Sex Transm Dis. 2018 May;45(5):294-300. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000739.
Sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates are increasing in the United States while funding for prevention and treatment programs has declined. Sample self-collection for STI testing in men may provide an acceptable, easy, rapid, and potentially cost-effective method for increasing diagnosis and treatment of STIs.
We conducted a systematic review of articles assessing self-collection of anal, oral, or genital swab samples among adult men for detection of STIs and/or human papillomavirus-related dysplasia. We searched for English-language articles in which men 18 years or older were recruited to participate.
Our literature search resulted in 1053 citations, with 20 meeting inclusion criteria. Self-collection methods were highly sensitive and comparable with clinician collection for detection of multiple STI pathogens. However, self-collected samples were less likely to be of adequate quality for anorectal cytology and less sensitive for detection of anal intraepithelial neoplasia than clinician-collected samples. Self-collection was highly acceptable. Overall, studies were small and heterogeneous and used designs providing lower levels of evidence.
Self-collection methods are a viable option for collecting samples for STI testing in adult men based on their high feasibility, acceptability, and validity. Implementation of self-collection procedures in STI testing venues should be performed to expand opportunities for STI detection and treatment.
在美国,性传播感染(STI)的发病率正在上升,而预防和治疗项目的资金却在减少。男性样本自我采集用于 STI 检测可能是一种可接受、简便、快速且具有潜在成本效益的方法,可提高 STI 的诊断和治疗水平。
我们对评估成年男性自我采集肛拭子、咽拭子或生殖器拭子样本以检测 STI 和/或人乳头瘤病毒相关发育不良的文章进行了系统评价。我们搜索了以 18 岁及以上男性为研究对象的英文文章。
我们的文献检索共得到 1053 条引文,其中 20 条符合纳入标准。自我采集方法对多种 STI 病原体的检测具有较高的敏感性,且与临床医生采集方法相当。然而,自我采集的样本用于直肠细胞学检查的质量往往不如临床医生采集的样本,且对肛门上皮内瘤变的检测敏感性也较低。自我采集的方法被高度认可。总体而言,这些研究规模较小且存在异质性,采用的设计提供的证据水平较低。
自我采集方法在成年男性 STI 检测中是一种可行的样本采集方法,其具有较高的可行性、可接受性和有效性。应在 STI 检测场所实施自我采集程序,以增加 STI 的检测和治疗机会。