Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂治疗肝硬化患者门静脉高压症:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Yao Huijing, Zhang Chunqing

机构信息

Department of Digestive Diseases, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, No. 9677 Jingshi Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250014, China.

Department of Digestive Diseases, Tai'an Central Hospital, Tai'an, 271000, China.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;187(4):925-934. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1765-6. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed inconsistent results regarding the efficacy of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on portal pressure as indicated by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG).

METHODS

A meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to evaluate the influence of ARBs treatment on HVPG. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane's Library were searched for relevant RCTs. A fixed or a randomized effect model was used to pool the results according the heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs with 394 patients were included. ARBs treatment did not significantly change HVPG as compared with controls (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.73 to 0.47 mmHg, p = 0.26; I = 60%). These results were consistent in studies comparing ARBs with propranolol (WMD = -0.40, 95% CI -2.22 to 1.41 mmHg, p = 0.67; I = 68%), and those comparing ARBs with non-active controls including placebo or no treatment (WMD = -1.05, 95% CI -2.33 to 0.24 mmHg, p = 0.13; I = 44%). These results were also not affected by the individual ARBs used. Moreover, treatment of ARBs significantly reduced mean arterial blood pressure (WMD = -6.12, 95% CI -9.69 to -2.55 mmHg, p = 0.008; I = 53%), and the risk of symptomatic hypotension was increased (RR = 4.13, 95% CI 0.94 to 18.18, p = 0.06; I = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

ARBs did not reduce portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis; moreover, the risk of symptomatic hypotension may increase.

摘要

背景

随机对照试验(RCT)显示,血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)对肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)所指示的门静脉压力的疗效结果不一致。

方法

进行了一项RCT的荟萃分析,以评估ARB治疗对HVPG的影响。检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆以查找相关的RCT。根据异质性使用固定效应模型或随机效应模型汇总结果。进行亚组分析以探索异质性的来源。

结果

纳入了11项RCT,共394例患者。与对照组相比,ARB治疗并未显著改变HVPG(加权平均差[WMD] = -0.63,95%置信区间[CI] -1.73至0.47 mmHg,p = 0.26;I² = 60%)。在比较ARB与普萘洛尔的研究中(WMD = -0.40,95% CI -2.22至1.41 mmHg,p = 0.67;I² = 68%)以及比较ARB与包括安慰剂或未治疗在内的非活性对照的研究中(WMD = -1.05,95% CI -2.33至0.24 mmHg,p = 0.13;I² = 44%),这些结果是一致 的。这些结果也不受所使用的个别ARB的影响。此外,ARB治疗显著降低了平均动脉血压(WMD = -6.12,95% CI -9.69至-2.55 mmHg,p = 0.008;I² = 53%),并且症状性低血压的风险增加(RR = 4.13,95% CI 0.94至18.18,p = 0.06;I² = 0%)。

结论

ARB并未降低肝硬化患者的门静脉压力;此外,症状性低血压的风险可能会增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验