Suppr超能文献

2005 年至 2016 年间,阿姆斯特丹性传播感染诊所就诊的女性和男性性侵犯受害者的性传播感染阳性率和治疗吸收率。

Sexually Transmitted Infection Positivity Rate and Treatment Uptake Among Female and Male Sexual Assault Victims Attending The Amsterdam STI Clinic Between 2005 and 2016.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Aug;45(8):534-541. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000794.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Victims could become infected with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) during a sexual assault. Several guidelines recommend presumptive antimicrobial therapy for sexual assault victims (SAVs). We assessed the STI positivity rate and treatment uptake of female and male SAVs at the Amsterdam STI clinic.

METHODS

Sexual assault victims answered assault-related questions and were tested for bacterial STI (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis), hepatitis B, and HIV during their initial visits. Sexual assault victim characteristics were compared with non-SAV clients. Backward multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess whether being an SAV was associated with a bacterial STI. The proportion of those returning for treatment was calculated.

RESULTS

From January 2005 to September 2016, 1066 (0.6%) of 168,915 and 135 (0.07%) of 196,184 consultations involved female and male SAVs, respectively. Among female SAVs, the STI positivity rate was 11.2% versus 11.6% among non-SAVs (P = 0.65). Among male SAVs, the STI positivity rate was 12.6% versus 17.7% among non-SAVs (P = 0.12). In multivariable analysis, female SAVs did not have increased odds for an STI (odds ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.13), and male SAVs had significantly lower odds for an STI (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.98). Of SAVs requiring treatment, 89.0% (female) and 92.0% (male) returned.

CONCLUSIONS

The STI positivity rate among female SAVs was comparable with female non-SAVs, but male SAVs had lower odds for having a bacterial STI than did male non-SAVs, when adjusting for confounders. The return rate of SAV for treatment was high and therefore does not support the recommendations for presumptive therapy.

摘要

背景

性侵犯中受害者可能会感染性传播感染(STI)。有几个指南建议对性侵犯受害者(SAV)进行推定抗菌治疗。我们评估了阿姆斯特丹性传播感染诊所的女性和男性 SAV 的性传播感染阳性率和治疗吸收率。

方法

性侵犯受害者在初次就诊时回答与性侵犯相关的问题,并接受细菌性 STI(衣原体、淋病和梅毒)、乙型肝炎和 HIV 检测。比较 SAV 患者和非 SAV 患者的特征。进行向后多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估是否为 SAV 与细菌 STI 相关。计算返回治疗的比例。

结果

从 2005 年 1 月至 2016 年 9 月,在 168915 次就诊中有 1066 次(0.6%)涉及女性 SAV,在 196184 次就诊中有 135 次(0.07%)涉及男性 SAV。在女性 SAV 中,性传播感染阳性率为 11.2%,而非 SAV 为 11.6%(P=0.65)。在男性 SAV 中,性传播感染阳性率为 12.6%,而非 SAV 为 17.7%(P=0.12)。在多变量分析中,女性 SAV 发生性传播感染的几率没有增加(比值比 0.94;95%置信区间,0.77-1.13),而男性 SAV 发生性传播感染的几率显著降低(比值比,0.60;95%置信区间,0.36-0.98)。需要治疗的 SAV 中,89.0%(女性)和 92.0%(男性)返回。

结论

在调整混杂因素后,女性 SAV 的性传播感染阳性率与女性非 SAV 相当,但男性 SAV 发生细菌性 STI 的几率低于男性非 SAV。SAV 接受治疗的返回率很高,因此不支持推定治疗的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b4c/6075899/04e0dccbc748/olq-45-534-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验