• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Two-Margin Problem in Insurance Markets.保险市场中的双边问题。
Rev Econ Stat. 2023 Mar;105(2):237-257. doi: 10.1162/rest_a_01070. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
2
ESTIMATING WELFARE IN INSURANCE MARKETS USING VARIATION IN PRICES.利用价格变化估计保险市场中的福利
Q J Econ. 2010 Aug 1;125(3):877-921. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.877.
3
Imperfect risk adjustment, risk preferences, and sorting in competitive health insurance markets.竞争性医疗保险市场中的不完善风险调整、风险偏好和选择。
J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:259-280. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.04.004.
4
Demand heterogeneity in insurance markets: Implications for equity and efficiency.保险市场中的需求异质性:对公平与效率的影响。
Quant Econom. 2017 Nov;8(3):929-975. doi: 10.3982/qe794. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
5
Selection in insurance markets: theory and empirics in pictures.保险市场的选择:理论与实证图片集。
J Econ Perspect. 2011 Winter;25(1):115-38. doi: 10.1257/jep.25.1.115.
6
High-risk individuals in voluntary health insurance markets: the elephant in the room?
Health Econ Policy Law. 2025 May 15:1-14. doi: 10.1017/S1744133125000118.
7
Trade margins of rubber exporters: The case of Indonesia.橡胶出口商的贸易利差:以印度尼西亚为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0292160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292160. eCollection 2023.
8
Farm systems assessment of bioenergy feedstock production: Integrating bio-economic models and life cycle analysis approaches.生物能源原料生产的农场系统评估:整合生物经济模型与生命周期分析方法
Agric Syst. 2012 Jun;109:53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.02.005.
9
Measuring efficiency of health plan payment systems in managed competition health insurance markets.衡量管理竞争型医疗保险市场中健康计划支付系统的效率。
J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:237-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.05.004.
10
Optimal Mandates and The Welfare Cost of Asymmetric Information: Evidence from The U.K. Annuity Market.最优授权与信息不对称的福利成本:来自英国年金市场的证据
Econometrica. 2010 May 1;78(3):1031-1092. doi: 10.3982/ECTA7245.

引用本文的文献

1
A framework for ex-ante evaluation of the potential effects of risk equalization and risk sharing in health insurance markets with regulated competition.一个用于对具有监管竞争的健康保险市场中风险均等化和风险分担的潜在影响进行事前评估的框架。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00540-4.
2
Scope and Incentives for Risk Selection in Health Insurance Markets With Regulated Competition: A Conceptual Framework and International Comparison.具有监管竞争的健康保险市场中的风险选择范围和激励措施:概念框架与国际比较。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Jun;81(3):175-194. doi: 10.1177/10775587231222584. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
3
Can Automatic Retention Improve Health Insurance Market Outcomes?自动保留能否改善健康保险市场的结果?
AEA Pap Proc. 2021 May;111:560-566. doi: 10.1257/pandp.20211083.
4
When Should There Be Vertical Choice in Health Insurance Markets?健康保险市场何时应存在纵向选择?
Am Econ Rev. 2022 Jan;112(1):304-342. doi: 10.1257/aer.20201073.

本文引用的文献

1
Demand heterogeneity in insurance markets: Implications for equity and efficiency.保险市场中的需求异质性:对公平与效率的影响。
Quant Econom. 2017 Nov;8(3):929-975. doi: 10.3982/qe794. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
Screening in Contract Design: Evidence from the ACA Health Insurance Exchanges.合同设计中的筛选:来自《平价医疗法案》医疗保险交易所的证据。
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2019 May;11(2):64-107. doi: 10.1257/pol.20170014.
3
Upcoding: Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment.高编计费:来自医疗保险关于模糊风险调整的证据。
J Polit Econ. 2020 Mar;12(3):984-1026. doi: 10.1086/704756. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
4
Open enrollment periods and plan choices.开放注册期和计划选择。
Health Econ. 2020 Jul;29(7):733-747. doi: 10.1002/hec.4014. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
5
Subsidizing Health Insurance for Low-Income Adults: Evidence from Massachusetts.为低收入成年人补贴医疗保险:来自马萨诸塞州的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2019 Apr;109(4):1530-67.
6
Strategic Formulary Design in Medicare Part D Plans.医疗保险D部分计划中的战略处方集设计。
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2018 Aug;10(3):154-192. doi: 10.1257/pol.20160248.
7
Health Insurance for "Humans": Information Frictions, Plan Choice, and Consumer Welfare.医疗保险“人”:信息摩擦、计划选择和消费者福利。
Am Econ Rev. 2015 Aug;105(8):2449-500. doi: 10.1257/aer.20131126.
8
Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts.医疗保险市场中的逆向选择和惯性:当推动反而有害。
Am Econ Rev. 2013 Dec;103(7):2643-82. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.7.2643.
9
Pricing and Welfare in Health Plan Choice.健康计划选择中的定价与福利
Am Econ Rev. 2012 Dec;102(7):3214-48. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.7.3214.
10
Selection in Health Insurance Markets and Its Policy Remedies.健康保险市场中的选择及其政策补救措施。
J Econ Perspect. 2017;31(4):23-50. doi: 10.1257/jep.31.4.23.

保险市场中的双边问题。

The Two-Margin Problem in Insurance Markets.

作者信息

Geruso Michael, Layton Timothy J, McCormack Grace, Shepard Mark

机构信息

University of Texas at Austin and NBER.

Harvard University and NBER.

出版信息

Rev Econ Stat. 2023 Mar;105(2):237-257. doi: 10.1162/rest_a_01070. Epub 2021 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1162/rest_a_01070
PMID:37193577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10181796/
Abstract

Insurance markets often feature consumer sorting along both an extensive margin (whether to buy) and an intensive margin (which plan to buy). We present a new graphical theoretical framework that extends a workhorse model to incorporate both selection margins simultaneously. A key insight from our framework is that policies aimed at addressing one margin of selection often involve an economically meaningful trade-off on the other margin in terms of prices, enrollment, and welfare. Using data from Massachusetts, we illustrate these trade-offs in an empirical sufficient statistics approach that is tightly linked to the graphical framework we develop.

摘要

保险市场通常具有消费者在广度边际(是否购买)和深度边际(购买哪种保险计划)上的分类特征。我们提出了一个新的图形化理论框架,该框架扩展了一个常用模型,以同时纳入这两个选择边际。我们框架的一个关键见解是,旨在解决一个选择边际的政策,在价格、参保人数和福利方面,往往在另一个边际上涉及具有经济意义的权衡。利用来自马萨诸塞州的数据,我们通过一种与我们开发的图形框架紧密相关的实证充分统计方法来说明这些权衡。