• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Encoding of event roles from visual scenes is rapid, spontaneous, and interacts with higher-level visual processing.视觉场景中事件角色的编码是快速、自发的,并与高级视觉处理相互作用。
Cognition. 2018 Jun;175:36-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
2
Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.注意捕获不依赖于特征相似性,而是依赖于目标-非目标关系。
Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):634-47. doi: 10.1177/0956797612458528. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
3
Observation of another's action but not eye gaze triggers allocentric visual perspective.观察他人的动作而非目光注视会引发以他人为中心的视觉视角。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(12):2447-60. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.697905. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
4
Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.基于自上而下特征的视听同步辨别匹配特征选择。
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Mar 15;433(3):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.01.031. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
5
Electrophysiological revelations of trial history effects in a color oddball search task.颜色Oddball搜索任务中试次历史效应的电生理揭示
Psychophysiology. 2016 Dec;53(12):1878-1888. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12766. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
6
The rapid extraction of gist-early neural correlates of high-level visual processing.快速提取高层视觉处理的概要早期神经相关物。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb;24(2):521-9. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00100. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
7
Explicit awareness supports conditional visual search in the retrieval guidance paradigm.在检索引导范式中,明确意识支持条件性视觉搜索。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jan;145:44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
8
Emotional and neutral scenes in competition: orienting, efficiency, and identification.竞赛中的情绪性与中性场景:定向、效率与识别
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Dec;60(12):1585-93. doi: 10.1080/17470210701515868.
9
Anchoring visual search in scenes: Assessing the role of anchor objects on eye movements during visual search.将视觉搜索锚定在场景中:评估锚定对象在视觉搜索过程中对眼动的作用。
J Vis. 2018 Dec 3;18(13):11. doi: 10.1167/18.13.11.
10
Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.工作记忆编码会延迟自上而下的视觉皮层注意。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2593-604. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21621. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of spatial relations and motion information in social scene perception.社会场景感知中空间关系和运动信息的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 16;15(1):25817. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07870-1.
2
Spontaneous Encoding of Event Roles in Hominids.人科动物中事件角色的自发编码
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Apr 22;9:559-575. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00202. eCollection 2025.
3
The effect of animacy on the agent preference: Self-paced reading evidence from Basque.生命性对施事偏好的影响:来自巴斯克语的自定步速阅读证据。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01698-w.
4
Actions at a glance: The time course of action, object, and scene recognition in a free recall paradigm.一目了然的行为:自由回忆范式中行为、物体和场景识别的时间进程。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Feb 26. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01272-6.
5
Dynamicity Predicts Inferred Temporal Order in Complex Sentences: Evidence from English, German, and Polish.动态性预测复杂句子中的推断时间顺序:来自英语、德语和波兰语的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2025 Feb;49(2):e70038. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70038.
6
Neural encoding of semantic structures during sentence production.句子生成过程中语义结构的神经编码。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Dec 3;34(12). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae482.
7
Episodic recombination and the role of time in mental travel.片段重组与时间在心理旅行中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Nov 4;379(1913):20230409. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0409. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
8
Asymmetries in encoding event roles: Evidence from language and cognition.事件角色编码的不对称性:来自语言和认知的证据。
Cognition. 2024 Sep;250:105868. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105868. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
9
A Phone in a Basket Looks Like a Knife in a Cup: Role-Filler Independence in Visual Processing.篮子里的手机看起来像杯子里的刀:视觉处理中的角色填充独立性
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Jun 12;8:766-794. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00146. eCollection 2024.
10
A universal preference for animate agents in hominids.人类对有生命主体的普遍偏好。
iScience. 2024 May 16;27(6):109996. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109996. eCollection 2024 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceiving social interactions in the posterior superior temporal sulcus.在后上颞叶皮层感知社会互动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 24;114(43):E9145-E9152. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714471114. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
2
Categories and Constraints in Causal Perception.因果感知中的范畴与约束。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1649-1662. doi: 10.1177/0956797617719930. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
3
Not so secret agents: Event-related potentials to semantic roles in visual event comprehension.并非隐秘的特工:视觉事件理解中语义角色的事件相关电位
Brain Cogn. 2017 Dec;119:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
4
Neural Representations of Observed Actions Generalize across Static and Dynamic Visual Input.观察到的动作的神经表征在静态和动态视觉输入中具有普遍性。
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 15;37(11):3056-3071. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2496-16.2017. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
5
The Two-Body Inversion Effect.二体反转效应。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;28(3):369-379. doi: 10.1177/0956797616685769. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
6
Emergence of the ability to perceive dynamic events from still pictures in human infants.人类婴儿从静态图片中感知动态事件的能力的出现。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 17;6:37206. doi: 10.1038/srep37206.
7
Language Reflects "Core" Cognition: A New Theory About the Origin of Cross-Linguistic Regularities.语言反映“核心”认知:关于跨语言规律起源的新理论。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Jan;41(1):70-101. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12332. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
8
Rapid apprehension of the coherence of action scenes.迅速领会动作场景的连贯性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1566-1575. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1004-y.
9
MEG Multivariate Analysis Reveals Early Abstract Action Representations in the Lateral Occipitotemporal Cortex.脑磁图多元分析揭示枕颞外侧皮质早期抽象动作表征
J Neurosci. 2015 Dec 9;35(49):16034-45. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1422-15.2015.
10
The automaticity of perceiving animacy: Goal-directed motion in simple shapes influences visuomotor behavior even when task-irrelevant.感知生物性的自动性:简单形状中的目标导向运动即使与任务无关也会影响视觉运动行为。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Jun;23(3):797-802. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0966-5.

视觉场景中事件角色的编码是快速、自发的,并与高级视觉处理相互作用。

Encoding of event roles from visual scenes is rapid, spontaneous, and interacts with higher-level visual processing.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 425 S. University Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 425 S. University Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2018 Jun;175:36-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.011
PMID:29459238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5879027/
Abstract

A crucial component of event recognition is understanding event roles, i.e. who acted on whom: boy hitting girl is different from girl hitting boy. We often categorize Agents (i.e. the actor) and Patients (i.e. the one acted upon) from visual input, but do we rapidly and spontaneously encode such roles even when our attention is otherwise occupied? In three experiments, participants observed a continuous sequence of two-person scenes and had to search for a target actor in each (the male/female or red/blue-shirted actor) by indicating with a button press whether the target appeared on the left or the right. Critically, although role was orthogonal to gender and shirt color, and was never explicitly mentioned, participants responded more slowly when the target's role switched from trial to trial (e.g., the male went from being the Patient to the Agent). In a final experiment, we demonstrated that this effect cannot be fully explained by differences in posture associated with Agents and Patients. Our results suggest that extraction of event structure from visual scenes is rapid and spontaneous.

摘要

事件识别的一个关键组成部分是理解事件角色,即谁对谁采取了行动:男孩打女孩与女孩打男孩是不同的。我们通常根据视觉输入对主体(即行动者)和客体(即被行动者)进行分类,但即使我们的注意力被其他事物占据,我们是否能够快速而自发地编码这种角色呢?在三个实验中,参与者观察了连续的两人场景序列,并在每个场景中通过按钮按下指示目标主体(男性/女性或红/蓝衬衫主体)是否出现在左侧或右侧来搜索目标。至关重要的是,尽管角色与性别和衬衫颜色是正交的,并且从未被明确提及,但当目标的角色在试验之间切换时,参与者的反应会变慢(例如,男性从客体变成了主体)。在最后的实验中,我们证明了这一效应不能完全用与主体和客体相关的姿势差异来解释。我们的结果表明,从视觉场景中提取事件结构是快速而自发的。