a Shenzhen Public Service Platform of Precision Medicine and Molecular Diagnosis on Tumor, the Second Clinical College of Jinan University & Shenzhen People's Hospital , Shenzhen , People's Republic of China.
b Department of Ultrasound , The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University & Shenzhen People's Hospital , Shenzhen , People's Republic of China.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 May;18(4):579-586. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1436196. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
To evaluate the value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL injury) by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. A literature search was carried out in the Cochrane Library, Embase, Pubmed databases and included studies prior to April 2017. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, studies evaluating ultrasound to diagnose ACL injury were selected. MRI, arthroscopy and clinical-follow were considered the reference standards. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound was assessed using a combination of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio (LR), post-test probability, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and by summarizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. A total of 4 studies involving 246 patients were eventually included in the analysis. In these four studies, the combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, post-test probability and DOR were 90.0% (95% CI: 77-96), 97% (95% CI: 90-99), 31.08 (95% CI: 8.75-110.41), 0.11 (95% CI: 0.05-0.24), 89% (3%) and 288.81 (95% CI: 78.51-1062.48), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99). Our meta-analysis showed that ultrasound can play an important role in the diagnosis of ACL injury. Because of its high sensitivity, high specificity and high diagnostic ability, ultrasound should be a part of the standard diagnostic work-up of an ACL injury.
通过系统评价和荟萃分析评估超声在诊断前交叉韧带损伤(ACL 损伤)中的价值。检索 Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Pubmed 数据库,纳入截至 2017 年 4 月的相关文献。根据纳入和排除标准,选择评估超声诊断 ACL 损伤的研究。以 MRI、关节镜和临床随访作为参考标准。采用敏感度、特异度、似然比(LR)、后验概率、诊断比值比(DOR)和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(SROC)综合评估超声的诊断准确性。最终纳入 4 项研究,共 246 例患者。这 4 项研究的合并敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、后验概率和 DOR 分别为 90.0%(95%CI:77-96)、97%(95%CI:90-99)、31.08(95%CI:8.75-110.41)、0.11(95%CI:0.05-0.24)、89%(3%)和 288.81(95%CI:78.51-1062.48),SROC 曲线下面积为 0.98(95%CI:0.97-0.99)。本荟萃分析表明,超声在 ACL 损伤的诊断中具有重要作用。由于其具有较高的敏感度、特异度和诊断能力,超声应成为 ACL 损伤标准诊断方法的一部分。