• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两阶段双游戏模型方法视角下的医疗可及性难度。

Two-stage dual-game model approach to view the difficulty of healthcare accessibility.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;11:1078675. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1078675. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1078675
PMID:36969632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10033865/
Abstract

This study proposed a two-stage dual-game model methodology to evaluate the existing difficulty of healthcare accessibility in China. First, we analyzed a multi-player El Farol bar game with incomplete information by mixed strategy to explore the Nash equilibrium, and then a weighted El Farol bar game was discussed to identify the existence of a contradiction between supply and demand sides in a tertiary hospital. Second, the overall payoff based on healthcare quality was calculated. In terms of the probability of medical experience reaching that expected level, residents are not optimistic about going to the hospital, and the longer the observation period is, the more pronounced this trend becomes. By adjusting the threshold value to observe the change in the probability of being able to obtain the expected medical experience, it is found that the median number of hospital visits is a key parameter. Going to the hospital did bring benefits to people with consideration of the payoffs, while the benefits varied significantly with the observation period among different months. This study is recommended as a new method and approach to quantitatively assess the tense relationship in access to medical care between the demand and supply sides and a foundation for policy and practice improvements to ensure the efficient delivery of healthcare.

摘要

本研究提出了一种两阶段双博弈模型方法,以评估中国现有医疗保健可及性的困难程度。首先,我们通过混合策略分析了一个具有不完全信息的多玩家 El Farol 酒吧游戏,以探索纳什均衡,然后讨论了加权 El Farol 酒吧游戏,以确定三甲医院供需双方之间是否存在矛盾。其次,根据医疗质量计算了总体收益。就医疗体验达到预期水平的概率而言,居民对去医院就医并不乐观,观察期越长,这种趋势越明显。通过调整阈值来观察获得预期医疗体验的概率的变化,发现医院就诊中位数是一个关键参数。考虑到收益,去医院确实给人们带来了好处,而不同月份的观察期不同,收益差异很大。本研究建议将其作为一种新的方法和途径,对医疗保健供需双方之间紧张关系进行定量评估,并为改善政策和实践提供基础,以确保医疗保健的有效提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d57/10033865/cec665d81ca8/fpubh-11-1078675-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d57/10033865/cec665d81ca8/fpubh-11-1078675-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d57/10033865/cec665d81ca8/fpubh-11-1078675-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Two-stage dual-game model approach to view the difficulty of healthcare accessibility.两阶段双游戏模型方法视角下的医疗可及性难度。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;11:1078675. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1078675. eCollection 2023.
2
The cross-regional settlement methods in hospitals and the treatment-seeking behavior of patients with malignant tumors in China: an evolutionary game model.中国医院跨区域结算方式与恶性肿瘤患者就医行为:一个演化博弈模型
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 17;12:1427164. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1427164. eCollection 2024.
3
N-player quantum games in an EPR setting.在 EPR 设置中的 N 人量子博弈。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036404. Epub 2012 May 11.
4
Network-Based Phase Space Analysis of the El Farol Bar Problem.基于网络的 El Farol 酒吧问题相空间分析。
Artif Life. 2021 Nov 2;27(2):113-130. doi: 10.1162/artl_a_00347.
5
The Worst-Case Weighted Multi-Objective Game with an Application to Supply Chain Competitions.具有供应链竞争应用的最坏情况加权多目标博弈
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147341. eCollection 2016.
6
Evolution of cooperation with respect to fixation probabilities in multi-player games with random payoffs.在具有随机收益的多人游戏中,随着固定概率的演变合作。
Theor Popul Biol. 2022 Jun;145:1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
7
Smallpox, risks of terrorist attacks, and the Nash equilibrium: an introduction to game theory and an examination of the smallpox vaccination program.天花、恐怖袭击风险与纳什均衡:博弈论简介与天花疫苗接种计划分析。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):231-8. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00006865.
8
The Robust Weighted Multi-Objective Game.稳健加权多目标博弈
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 25;10(9):e0138970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138970. eCollection 2015.
9
Modeling the probability distribution of the bacterial burst size via a game-theoretic approach.通过博弈论方法对细菌爆发规模的概率分布进行建模。
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2018 Aug;16(4):1850012. doi: 10.1142/S0219720018500129. Epub 2018 May 3.
10
Distributed Nash equilibrium seeking strategy with incomplete information.分布式纳什均衡寻求策略与不完全信息。
ISA Trans. 2022 Oct;129(Pt A):372-379. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2022.01.022. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Fairness in the use of limited resources during a pandemic.大流行期间有限资源的公平使用。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0270022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270022. eCollection 2022.
2
Model Selection for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Practical Considerations for Healthcare Settings.离线强化学习的模型选择:医疗环境中的实际考量
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2021 Aug;149:2-35.
3
An External Patient Healthcare Index (EPHI) for Simulating Spatial Tendencies in Healthcare Seeking Behavior.用于模拟医疗保健寻求行为空间趋势的外部患者医疗保健指数 (EPHI)。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;10:786467. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.786467. eCollection 2022.
4
The global need for essential emergency and critical care.全球对基本急诊和危重病护理的需求。
Crit Care. 2018 Oct 29;22(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2219-2.
5
A review of promoting access to medicines in China - problems and recommendations.中国促进药品可及性的回顾——问题与建议
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 20;18(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2875-6.
6
The primary health-care system in China.中国的基层医疗保健系统。
Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2584-2594. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33109-4. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
7
Explaining Accessibility and Satisfaction Related to Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Approach.解释与医疗保健相关的可及性和满意度:一种混合方法研究
Soc Indic Res. 2017;133(2):719-739. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1371-9. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
8
Evaluation on equality and efficiency of health resources allocation and health services utilization in China.中国卫生资源配置与卫生服务利用公平与效率评价
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jul 14;16(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0614-y.
9
Healthcare Access and Quality Index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2015: a novel analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.基于1990 - 2015年195个国家和地区可通过个人医疗保健预防的死因的医疗保健可及性和质量指数:全球疾病负担研究2015的一项新分析
Lancet. 2017 Jul 15;390(10091):231-266. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30818-8. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
China's Health Reform Update.中国医改新进展
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:431-448. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044247. Epub 2017 Jan 11.