在所审查的相关研究中,有3项随机对照试验、2项系统评价以及多项前瞻性病例系列、生物力学研究和荟萃分析。

结论

在过去十年中,多项高质量研究表明,与ACDF相比,单节段CDA可提供相当的临床结果,同时减少二次手术和总成本。然而,最近双节段CDA和混合手术的患病率越来越高。尽管关于这些多节段手术的数据不太充分,但它们似乎可能与其单节段手术效果相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d714/5810892/e3b603a7f1ba/10.1177_2192568217701095-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d714/5810892/dee3fd9a7e24/10.1177_2192568217701095-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d714/5810892/5904b503a76a/10.1177_2192568217701095-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d714/5810892/e3b603a7f1ba/10.1177_2192568217701095-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d714/5810892/dee3fd9a7e24/10.1177_2192568217701095-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d714/5810892/5904b503a76a/10.1177_2192568217701095-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d714/5810892/e3b603a7f1ba/10.1177_2192568217701095-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review of Single-Level, Multilevel, and Hybrid Procedures.颈椎间盘置换术:单节段、多节段及混合手术的综合综述
Global Spine J. 2018 Feb;8(1):78-83. doi: 10.1177/2192568217701095. Epub 2017 May 16.
2
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?颈椎间盘置换术对先天性颈椎管狭窄症有益吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Multilevel cervical arthroplasty: current evidence. A systematic review.多级颈椎关节成形术:当前证据。一项系统评价。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E4. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.FOCUS16354.
4
Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty-Long-Term Evidence Update.两级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术——长期证据更新
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S36-S40. doi: 10.14444/7089.
5
The safety and efficacy of hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多节段颈椎退行性疾病采用杂交手术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术或颈椎间盘置换术的安全性和有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Feb;162(2):289-303. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04129-3. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
6
Current Concepts of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.颈椎间盘置换术的当前概念
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):1174-1183. doi: 10.14444/8149.
7
Biomechanical effects on the intermediate segment of noncontiguous hybrid surgery with cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术非连续杂交手术中中间节段的生物力学效应:有限元分析。
Spine J. 2019 Jul;19(7):1254-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
8
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)治疗两节段颈椎间盘退变疾病的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
9
Evidence-based use of arthroplasty in cervical degenerative disc disease.基于循证医学的颈椎退变性疾病关节置换术的应用。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):767-775. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-04281-y. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
10
Long-term Results Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的长期疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):16-30. doi: 10.1111/os.12585. Epub 2019 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative Physical Therapy for Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Case Report.颈椎全椎间盘置换术后的物理治疗:一例报告
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):842-854. doi: 10.26603/001c.137694. eCollection 2025.
2
High Volume Hospitals are Associated With Decreased Rates of Non-Routine Discharge Following Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.高手术量医院与单节段颈椎间盘置换术后非常规出院率降低相关。
Global Spine J. 2025 Apr 28:21925682251339621. doi: 10.1177/21925682251339621.
3
Impact of nicotine product use on outcomes of patients receiving cervical disc arthroplasty: a propensity score analysis of the united States nationwide inpatient sample 2005-2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)治疗两节段颈椎间盘退变疾病的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
2
Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.颈椎间盘置换与前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段症状性退行性椎间盘疾病的五年临床结果:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心研究性器械豁免临床试验。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):213-24. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.SPINE15824. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
3
尼古丁产品使用对接受颈椎间盘置换术患者预后的影响:对2005 - 2020年美国全国住院患者样本的倾向评分分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Mar 19;20(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05700-8.
4
Which spine surgery techniques are most appealing to the public? A survey examining public perception of spine surgery techniques and factors associated with procedure preference.哪些脊柱手术技术最吸引公众?一项调查公众对脊柱手术技术的看法以及与手术偏好相关因素的研究。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jan 27;21:100588. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100588. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Comparison of the efficacy of ROI-C cage with Zero-P device in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of cervical degenerative disc disease: a two-year follow-up study.ROI-C椎间融合器与Zero-P椎间融合器在前路颈椎间盘切除融合治疗颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病中的疗效比较:一项两年随访研究。
Front Surg. 2024 Jun 3;11:1392725. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1392725. eCollection 2024.
6
Segment selection for fusion and artificial disc replacement in the hybrid surgical treatment of noncontiguous cervical spondylosis: a finite element analysis.非连续性颈椎病混合手术治疗中融合与人工椎间盘置换的节段选择:有限元分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Apr 3;12:1345319. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1345319. eCollection 2024.
7
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Rationale, Designs, and Results of Randomized Controlled Trials.颈椎间盘置换术:随机对照试验的原理、设计与结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Feb 27;18(3):258-76. doi: 10.14444/8586.
8
Specialty Impact on Patient Outcomes: Paving a Way for an Integrated Approach to Spinal Disorders.专业对患者预后的影响:为脊柱疾病的综合治疗方法铺平道路。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 25;15(9):e45962. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45962. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Clinical Effectiveness of Artificial Disc Replacement in Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Patients With Cervical Myelopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.人工椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Neurospine. 2023 Sep;20(3):1047-1060. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346498.249. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
10
Treatment of the two-level degenerative cervical disk diseases based on algorithmic anterior approach: a multicenter prospective study.基于算法前路入路治疗双节段退变性颈椎疾病:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Sep 18;46(1):247. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02157-3.
Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies.ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术的七年成本效益:来自研究性器械豁免和批准后研究的结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 May;24(5):760-8. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15505. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
4
ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段有症状颈椎间盘疾病:美国食品药品监督管理局前瞻性随机研究器械豁免研究的七年随访
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Nov 4;97(21):1738-47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01186.
5
Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Disc Replacement and Fusion Using Single Level, Two Level, and Hybrid Constructs.使用单节段、双节段和混合结构对颈椎间盘置换与融合进行生物力学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Oct 15;40(20):1578-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001044.
6
Comparison of hybrid constructs with 2-level artificial disc replacement and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for surgical reconstruction of the cervical spine: a kinematic study in whole cadavers.用于颈椎手术重建的混合结构与两级人工椎间盘置换及两级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的比较:一项全尸体的运动学研究
Med Sci Monit. 2015 Apr 8;21:1031-7. doi: 10.12659/MSM.892712.
7
Incidence of dysphagia comparing cervical arthroplasty and ACDF.比较颈椎人工关节置换术和颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术吞咽困难的发生率。
SAS J. 2010 Mar 1;4(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2009.12.001. eCollection 2010.
8
Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.颈椎前路间盘切除融合术与 Mobi-C 颈椎人工椎间盘置换术治疗双节段颈椎病的前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心临床研究:4 年随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Jan;22(1):15-25. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13953.
9
Cost-effectiveness of cervical total disc replacement vs fusion for the treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease.颈椎间盘置换与融合治疗 2 节段症状性退行性椎间盘疾病的成本效益比较。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Dec;149(12):1231-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.716.
10
Multi-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus single-level CDA for the treatment of cervical disc diseases: a meta-analysis.多节段颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)与单节段颈椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎间盘疾病的Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2015 Jan;24(1):101-12. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3429-1. Epub 2014 Jun 25.