College of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning, PR China.
Basic Medical College, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning, PR China.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 May-Jun;76:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
This study aimed to examine the role of falls efficacy in the relationship between the locomotive function and quality of life.
From March to May in 2016, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among 830 community residents aged ≥60 years from Jinzhou,China.GLFS-25 (25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale), FES-I(International edition of Falls Efficacy Scale),and SF-12 (12-item Short Form Health Survey) were used to estimate locomotive function, falls efficacy and quality of life, respectively. The higher score of GLFS-25, the worse the locomotive function.
Median age was 68.69 years (ranges 60-88). Locomotive function, falls efficacy and quality of life all presented a linear relationship within each other, locomotive function score was negatively correlated with falls efficacy score (-0.461, P < 0.01). locomotive function score was negatively correlated with quality of life score (-0.523, P < 0.01).Falls efficacy score was positively correlated with quality of life score (0.415, P < 0.01).Falls efficacy exerted both a mediating and moderating role between locomotive function and quality of life, and the mediation effect accounted for 45.5% of the total effect.
Poorer locomotive function was associated with poorer quality of life, and greater falls efficacy was associated with better quality of life. In addition, falls efficacy was demonstrated to be both a mediator and moderator variable in the linkage between locomotive function and quality of life. Aged care professional practitioners and our policy makers should strengthen the awareness of the psychological role of the elderly falls efficacy.
本研究旨在探讨跌倒效能在运动功能与生活质量之间的关系中的作用。
2016 年 3 月至 5 月,我们对中国锦州的 830 名≥60 岁的社区居民进行了横断面调查。使用 GLFS-25(25 项老年运动功能量表)、FES-I(跌倒效能量表国际版)和 SF-12(12 项简明健康调查量表)分别评估运动功能、跌倒效能和生活质量。GLFS-25 的评分越高,运动功能越差。
中位年龄为 68.69 岁(范围 60-88 岁)。运动功能、跌倒效能和生活质量彼此之间呈线性关系,运动功能评分与跌倒效能评分呈负相关(-0.461,P<0.01)。运动功能评分与生活质量评分呈负相关(-0.523,P<0.01)。跌倒效能评分与生活质量评分呈正相关(0.415,P<0.01)。跌倒效能在运动功能和生活质量之间发挥了中介和调节作用,中介效应占总效应的 45.5%。
较差的运动功能与较差的生活质量相关,而较高的跌倒效能与较好的生活质量相关。此外,跌倒效能被证明是运动功能和生活质量之间联系的中介和调节变量。老年护理专业人员和我们的政策制定者应加强对老年人跌倒效能的心理作用的认识。