Suppr超能文献

近视性人工晶状体单眼视的双眼视觉功能

Binocular visual function of myopic pseudophakic monovision.

作者信息

Hayashi Ken, Yoshida Motoaki, Sasaki Hiroshi, Hirata Akira

机构信息

Hayashi Eye Hospital, 4-23-35 Hakataekimae, Hakata-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-0011, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018 May;62(3):357-364. doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0564-y. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare binocular visual function of myopic pseudophakic patients with myopic monovision to patients without monovision.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized comparative study METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized to one of two groups: patients whose refraction was targeted to -2.75 diopters (D) in the dominant eye and -1.75D in the nondominant eye (myopic monovision group), and patients whose refraction was targeted to -2.75D bilaterally (non-monovision group). Binocular uncorrected and corrected visual acuity at various distances was measured using an all-distance vision tester, and contrast visual acuity and near stereoacuity were examined.

RESULTS

In the myopic monovision group mean refraction was -2.74D in the dominant eyes and -1.94D in the nondominant eyes, and in the non-monovision group it was -2.96D bilaterally. Mean binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA) and intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) from 0.5 m to 5.0 m were significantly better in the myopic monovision group than in the non-monovision group (P≤ 0.0134), while binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 0.3 m did not differ significantly between groups. The distribution of UIVA and UDVA was significantly better in the myopic monovision group (P≤ 0.0035). Corrected visual acuity at any distance, photopic and mesopic contrast visual acuity, and stereoacuity did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with myopic monovision exhibited significantly better binocular UIVA and UDVA than those without monovision, while UNVA, corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and stereoacuity were comparable between groups, suggesting that this method is useful for patients who want to see near and intermediate distances without spectacles.

摘要

目的

比较近视人工晶状体植入单眼视患者与非单眼视患者的双眼视觉功能。

研究设计

随机对照研究

方法

60例患者被随机分为两组:一组是主导眼屈光矫正至-2.75屈光度(D)、非主导眼矫正至-1.75D的患者(近视单眼视组),另一组是双眼屈光矫正至-2.75D的患者(非单眼视组)。使用全距离视力测试仪测量不同距离下的双眼未矫正和矫正视力,并检测对比视力和近立体视锐度。

结果

近视单眼视组主导眼平均屈光为-2.74D,非主导眼为-1.94D;非单眼视组双眼平均屈光为-2.96D。近视单眼视组从0.5米到5.0米的双眼未矫正远距离(UDVA)和中距离视力(UIVA)显著优于非单眼视组(P≤0.0134),而两组在0.3米处的双眼未矫正近视力(UNVA)无显著差异。近视单眼视组UIVA和UDVA的分布明显更好(P≤0.0035)。两组在任何距离的矫正视力、明视和中视对比视力以及立体视锐度均无显著差异。

结论

近视单眼视患者的双眼UIVA和UDVA显著优于非单眼视患者,而两组的UNVA、矫正视力、对比敏感度和立体视锐度相当,这表明该方法对那些希望不戴眼镜就能看清中近距离的患者有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验