Suppr超能文献

ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段有症状颈椎间盘疾病:美国食品药品监督管理局前瞻性随机研究器械豁免研究的七年随访

ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.

作者信息

Janssen Michael E, Zigler Jack E, Spivak Jeffrey M, Delamarter Rick B, Darden Bruce V, Kopjar Branko

机构信息

Center for Spinal Disorders/Scientific Education and Research Institute, 9005 Grant Street, Suite 200, Thornton, CO 80229.

Texas Back Institute, 6020 West Parker Road, Suite 200, Plano, TX 75093.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Nov 4;97(21):1738-47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01186.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with single-level cervical degenerative disc disease, total disc arthroplasty can relieve radicular pain and preserve functional motion between two vertebrae. We compared the efficacy and safety of cervical total disc arthroplasty with that of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of single-level cervical degenerative disc disease between C3-C4 and C6-C7.

METHODS

Two hundred and nine patients at thirteen sites were randomly treated with either total disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C (n = 103) or with ACDF (n = 106). Patients were assessed preoperatively; at six weeks and three, six, twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four months postoperatively; and then annually until seven years postoperatively. Outcome measures included the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), postoperative neurologic parameters, secondary surgical procedures, adverse events, neck and arm pain, and satisfaction scores.

RESULTS

At seven years, the overall follow-up rate was 92% (152 of 165). There were no significant differences in demographic factors, follow-up rate, or patient-reported outcomes between groups. Both procedures were effective in reducing neck and arm pain and improving and maintaining function and health-related quality of life. Neurologic status was improved or maintained in 88% and 89% of the patients in the ProDisc-C and ACDF groups, respectively. After seven years of follow-up, thirty secondary surgical procedures had been performed in nineteen (18%) of 106 patients in the ACDF group compared with seven secondary surgical procedures in seven (7%) of 103 patients in the ProDisc-C group (p = 0.0099). There were no significant differences in the rates of any device-related adverse events between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Total disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C is a safe and effective surgical treatment of single-level symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. Clinical outcomes after total disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C were similar to those after ACDF. Patients treated with ProDisc-C had a lower probability of subsequent surgery, suggesting that total disc arthroplasty provides durable results and has the potential to slow the rate of adjacent-level disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

在单节段颈椎间盘退变疾病患者中,全椎间盘置换术可缓解神经根性疼痛并保留两个椎体之间的功能活动度。我们比较了颈椎全椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗C3-C4至C6-C7单节段颈椎间盘退变疾病的疗效和安全性。

方法

13个地点的209例患者被随机分为接受ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术(n = 103)或ACDF手术(n = 106)。术前对患者进行评估;术后6周以及3、6、12、18和24个月进行评估;然后每年评估一次,直至术后7年。结果指标包括颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)、术后神经学参数、二次手术、不良事件、颈部和手臂疼痛以及满意度评分。

结果

7年时,总体随访率为92%(165例中的152例)。两组在人口统计学因素、随访率或患者报告的结果方面无显著差异。两种手术在减轻颈部和手臂疼痛以及改善和维持功能及与健康相关的生活质量方面均有效。ProDisc-C组和ACDF组分别有88%和89%的患者神经学状态得到改善或维持。随访7年后,ACDF组106例患者中有19例(18%)进行了30次二次手术,而ProDisc-C组103例患者中有7例(7%)进行了7次二次手术(p = 0.0099)。两组中任何与器械相关的不良事件发生率均无显著差异。

结论

ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术是治疗单节段有症状颈椎间盘退变疾病的一种安全有效的手术方法。ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术后的临床结果与ACDF术后相似。接受ProDisc-C治疗的患者后续手术概率较低,这表明全椎间盘置换术能提供持久的效果,并有减缓相邻节段疾病发生率的潜力。

证据水平

治疗性I级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验