• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Selection in Health Insurance Markets and Its Policy Remedies.

作者信息

Geruso Michael, Layton Timothy J

机构信息

University of Texas, Austin, Texas.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Econ Perspect. 2017;31(4):23-50. doi: 10.1257/jep.31.4.23.

DOI:10.1257/jep.31.4.23
PMID:29465215
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10898225/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Selection in Health Insurance Markets and Its Policy Remedies.健康保险市场中的选择及其政策补救措施。
J Econ Perspect. 2017;31(4):23-50. doi: 10.1257/jep.31.4.23.
2
HHS could run half of state exchanges, and that could benefit health plans.美国卫生与公众服务部（HHS）可以运营一半的州医保市场，这可能会使医保计划受益。
Manag Care. 2012 Sep;21(9):5-6.
3
Access to health insurance.获得医疗保险。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2014 Dec 29:1-58.
4
Continuing to improve risk adjustment.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):1126; author reply 1126. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0371.
5
Access to Health Insurance.获得医疗保险。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2016 Dec 27;2016:1-58.
6
Adjusting for risk selection in state health insurance exchanges will be critically important and feasible, but not easy.在州健康保险交易所中进行风险选择调整将是至关重要且可行的，但并不容易。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Feb;31(2):306-15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0420.
7
Building the Coverage Continuum: The Role of State Medicaid Directors and Insurance Commissioners.构建覆盖连续体：州医疗补助主任和保险专员的作用。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Feb;4:1-10.
8
Health insurance is dead; long live health insurance.
Am J Law Med. 2014;40(2-3):195-214. doi: 10.1177/009885881404000202.
9
Healthcare Reform. Administrative Rulemaking.
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2018 Dec 24;2018:1-48.
10
GHLIT medical insurance coverage.全球卫生人力联盟医疗保险覆盖范围。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013 Apr 1;242(7):912.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse selection and network design under regulated plan prices: Evidence from Medicaid.管制计划价格下的逆向选择与网络设计：来自医疗补助计划的证据。
J Health Econ. 2024 Sep;97:102901. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102901. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
2
Scope and Incentives for Risk Selection in Health Insurance Markets With Regulated Competition: A Conceptual Framework and International Comparison.具有监管竞争的健康保险市场中的风险选择范围和激励措施：概念框架与国际比较。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Jun;81(3):175-194. doi: 10.1177/10775587231222584. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
3
Heterogeneity within the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: An application of causal forests.

本文引用的文献

1
Demand heterogeneity in insurance markets: Implications for equity and efficiency.保险市场中的需求异质性：对公平与效率的影响。
Quant Econom. 2017 Nov;8(3):929-975. doi: 10.3982/qe794. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
Healthcare Rationing in Public Insurance Programs: Evidence from Medicaid.公共保险计划中的医疗保健配给：来自医疗补助计划的证据。
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2022 Nov;14(4):397-431. doi: 10.1257/pol.20190628.
3
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Neurotrauma: Research Priorities in the New York Metropolitan Area Through a Global Neurosurgery Paradigm.
俄勒冈健康保险实验中的异质性：因果森林的应用。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 18;19(1):e0297205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297205. eCollection 2024.
4
Risk adjustment for regional healthcare funding allocations with ensemble methods: an empirical study and interpretation.基于集成方法的区域医疗保健资金分配风险调整：实证研究与解释。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Sep;25(7):1117-1131. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01656-w. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
5
What Difference Does a Health Plan Make? Evidence from Random Plan Assignment in Medicaid.健康保险计划能带来什么不同？来自医疗补助计划中随机分配保险计划的证据。
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2023 Jul;15(3):341-379. doi: 10.1257/app.20210843.
6
Pricing regulations in individual health insurance: Evidence from Medigap.个人医疗保险定价法规：来自补充医疗保险的证据。
J Health Econ. 2023 Sep;91:102785. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102785. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
7
The Two-Margin Problem in Insurance Markets.保险市场中的双边问题。
Rev Econ Stat. 2023 Mar;105(2):237-257. doi: 10.1162/rest_a_01070. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Plan Selection, Enrollee Risk, and Health Spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Individual Marketplaces, 2019.《2019 年患者保护与平价医疗法案个人市场的计划选择、参保人风险与医疗支出》
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e234529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4529.
9
Adverse selection and health insurance decisions of young migrant workers: An empirical study in China.年轻外来务工人员的逆向选择与医疗保险决策：基于中国的实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 7;11:1084133. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1084133. eCollection 2023.
10
Healthcare Rationing in Public Insurance Programs: Evidence from Medicaid.公共保险计划中的医疗保健配给：来自医疗补助计划的证据。
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2022 Nov;14(4):397-431. doi: 10.1257/pol.20190628.
神经创伤中的种族和社会经济差异：通过全球神经外科学范式研究纽约大都市区的优先事项。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Sep;165:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.031. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
4
The Imperfect Science of Evaluating Performance: How Bad and Who Cares?
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Mar;175(3):448-449. doi: 10.7326/M21-4665. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Healthcare Cost Reduction and Health Insurance Policy Improvement.医疗成本降低与健康保险政策改善
Value Health Reg Issues. 2022 May;29:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
6
Screening in Contract Design: Evidence from the ACA Health Insurance Exchanges.合同设计中的筛选：来自《平价医疗法案》医疗保险交易所的证据。
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2019 May;11(2):64-107. doi: 10.1257/pol.20170014.
7
Upcoding: Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment.高编计费：来自医疗保险关于模糊风险调整的证据。
J Polit Econ. 2020 Mar;12(3):984-1026. doi: 10.1086/704756. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
8
Same Game, Different Names: Cream-Skimming in the Post-ACA Individual Health Insurance Market.同名不同实：ACA 后个体健康保险市场中的择客承保。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020933765. doi: 10.1177/0046958020933765.
9
Modest risk-sharing significantly reduces health plans' incentives for service distortion.适度的风险分担显著降低了健康计划扭曲服务的动机。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Dec;20(9):1359-1374. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01102-w. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
10
Incorporating Prescription Drug Utilization Information Into the Marketplace Risk Adjustment Model Improves Payment Accuracy and Reduces Adverse Selection Incentives.将处方药使用信息纳入市场风险调整模型可提高支付准确性并降低逆向选择激励。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Aug;78(4):381-391. doi: 10.1177/1077558719870060. Epub 2019 Aug 22.