Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Pennsylvania State University, Schuylkill Haven, Pennsylvania, USA.
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(2):65-74. doi: 10.1159/000486696. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
The aim of this paper was to perform a systematic review and, when feasible, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) which used benzodiazepines (BZD) as a monotherapy versus placebo, antidepressant drugs (AD), or both.
Keyword searches were conducted for identifying RCT comparing BZD and AD, and/or placebo in the treatment of depression, using electronic databases from their inception up to April 2017. We selected reports of RCT in which BZD were compared to AD and/or placebo in the treatment of adult patients with a primary diagnosis of depressive disorder or anxious depression. When feasible, data were subjected to meta-analysis.
A total of 38 studies met the criteria for inclusion and were then included in the systematic review. Only 1 study concerned a newer AD, fluvoxamine. For the meta-analysis, we submitted data on response rate from 22 RCT, considering BZD versus placebo (8 comparisons) and BZD versus tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) (20 comparisons). There was a lack of significant differences as to response rate between BZD and placebo, as well as between BZD and TCA. Analysis of individual studies disclosed that, in more than half of the studies comparing BZD to TCA and/or placebo, BZD were significantly more effective than placebo and as effective as TCA.
BZD are a therapeutic option in anxious depression and there are no indications that AD are preferable. There is a pressing need for RCT of adequate methodological quality and follow-up comparing BZD to second-generation AD and placebo in anxious depression.
本文旨在对使用苯二氮䓬类药物(BZD)作为单一疗法与安慰剂、抗抑郁药(AD)或两者进行随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价,并在可行的情况下进行荟萃分析。
通过电子数据库从成立到 2017 年 4 月对比较 BZD 和 AD 以及/或安慰剂治疗抑郁症的 RCT 进行了关键字搜索。我们选择了将 BZD 与 AD 和/或安慰剂比较用于治疗原发性诊断为抑郁症或焦虑性抑郁症的成年患者的 RCT 报告。在可行的情况下,对数据进行荟萃分析。
共有 38 项研究符合纳入标准,随后被纳入系统评价。只有 1 项研究涉及一种新型 AD,即氟伏沙明。对于荟萃分析,我们提交了来自 22 项 RCT 的反应率数据,考虑了 BZD 与安慰剂(8 项比较)和 BZD 与三环抗抑郁药(TCA)(20 项比较)。BZD 与安慰剂和 BZD 与 TCA 之间的反应率没有显著差异。对个别研究的分析表明,在将 BZD 与 TCA 和/或安慰剂进行比较的研究中,有一半以上的研究表明 BZD 比安慰剂更有效,与 TCA 一样有效。
BZD 是焦虑性抑郁症的一种治疗选择,没有迹象表明 AD 更可取。迫切需要 RCT 对足够的方法学质量和后续治疗进行比较,以在焦虑性抑郁症中比较 BZD 与第二代 AD 和安慰剂。