Suppr超能文献

从左甲状腺素钠片改用其他药物治疗甲状腺功能减退症的经济影响。

The economic impact of switching from Synthroid for the treatment of hypothyroidism.

作者信息

Khandelwal Nikhil, Johns Beverly, Hepp Zsolt, Castelli-Haley Jane

机构信息

a AbbVie, Inc. , North Chicago , IL , USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2018 May;21(5):518-524. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1443110. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare hypothyroidism-related costs for patients who continuously used Synthroid and patients who switched from Synthroid to alternative therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Truven's Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database from January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2014 was queried for US adults diagnosed with hypothyroidism who initiated Synthroid and adhered to such therapy for at least 6 months. Propensity score matching matched continuous users of Synthroid to patients who switched from Synthroid to alternative levothyroxine agents. Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed differences between the matched cohorts in several categories of costs, including disease-related drug costs, non-drug medical costs, and total direct medical costs.

RESULTS

There were 10,159 individuals included in the study, with 7,991 continuous users of Synthroid and 2,168 switchers. After matching (n = 2,052 for each cohort), continuous use of Synthroid was associated with significantly lower hypothyroidism-related non-drug medical costs ($595 vs $1,023; p = .003) and reduced hypothyroidism-related total medical costs ($757 vs $1,132; p = .010), despite being associated with significantly higher drug costs ($161 vs $109; p < .001). Hypothyroidism-related total medical costs rose as the number of switches of hypothyroidism treatment increased, with continuous users having significantly lower hypothyroidism-related total medical costs ($757) compared with patients who switched twice ($1,179; p = .001) or three or more times ($1,268; p = .004).

LIMITATIONS

The analyses focused on continuously insured patients who were adherent to Synthroid for at least 6 months and results may not be generalizable. The reliance on claims data does not allow for clinical examination of hypothyroidism or inclusion of some factors that may be associated with outcomes. The analyses assume that all prescriptions filled are taken as prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that there are significant direct economic healthcare costs associated with switching from Synthroid to alternative levothyroxine therapies, and that these costs increase as patients switch therapies more frequently.

摘要

目的

比较持续使用左甲状腺素钠片(优甲乐)的患者与从左甲状腺素钠片(优甲乐)转换为其他疗法的患者的甲状腺功能减退相关费用。

材料与方法

查询2007年1月1日至2014年6月30日Truven健康分析公司的市场扫描商业索赔和病历数据库,纳入诊断为甲状腺功能减退并开始使用左甲状腺素钠片(优甲乐)且坚持该治疗至少6个月的美国成年人。倾向得分匹配法将持续使用左甲状腺素钠片(优甲乐)的患者与从左甲状腺素钠片(优甲乐)转换为其他左甲状腺素制剂的患者进行匹配。Kruskal-Wallis检验评估匹配队列在几类费用方面的差异,包括疾病相关药物费用、非药物医疗费用和总直接医疗费用。

结果

该研究共纳入10159例个体,其中7991例持续使用左甲状腺素钠片(优甲乐),2168例转换用药。匹配后(每组n = 2052),持续使用左甲状腺素钠片(优甲乐)与显著更低的甲状腺功能减退相关非药物医疗费用(595美元对1023美元;p = 0.003)以及更低的甲状腺功能减退相关总医疗费用(757美元对1132美元;p = 0.010)相关,尽管其与显著更高的药物费用相关(161美元对109美元;p < 0.001)。随着甲状腺功能减退治疗转换次数的增加,甲状腺功能减退相关总医疗费用上升,持续使用者的甲状腺功能减退相关总医疗费用(757美元)显著低于转换两次的患者(1179美元;p = 0.001)或转换三次及以上的患者(1268美元;p = 0.004)。

局限性

分析聚焦于持续参保且坚持使用左甲状腺素钠片(优甲乐)至少6个月的患者,结果可能无法推广。对索赔数据的依赖不允许对甲状腺功能减退进行临床检查,也无法纳入一些可能与结局相关的因素。分析假定所有开具的处方都按规定服用。

结论

结果表明,从左甲状腺素钠片(优甲乐)转换为其他左甲状腺素疗法会产生显著的直接医疗保健经济成本,且随着患者更频繁地转换疗法,这些成本会增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验