Suppr超能文献

津巴布韦一个野生动物/家畜交界地区牛及部分野生动物衣原体病血清流行率

Sero-prevalence of chlamydiosis in cattle and selected wildlife species at a wildlife/livestock interface area of Zimbabwe.

作者信息

Ndengu Masimba, Matope Gift, Tivapasi Musavengana, Scacchia Massimo, Bonfini Barbara, Pfukenyi Davis Mubika, de Garine-Wichatitsky Michel

机构信息

Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Research Platform Production and Conservation in Partnership, P.O. Box 1378, Harare, Zimbabwe.

出版信息

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2018 Jun;50(5):1107-1117. doi: 10.1007/s11250-018-1536-4. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

Abstract

A study was conducted to investigate the seroprevalence and associated risk factors of Chlamydia abortus infection in cattle and some selected wildlife species at selected interface areas at the periphery of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area in Zimbabwe. Three study sites were selected based on the type of livestock-wildlife interface, porous livestock-wildlife interface (unrestricted), non-porous livestock-wildlife interface (restricted by fencing), and livestock-wildlife non-interface (totally absent or control). Sera were collected from cattle aged ≥ 2 years representing both female and intact male. Sera were also collected from selected wild ungulates from Mabalauta (porous interface) and Chipinda Pools (non-interface) areas of the Gonarezhou National Park. Sera were tested for antibodies to Chlamydia abortus using a CFT. A X test was used to assess differences between categories and p < 0.05 was considered as significant. In cattle, the overall seroprevalence was 32.7% (327/1011; 95% CI 29.5-35.3). A significantly lower seroprevalence was recorded for the porous interface (24.2%) compared to the non-porous (42.5%) (p < 0.0001) and the non-interface (36.2%) (p = 0.001). Overall, the wet season recorded a significantly (p = 0.015) higher seroprevalence than the dry season. In wildlife, antibodies were detected in buffaloes (47.7%) and impalas (43.8%) but not in kudus. Buffaloes from Chipinda Pools (53.4%) had a significantly (p = 0.036) higher seroprevalence than those from Mabalauta (26.1%). The results established the presence of chlamydiosis in cattle and selected wildlife and that independent infections may be maintained in buffalo populations. Further studies are required to clarify chlamydiae circulating between cattle and wildlife.

摘要

在津巴布韦大林波波跨界保护区周边选定的交界地区,开展了一项研究,以调查牛及一些选定野生动物物种中流产衣原体感染的血清流行率及相关风险因素。根据家畜 - 野生动物交界类型,选择了三个研究地点,即多孔家畜 - 野生动物交界(无限制)、无孔家畜 - 野生动物交界(由围栏限制)和家畜 - 野生动物无交界(完全不存在或对照)。从年龄≥2岁的牛中采集血清,包括雌性和未阉割的雄性。还从戈纳雷州国家公园的马巴拉乌塔(多孔交界)和奇平达池(无交界)地区的选定野生有蹄类动物中采集血清。使用补体结合试验检测血清中抗流产衣原体的抗体。采用X检验评估类别之间的差异,p < 0.05被认为具有显著性。在牛中,总体血清流行率为32.7%(327/1011;95%可信区间29.5 - 35.3)。与无孔交界(42.5%)(p < 0.0001)和无交界(36.2%)(p = 0.001)相比,多孔交界的血清流行率显著较低(24.2%)。总体而言,雨季的血清流行率显著高于旱季(p = 0.015)。在野生动物中,在水牛(47.7%)和黑斑羚(43.8%)中检测到抗体,但在捻角羚中未检测到。来自奇平达池的水牛(53.4%)的血清流行率显著高于来自马巴拉乌塔的水牛(26.1%)(p = 0.036)。结果证实牛和选定野生动物中存在衣原体病,并且水牛种群中可能维持独立感染。需要进一步研究以阐明牛和野生动物之间传播的衣原体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验