The University of Texas at San Antonio, United States.
The University of Texas at San Antonio, United States.
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Aug;79:116-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
Functional communication training (FCT) is considered an evidence-based practice for treating problem behavior in individuals with developmental disabilities (e.g. autism, intellectual disabilities, down syndrome, etc.). However, there is little known on how to sustain behavioral change following FCT interventions. This systematic and quality review synthesizes the current literature base evaluating the maintenance and generalization of behavioral effects following FCT.
A systematic review identified 37 studies that met the pre-set inclusion criteria. Those studies were summarized in terms of: (a) generalization dimension, (b) generalization assessment design, (c) maintenance assessment design, (d) maintenance and generalization teaching strategy, and (e) latency to maintenance probes. All studies employed single-case research designs and were evaluated using the What Works Clearinghouse pilot single-case research standards (Kratochwill et al., 2013) as adapted by Maggin, Briesch, and Chafouleas (2013). Maintenance and generalization data were evaluated using a researcher-developed rubric based on the WWC standards.
Results indicate that 30 studies met standards or met standards with reservations while only six studies also met all of the maintenance and generalization standards. Of the six studies, five did not implement any additional strategies beyond the contacting natural contingencies that is inherent in the FCT intervention. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
功能性沟通训练(FCT)被认为是治疗发育障碍个体(如自闭症、智力障碍、唐氏综合征等)问题行为的循证实践。然而,对于 FCT 干预后如何维持行为改变知之甚少。本系统评价和质量综述综合了当前评估 FCT 后行为效果维持和泛化的文献基础。
系统评价确定了符合预设纳入标准的 37 项研究。这些研究从以下几个方面进行了总结:(a)泛化维度,(b)泛化评估设计,(c)维持评估设计,(d)维持和泛化教学策略,以及(e)维持探针的潜伏期。所有研究均采用单一案例研究设计,并使用由 Kratochwill 等人(2013 年)改编的 What Works Clearinghouse 试点单一案例研究标准(Kratochwill 等人,2013 年)以及 Maggin、Briesch 和 Chafouleas(2013 年)进行评估。维持和泛化数据使用基于 WWC 标准的研究者开发的评分表进行评估。
结果表明,30 项研究符合标准或有保留地符合标准,而只有 6 项研究也符合维持和泛化标准。在这 6 项研究中,除了 FCT 干预中固有的接触自然强化物的策略之外,没有一项研究实施了任何额外的策略。讨论了对未来研究和实践的影响。