Laratta Joseph L, Shillingford Jamal N, Saifi Comron, Riew K Daniel
The Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian Healthcare System, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Global Spine J. 2018 Feb;8(1):78-83. doi: 10.1177/2192568217701095. Epub 2017 May 16.
Systematic review.
Degenerative disc disease and spondylosis resulting in radiculopathy and retrodiscal myelopathy are among the most frequently encountered cervical spinal disorders. Traditionally, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has successfully achieved neural decompression and restored intradiscal height in these conditions. Unfortunately, nonunion and iatrogenic adjacent segment pathology associated with fusion procedures in the cervical spine has led to an interest in motion-preserving procedures. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was developed in hopes of preserving cervical biomechanics while mitigating the complications associated with ACDF. Through a systematic review of both published and ongoing studies on single- and multilevel CDA, and hybrid surgeries, we aim to provide evidence for their safety and efficacy in the treatment of various cervical pathologies.
A systematic search of several large databases, including Cochrane Central, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry was conducted to identify published studies and ongoing clinical trials on CDA and hybrid surgery.
Among the relevant studies reviewed, 3 were randomized controlled trials, 2 systematic reviews, as well as multiple prospective case series, biomechanical studies, and meta-analyses.
Over the past decade, multiple high-quality studies have shown that single-level CDA can offer equivalent clinical outcomes with a reduction in secondary procedures and total cost when compared to ACDF. However, more recently there has been an increasing prevalence of 2-level CDA and hybrid surgery. Although the data regarding these multilevel procedures is less robust, it appears that they may be as effective as their single-level counterparts.
系统评价。
导致神经根病和椎间盘后脊髓病的椎间盘退变疾病和脊椎关节强硬是最常见的颈椎疾病。传统上,颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)在这些情况下已成功实现神经减压并恢复椎间盘高度。不幸的是,颈椎融合手术相关的不愈合和医源性相邻节段病变引发了人们对保留运动功能手术的兴趣。颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)的开发旨在保留颈椎生物力学,同时减轻与ACDF相关的并发症。通过对已发表和正在进行的关于单节段和多节段CDA以及混合手术的研究进行系统评价,我们旨在为它们在治疗各种颈椎病变中的安全性和有效性提供证据。
对几个大型数据库进行系统检索,包括Cochrane中心、PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册库,以识别关于CDA和混合手术的已发表研究和正在进行的临床试验。
在所审查的相关研究中,有3项随机对照试验、2项系统评价以及多项前瞻性病例系列、生物力学研究和荟萃分析。
在过去十年中,多项高质量研究表明,与ACDF相比,单节段CDA可提供相当的临床结果,同时减少二次手术和总成本。然而,最近双节段CDA和混合手术的患病率越来越高。尽管关于这些多节段手术的数据不太充分,但它们似乎可能与其单节段手术效果相当。