• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语用词汇学习过程中儿童信息整合的个体差异建模

Modeling Individual Differences in Children's Information Integration During Pragmatic Word Learning.

作者信息

Bohn Manuel, Schmidt Louisa S, Schulze Cornelia, Frank Michael C, Tessler Michael Henry

机构信息

Department of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Leipzig Research Center for Early Child Development, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Dec 16;6:311-326. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00069. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00069
PMID:36993141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10042310/
Abstract

Pragmatics is foundational to language use and learning. Computational cognitive models have been successfully used to predict pragmatic phenomena in adults and children - on an aggregate level. It is unclear if they can be used to predict behavior on an individual level. We address this question in children ( = 60, 3- to 5-year-olds), taking advantage of recent work on pragmatic cue integration. In Part 1, we use data from four independent tasks to estimate child-specific sensitivity parameters to three information sources: semantic knowledge, expectations about speaker informativeness, and sensitivity to common ground. In Part 2, we use these parameters to generate participant-specific trial-by-trial predictions for a new task that jointly manipulated all three information sources. The model accurately predicted children's behavior in the majority of trials. This work advances a substantive theory of individual differences in which the primary locus of developmental variation is sensitivity to individual information sources.

摘要

语用学是语言使用和学习的基础。计算认知模型已成功用于预测成人和儿童在总体层面上的语用现象。目前尚不清楚它们是否可用于预测个体层面的行为。我们利用最近关于语用线索整合的研究,对60名3至5岁的儿童进行了研究,以解决这个问题。在第一部分中,我们使用来自四个独立任务的数据来估计儿童对三种信息源的特定敏感性参数:语义知识、对说话者信息量的期望以及对共同基础的敏感性。在第二部分中,我们使用这些参数为一个新任务生成特定于参与者的逐次试验预测,该任务同时操纵了所有三种信息源。该模型在大多数试验中准确预测了儿童的行为。这项工作推进了一种关于个体差异的实质性理论,其中发展变化的主要场所是对个体信息源的敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a928/10042310/6f6974eb6152/opmi-06-311-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a928/10042310/75990520defe/opmi-06-311-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a928/10042310/50e081f9bdb5/opmi-06-311-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a928/10042310/fb4116698b64/opmi-06-311-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a928/10042310/6f6974eb6152/opmi-06-311-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a928/10042310/75990520defe/opmi-06-311-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a928/10042310/50e081f9bdb5/opmi-06-311-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a928/10042310/fb4116698b64/opmi-06-311-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a928/10042310/6f6974eb6152/opmi-06-311-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling Individual Differences in Children's Information Integration During Pragmatic Word Learning.语用词汇学习过程中儿童信息整合的个体差异建模
Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Dec 16;6:311-326. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00069. eCollection 2022.
2
Pragmatics aid referent disambiguation and word learning in young children and adults.语用学有助于儿童和成人消除指代歧义并学习单词。
Dev Sci. 2023 Jul;26(4):e13363. doi: 10.1111/desc.13363. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
3
Predicting pragmatic cue integration in adults' and children's inferences about novel word meanings.预测成人和儿童在推理新词义时对语用线索的整合。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Nov;151(11):2927-2942. doi: 10.1037/xge0001216. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
An individual differences perspective on pragmatic abilities in the preschool years.学前阶段语用能力的个体差异视角
Dev Sci. 2023 Nov;26(6):e13401. doi: 10.1111/desc.13401. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Dynamic assessment of multilingual children's word learning.多语言儿童词汇学习的动态评估
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jul;57(4):822-851. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12723. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
7
Exploration, Explanation, and Parent-Child Interaction in Museums.博物馆中的探索、解释与亲子互动。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2020 Mar;85(1):7-137. doi: 10.1111/mono.12412.
8
How young children integrate information sources to infer the meaning of words.幼儿如何整合信息源来推断单词的意思。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):1046-1054. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01145-1. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
9
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
10
Bilingual and monolingual children attend to different cues when learning new words.双语儿童和单语儿童在学习新单词时会注意不同的线索。
Front Psychol. 2012 May 25;3:155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00155. eCollection 2012.

引用本文的文献

1
Pragmatics as Social Inference About Intentional Action.语用学作为关于意向行动的社会推理
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Feb 8;9:290-304. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00191. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
An individual differences perspective on pragmatic abilities in the preschool years.学前阶段语用能力的个体差异视角
Dev Sci. 2023 Nov;26(6):e13401. doi: 10.1111/desc.13401. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
2
Predicting pragmatic cue integration in adults' and children's inferences about novel word meanings.预测成人和儿童在推理新词义时对语用线索的整合。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Nov;151(11):2927-2942. doi: 10.1037/xge0001216. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
Are There Reliable Qualitative Individual Difference in Cognition?认知中是否存在可靠的个体质性差异?
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):46. doi: 10.5334/joc.131. eCollection 2021.
4
How young children integrate information sources to infer the meaning of words.幼儿如何整合信息源来推断单词的意思。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):1046-1054. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01145-1. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science.计算社会科学中的解释与预测融合。
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7866):181-188. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03659-0. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
6
Twelve-month-olds disambiguate new words using mutual-exclusivity inferences.12 个月大的婴儿通过互斥推理来区分新单词。
Cognition. 2021 Aug;213:104691. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104691. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
7
Children understand communication intuitively, but indirect communication makes them think twice-Evidence from pupillometry and looking patterns.儿童本能地理解交流,但间接交流让他们三思而后行——瞳孔测量和注视模式的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Jun;206:105105. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105105. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
8
How Computational Modeling Can Force Theory Building in Psychological Science.计算建模如何推动心理科学中的理论构建。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):789-802. doi: 10.1177/1745691620970585. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
9
Theory Before the Test: How to Build High-Verisimilitude Explanatory Theories in Psychological Science.理论先行于检验:如何在心理科学中构建高拟真度的解释性理论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):682-697. doi: 10.1177/1745691620970604. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
10
Polite Speech Emerges From Competing Social Goals.礼貌用语源于相互竞争的社会目标。
Open Mind (Camb). 2020 Nov;4:71-87. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00035.