Yao Huijing, Zhang Chunqing
Department of Digestive Diseases, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, No. 9677 Jingshi Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250014, China.
Department of Digestive Diseases, Tai'an Central Hospital, Tai'an, 271000, China.
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;187(4):925-934. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1765-6. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed inconsistent results regarding the efficacy of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on portal pressure as indicated by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG).
A meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to evaluate the influence of ARBs treatment on HVPG. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane's Library were searched for relevant RCTs. A fixed or a randomized effect model was used to pool the results according the heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity.
Eleven RCTs with 394 patients were included. ARBs treatment did not significantly change HVPG as compared with controls (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.73 to 0.47 mmHg, p = 0.26; I = 60%). These results were consistent in studies comparing ARBs with propranolol (WMD = -0.40, 95% CI -2.22 to 1.41 mmHg, p = 0.67; I = 68%), and those comparing ARBs with non-active controls including placebo or no treatment (WMD = -1.05, 95% CI -2.33 to 0.24 mmHg, p = 0.13; I = 44%). These results were also not affected by the individual ARBs used. Moreover, treatment of ARBs significantly reduced mean arterial blood pressure (WMD = -6.12, 95% CI -9.69 to -2.55 mmHg, p = 0.008; I = 53%), and the risk of symptomatic hypotension was increased (RR = 4.13, 95% CI 0.94 to 18.18, p = 0.06; I = 0%).
ARBs did not reduce portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis; moreover, the risk of symptomatic hypotension may increase.
随机对照试验(RCT)显示,血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)对肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)所指示的门静脉压力的疗效结果不一致。
进行了一项RCT的荟萃分析,以评估ARB治疗对HVPG的影响。检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆以查找相关的RCT。根据异质性使用固定效应模型或随机效应模型汇总结果。进行亚组分析以探索异质性的来源。
纳入了11项RCT,共394例患者。与对照组相比,ARB治疗并未显著改变HVPG(加权平均差[WMD] = -0.63,95%置信区间[CI] -1.73至0.47 mmHg,p = 0.26;I² = 60%)。在比较ARB与普萘洛尔的研究中(WMD = -0.40,95% CI -2.22至1.41 mmHg,p = 0.67;I² = 68%)以及比较ARB与包括安慰剂或未治疗在内的非活性对照的研究中(WMD = -1.05,95% CI -2.33至0.24 mmHg,p = 0.13;I² = 44%),这些结果是一致 的。这些结果也不受所使用的个别ARB的影响。此外,ARB治疗显著降低了平均动脉血压(WMD = -6.12,95% CI -9.69至-2.55 mmHg,p = 0.008;I² = 53%),并且症状性低血压的风险增加(RR = 4.13,95% CI 0.94至18.18,p = 0.06;I² = 0%)。
ARB并未降低肝硬化患者的门静脉压力;此外,症状性低血压的风险可能会增加。