• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗顺序重要吗?探究噬菌体增强抗生素对生物膜活性的能力。

Does Treatment Order Matter? Investigating the Ability of Bacteriophage to Augment Antibiotic Activity against Biofilms.

作者信息

Kumaran Dilini, Taha Mariam, Yi QiLong, Ramirez-Arcos Sandra, Diallo Jean-Simon, Carli Alberto, Abdelbary Hesham

机构信息

Center for Innovative Cancer Therapeutics, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Centre for Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2018 Feb 5;9:127. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00127. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00127
PMID:29459853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5807357/
Abstract

The inability to effectively treat biofilm-related infections is a major clinical challenge. This has been attributed to the heightened antibiotic tolerance conferred to bacterial cells embedded within biofilms. Lytic bacteriophages (phages) have evolved to effectively infect and eradicate biofilm-associated cells. The current study was designed to investigate the ability of phage treatment to enhance the activity of antibiotics against biofilm-forming . The biofilm positive strain ATCC 35556, the lytic phage SATA-8505, and five antibiotics (cefazolin, vancomycin, dicloxacillin, tetracycline, and linezolid), used to treat infections, were tested in this study. The ability of the SATA-8505 phage to augment the effect of these antibiotics against biofilm-associated cells was assessed by exposing them to one of the five following treatment strategies: (i) antibiotics alone, (ii) phage alone, (iii) a combination of the two treatments simultaneously, (iv) staggered exposure to the phage followed by antibiotics, and (v) staggered exposure to antibiotics followed by exposure to phage. The effect of each treatment strategy on biofilm cells was assessed by enumerating viable bacterial cells. The results demonstrate that the treatment of biofilms with either SATA-8505, antibiotics, or both simultaneously resulted in minimal reduction of viable biofilm-associated cells. However, a significant reduction [up to 3 log colony forming unit (CFU)/mL] was observed when the phage treatment preceded antibiotics. This effect was most pronounced with vancomycin and cefazolin which exhibited synergistic interactions with SATA-8505, particularly at lower antibiotic concentrations. This study provides proof of principle for the ability of phages to augment the activity of antibiotics against biofilms. Our results also demonstrate that therapeutic outcomes can be influenced by the sequence in which these therapeutic agents are administered, and the nature of their interactions. Further investigation into the interactions between lytic phages and antibiotics against various biofilm-forming organisms is important to direct future clinical translation of efficacious antibiotic-phage combination therapeutic strategies.

摘要

无法有效治疗生物膜相关感染是一项重大临床挑战。这归因于生物膜内细菌细胞所具有的增强的抗生素耐受性。裂解性噬菌体已进化到能有效感染和根除与生物膜相关的细胞。本研究旨在调查噬菌体治疗增强抗生素对生物膜形成菌活性的能力。本研究测试了生物膜阳性菌株ATCC 35556、裂解性噬菌体SATA - 8505以及用于治疗感染的五种抗生素(头孢唑林、万古霉素、双氯西林、四环素和利奈唑胺)。通过将它们暴露于以下五种治疗策略之一来评估SATA - 8505噬菌体增强这些抗生素对生物膜相关菌细胞作用的能力:(i)单独使用抗生素,(ii)单独使用噬菌体,(iii)两种治疗同时联合使用,(iv)先接触噬菌体再接触抗生素,(v)先接触抗生素再接触噬菌体。通过计数活细菌细胞来评估每种治疗策略对生物膜细胞的影响。结果表明,单独使用SATA - 8505、抗生素或两者同时使用对生物膜相关活细胞的减少作用极小。然而,当噬菌体治疗先于抗生素时,观察到显著减少[高达3个对数集落形成单位(CFU)/mL]。这种效应在万古霉素和头孢唑林上最为明显,它们与SATA - 8505表现出协同相互作用,尤其是在较低抗生素浓度下。本研究为噬菌体增强抗生素对生物膜活性的能力提供了原理证明。我们的结果还表明,治疗效果可受这些治疗剂给药顺序及其相互作用性质的影响。进一步研究裂解性噬菌体与抗生素针对各种生物膜形成菌之间的相互作用对于指导有效的抗生素 - 噬菌体联合治疗策略未来的临床转化很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a52/5807357/25640b335468/fmicb-09-00127-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a52/5807357/cb7386f75db9/fmicb-09-00127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a52/5807357/001e62f79b32/fmicb-09-00127-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a52/5807357/3603d3ef903d/fmicb-09-00127-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a52/5807357/5afc6a68309c/fmicb-09-00127-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a52/5807357/25640b335468/fmicb-09-00127-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a52/5807357/cb7386f75db9/fmicb-09-00127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a52/5807357/001e62f79b32/fmicb-09-00127-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a52/5807357/3603d3ef903d/fmicb-09-00127-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a52/5807357/5afc6a68309c/fmicb-09-00127-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a52/5807357/25640b335468/fmicb-09-00127-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Treatment Order Matter? Investigating the Ability of Bacteriophage to Augment Antibiotic Activity against Biofilms.治疗顺序重要吗?探究噬菌体增强抗生素对生物膜活性的能力。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Feb 5;9:127. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00127. eCollection 2018.
2
Bacteriophage Sb-1 enhances antibiotic activity against biofilm, degrades exopolysaccharide matrix and targets persisters of Staphylococcus aureus.噬菌体 Sb-1 增强了抗生素对生物膜的活性,降解了胞外多糖基质,并靶向了金黄色葡萄球菌的持久性细菌。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Dec;52(6):842-853. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
3
Eradication of Biofilm-Mediated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections : Bacteriophage-Antibiotic Combination.消除生物膜介导的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染:噬菌体-抗生素联合疗法。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0041122. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00411-22. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
4
Evaluation of Staphylococcal Bacteriophage Sb-1 as an Adjunctive Agent to Antibiotics Against Rifampin-Resistant Biofilms.评估葡萄球菌噬菌体Sb-1作为抗生素辅助剂对抗利福平耐药生物膜的效果。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Nov 11;11:602057. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.602057. eCollection 2020.
5
Combining bacteriophage and vancomycin is efficacious against MRSA biofilm-like aggregates formed in synovial fluid.将噬菌体和万古霉素联合使用对在滑液中形成的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜样聚集体有效。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 9;10:1134912. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1134912. eCollection 2023.
6
Evaluation of the Activity of a Combination of Three Bacteriophages Alone or in Association with Antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus Embedded in Biofilm or Internalized in Osteoblasts.评价三种噬菌体单独或联合抗生素对生物膜包埋或骨细胞内内化金黄色葡萄球菌的活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Feb 21;64(3). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02231-19.
7
Overcoming bacteriophage insensitivity in Staphylococcus aureus using clindamycin and azithromycinat subinhibitory concentrations.以低于最低抑菌浓度的克林霉素和阿奇霉素克服金黄色葡萄球菌对噬菌体的不敏感性。
Allergy. 2021 Nov;76(11):3446-3458. doi: 10.1111/all.14883. Epub 2021 May 16.
8
Synergistic Action of Phage and Antibiotics: Parameters to Enhance the Killing Efficacy Against Mono and Dual-Species Biofilms.噬菌体与抗生素的协同作用:提高对单菌种和双菌种生物膜杀灭效果的参数
Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Jul 25;8(3):103. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8030103.
9
Bacteriophage reduces biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus ex vivo isolates from chronic rhinosinusitis patients.噬菌体可减少慢性鼻窦炎患者离体分离的金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(1):3-11. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4001.
10
Evaluation of Bacteriophage Anti-Biofilm Activity for Potential Control of Orthopedic Implant-Related Infections Caused by Staphylococcus aureus.评估噬菌体抗生物膜活性对潜在控制金黄色葡萄球菌引起的骨科植入物相关感染的作用
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Jan;20(1):16-24. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.135. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent insights on challenges encountered with phage therapy against gastrointestinal-associated infections.噬菌体疗法治疗胃肠道相关感染所面临挑战的最新见解。
Gut Pathog. 2025 Aug 11;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13099-025-00735-y.
2
Combined Forces Against Bacteria: Phages and Antibiotics.对抗细菌的联合力量:噬菌体与抗生素
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 9;8(7):e70956. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70956. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Efficacy of phage therapy in controlling staphylococcal biofilms: a systematic review.噬菌体疗法在控制葡萄球菌生物膜方面的疗效:一项系统综述。

本文引用的文献

1
A Review of Phage Therapy against Bacterial Pathogens of Aquatic and Terrestrial Organisms.针对水生和陆生生物细菌病原体的噬菌体疗法综述
Viruses. 2017 Mar 18;9(3):50. doi: 10.3390/v9030050.
2
Synergy and Order Effects of Antibiotics and Phages in Killing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.抗生素与噬菌体联合杀灭铜绿假单胞菌生物被膜的协同作用及顺序效应
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0168615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168615. eCollection 2017.
3
Co-loaded proteinase K/thyme oil liposomes for inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 biofilms on cucumber.
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jul 9;30(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02781-3.
4
The Current Landscape of Phage-Antibiotic Synergistic (PAS) Interactions.噬菌体 - 抗生素协同(PAS)相互作用的当前态势
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 May 27;14(6):545. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14060545.
5
The virulent bacteriophage Henu8 as an antimicrobial synergist against .烈性噬菌体Henu8作为一种抗……的抗菌增效剂 。 你提供的原文似乎不完整,“against”后面缺少具体内容。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0163324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01633-24. Epub 2025 May 16.
6
One-Two Punch: Phage-Antibiotic Synergy Observed against by Combining Pleurotin and Phage K.组合普列鲁托菌素和噬菌体K观察到对……的噬菌体-抗生素协同作用:双重打击
ACS Omega. 2025 Mar 18;10(12):12026-12036. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c09831. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
7
Efficacy of Three Kayviruses Against Strains Isolated from COVID-19 Patients.三种肠道病毒对从新冠肺炎患者中分离出的毒株的疗效。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Mar 3;14(3):257. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030257.
8
Response of to combination of virulent bacteriophage vB_SauM-515A1 and linezolid.[未提及的对象]对烈性噬菌体vB_SauM - 515A1与利奈唑胺联合用药的反应。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Dec 20;15:1519312. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1519312. eCollection 2024.
9
resensitization of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of and through phage-antibiotic synergy.通过噬菌体 - 抗生素协同作用使金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的多重耐药临床分离株重新致敏。 (注:原文中“and”前后缺少具体细菌名称,这里补充为常见的金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌以便完整表意)
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Feb 13;69(2):e0074024. doi: 10.1128/aac.00740-24. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
10
Biofilm Production in Intensive Care Units: Challenges and Implications.重症监护病房中的生物膜形成:挑战与影响
Pathogens. 2024 Nov 1;13(11):954. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13110954.
共载蛋白酶K/百里香油脂质体用于灭活黄瓜上的大肠杆菌O157:H7生物膜
Food Funct. 2016 Sep 14;7(9):4030-4040. doi: 10.1039/c6fo01201a.
4
In Vivo Assessment of Phage and Linezolid Based Implant Coatings for Treatment of Methicillin Resistant S. aureus (MRSA) Mediated Orthopaedic Device Related Infections.基于噬菌体和利奈唑胺的植入物涂层治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)介导的骨科器械相关感染的体内评估
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 22;11(6):e0157626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157626. eCollection 2016.
5
Phage selection restores antibiotic sensitivity in MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa.噬菌体筛选可恢复多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌的抗生素敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2016 May 26;6:26717. doi: 10.1038/srep26717.
6
A century of the phage: past, present and future.一个世纪的噬菌体:过去、现在和未来。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015 Dec;13(12):777-86. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3564. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
7
Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: recent developments in biofilm dispersal.金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜:生物膜分散的最新进展
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014 Dec 23;4:178. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00178. eCollection 2014.
8
A window of opportunity to control the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa combining antibiotics and phages.将抗生素与噬菌体联合使用以控制细菌病原体铜绿假单胞菌的机遇之窗。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e106628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106628. eCollection 2014.
9
Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics.生物膜相关感染:弥合临床管理与对抗生素顽固性的基本方面之间的差距。
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2014 Sep;78(3):510-43. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00013-14.
10
Bacteriophages as an alternative strategy for fighting biofilm development.噬菌体作为对抗生物膜形成的一种替代策略。
Pol J Microbiol. 2014;63(2):137-45.