Suppr超能文献

多级颈椎关节成形术:当前证据。一项系统评价。

Multilevel cervical arthroplasty: current evidence. A systematic review.

作者信息

Joaquim Andrei F, Riew K Daniel

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Discipline of Neurosurgery, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil; and.

Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University, New York, New York.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E4. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.FOCUS16354.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment modality for single-level cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Its advantages over an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) include motion preservation and decreased reoperations at the index and adjacent segments up to 7 years postoperatively. Considering the fact that many patients have multilevel cervical disc degeneration (CDD), the authors performed a systematic review of the clinical studies evaluating patients who underwent multilevel CDA (2 or more levels). METHODS A systematic review in the MEDLINE database was performed. Clinical studies including patients who had multilevel CDA were selected and included. Case reports and literature reviews were excluded. Articles were then grouped according to their main study objective: 1) studies comparing multilevel CDA versus ACDF; 2) studies comparing single-level CDA versus multilevel CDA; and 3) multilevel CDA after a previous cervical spine surgery. RESULTS Fourteen articles met all inclusion criteria. The general conclusions were that multilevel CDA was at least as safe and effective as ACDF, with preservation of cervical motion when compared with ACDF and potentially with fewer reoperations expected in most of the studies. Multilevel CDAs are clinically effective as single-level surgeries, with good clinical and radiological outcomes. Some studies reported a higher incidence of heterotopic ossification in multilevel CDA when compared with single-level procedures, but without clinical relevance during the follow-up period. A CDA may be indicated even after a previous cervical surgery in selected cases. CONCLUSIONS The current literature supports the use of multilevel CDA. Caution is necessary regarding the more restrictive indications for CDA when compared with ACDF. Further prospective, controlled, multicenter, and randomized studies not sponsored by the device manufactures are desirable to prove the superiority of CDA surgery over ACDF as the treatment of choice for CDD in selected cases.

摘要

目的 颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)已被证明是治疗单节段颈椎神经根病或脊髓病的一种有效治疗方式。与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)相比,其优势包括保留运动功能以及在术后长达7年的时间里,索引节段和相邻节段的再次手术率降低。鉴于许多患者存在多节段颈椎间盘退变(CDD),作者对评估接受多节段CDA(2个或更多节段)患者的临床研究进行了系统评价。方法 在MEDLINE数据库中进行了系统评价。选择并纳入了包括接受多节段CDA患者的临床研究。排除病例报告和文献综述。然后根据主要研究目的对文章进行分组:1)比较多节段CDA与ACDF的研究;2)比较单节段CDA与多节段CDA的研究;3)既往颈椎手术后的多节段CDA。结果 14篇文章符合所有纳入标准。总体结论是,多节段CDA至少与ACDF一样安全有效,与ACDF相比可保留颈椎运动功能,并且在大多数研究中预期再次手术的可能性较小。多节段CDA在临床上与单节段手术一样有效,具有良好的临床和影像学结果。一些研究报告称,与单节段手术相比,多节段CDA中异位骨化的发生率更高,但在随访期间无临床相关性。在某些选定病例中,即使既往有颈椎手术史,也可能适合进行CDA。结论 当前文献支持使用多节段CDA。与ACDF相比,CDA的适应证更具限制性,因此需要谨慎。需要进一步开展由设备制造商以外的机构赞助的前瞻性、对照、多中心和随机研究,以证明CDA手术作为选定病例中CDD治疗选择优于ACDF。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验