• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何创建共享符号。

How to Create Shared Symbols.

作者信息

Fay Nicolas, Walker Bradley, Swoboda Nik, Garrod Simon

机构信息

School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia.

Department of Artificial Intelligence, Technical University of Madrid.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42 Suppl 1:241-269. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12600. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.12600
PMID:29457653
Abstract

Human cognition and behavior are dominated by symbol use. This paper examines the social learning strategies that give rise to symbolic communication. Experiment 1 contrasts an individual-level account, based on observational learning and cognitive bias, with an inter-individual account, based on social coordinative learning. Participants played a referential communication game in which they tried to communicate a range of recurring meanings to a partner by drawing, but without using their conventional language. Individual-level learning, via observation and cognitive bias, was sufficient to produce signs that became increasingly effective, efficient, and shared over games. However, breaking a referential precedent eliminated these benefits. The most effective, most efficient, and most shared signs arose when participants could directly interact with their partner, indicating that social coordinative learning is important to the creation of shared symbols. Experiment 2 investigated the contribution of two distinct aspects of social interaction: behavior alignment and concurrent partner feedback. Each played a complementary role in the creation of shared symbols: Behavior alignment primarily drove communication effectiveness, and partner feedback primarily drove the efficiency of the evolved signs. In conclusion, inter-individual social coordinative learning is important to the evolution of effective, efficient, and shared symbols.

摘要

人类的认知和行为受符号使用的主导。本文探讨了产生符号交流的社会学习策略。实验1将基于观察学习和认知偏差的个体层面解释与基于社会协调学习的个体间层面解释进行了对比。参与者玩了一个指称性交流游戏,在游戏中他们试图通过画图向伙伴传达一系列反复出现的含义,但不使用他们的传统语言。通过观察和认知偏差进行的个体层面学习足以产生在游戏过程中变得越来越有效、高效且具有共享性的符号。然而,打破一个指称先例就消除了这些益处。当参与者能够直接与他们的伙伴互动时,就会出现最有效、最高效且最具共享性的符号,这表明社会协调学习对于共享符号的创造很重要。实验2研究了社会互动两个不同方面的作用:行为对齐和伙伴同步反馈。它们在共享符号的创造中都发挥了互补作用:行为对齐主要推动交流的有效性,而伙伴反馈主要推动演化出的符号的效率。总之,个体间的社会协调学习对于有效、高效且共享的符号的演化很重要。

相似文献

1
How to Create Shared Symbols.如何创建共享符号。
Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42 Suppl 1:241-269. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12600. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
2
Universal Principles of Human Communication: Preliminary Evidence From a Cross-cultural Communication Game.
Cogn Sci. 2018 Sep;42(7):2397-2413. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12664. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
3
Discretisation and continuity: The emergence of symbols in communication.离散与连续:符号在交流中的出现。
Cognition. 2021 Oct;215:104787. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104787. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
4
The Influence of Shared Visual Context on the Successful Emergence of Conventions in a Referential Communication Task.共享视觉语境对参考交际任务中约定俗成成功出现的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2019 Sep;43(9):e12783. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12783.
5
Social babbling: The emergence of symbolic gestures and words.社会咿呀学语:象征手势和词语的出现。
Neural Netw. 2018 Oct;106:194-204. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
6
The interactive evolution of human communication systems.人类交流系统的互动演化。
Cogn Sci. 2010 Apr;34(3):351-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01090.x. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
7
The role of social-referential context in verbal and nonverbal symbol learning.社会参照情境在言语和非言语符号学习中的作用。
Child Dev. 2003 Mar-Apr;74(2):549-63. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.7402015.
8
Communication and cognition: the social beyond language, interaction and culture.交流与认知:超越语言、互动和文化的社会层面
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2008 Jun;42(2):200-7. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9046-3. Epub 2008 Jan 12.
9
Stick or Switch: A Selection Heuristic Predicts when People Take the Perspective of Others or Communicate Egocentrically.坚持还是改变:一种选择启发式方法预测人们何时会站在他人角度思考或进行自我中心式交流。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 20;11(7):e0159570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159570. eCollection 2016.
10
Early understanding and production of graphic symbols.对图形符号的早期理解与生成
Child Dev. 1999 Nov-Dec;70(6):1314-24. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00096.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal patterns in the complexity of child-directed song lyrics reflect their functions.面向儿童的歌曲歌词复杂性的时间模式反映了它们的功能。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Mar 24;3(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00219-4.
2
Touching at a distance: the elaboration of communicative functions from the perspective of the interactants.远距离接触:从互动者视角阐述交际功能
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1497289. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497289. eCollection 2024.
3
Innovation and enculturation in child communication: a cross-sectional study.
儿童交流中的创新与文化适应:一项横断面研究。
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Nov 9;2:e56. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.57. eCollection 2020.
4
Shared intentionality modulates interpersonal neural synchronization at the establishment of communication system.共同意向调节沟通系统建立时的人际神经同步。
Commun Biol. 2023 Aug 10;6(1):832. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05197-z.
5
Visual resemblance and interaction history jointly constrain pictorial meaning.视觉相似性和交互历史共同约束图像意义。
Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 17;14(1):2199. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37737-w.
6
Modeling Individual Differences in Children's Information Integration During Pragmatic Word Learning.语用词汇学习过程中儿童信息整合的个体差异建模
Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Dec 16;6:311-326. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00069. eCollection 2022.
7
Using agreement probability to study differences in types of concepts and conceptualizers.利用一致概率研究不同类型的概念和概念化方式之间的差异。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Jan;56(1):93-112. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02030-z. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
8
Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication.现代人类交流中的模仿化石。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 May 10;376(1824):20200204. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0204. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
9
Young children spontaneously recreate core properties of language in a new modality.幼儿会自发地在新的模态中重新创造语言的核心属性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 17;116(51):26072-26077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904871116. Epub 2019 Dec 2.