Suppr超能文献

使用多个条件输入的四脉冲经颅磁刺激。正常运动诱发电位反应。

Four-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation using multiple conditioning inputs. Normative MEP responses.

作者信息

Calancie Blair, Wang Dongliang, Young Eufrosina, Alexeeva Natalia

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Upstate Medical University, 750 E. Adams St., Syracuse, NY, 13104, USA.

Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Upstate Medical University, 750 E. Adams St., Syracuse, NY, 13104, USA.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2018 Apr;236(4):1205-1218. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5212-8. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

Abstract

A four-pulse pattern of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was compared to traditional dual-pulse TMS for its ability to modulate motor cortical excitability. This novel pattern consisted of a three-pulse train of subthreshold conditioning pulses followed by a suprathreshold test pulse (i.e., SC-T). The intervals between these superconditioning (SC) pulses (1, 3, or 6 ms) and the follow-on test pulse (1, 3, 10, or 25 ms) were varied, and the resultant MEPs were compared to those elicited by: (1) single-pulse TMS; and (2) dual-pulse conditioning-test (C-T) TMS with either short (3 ms) or long (10 ms) intervals to elicit short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) or intracortical facilitation (ICF), respectively. Testing included abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and tibialis anterior (TA) in 15 neurologically normal adults. For superconditioning inputs, 10 ms test intervals caused especially strong facilitation of the test MEP, while 1 ms test intervals were particularly effective at causing inhibition of the test response. For both muscles and across all subjects, the most effective of the 12 SC-T inputs tested for causing either facilitation or inhibition was-with rare exception-superior to the dual-pulse TMS input for causing facilitation (i.e., ICF) or inhibition (i.e., SICI), while the overall magnitude of effect was more pronounced in APB compared to TA. Nevertheless, after normalization, the impact of a superconditioning input train on the test MEP was similar in APB and TA muscles, suggesting similar mechanisms of action. Limited findings from a single subject with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are included to further illustrate the potential advantages of using a train of conditioning pulses preceding a TMS test pulse to selectively investigate abnormal motor cortical excitatory and inhibitory circuitry.

摘要

将四脉冲模式的经颅磁刺激(TMS)与传统双脉冲TMS调节运动皮质兴奋性的能力进行了比较。这种新模式由一串三个阈下条件刺激脉冲组成,随后是一个阈上测试脉冲(即SC-T)。这些超条件刺激(SC)脉冲之间的间隔(1、3或6毫秒)以及后续测试脉冲的间隔(1、3、10或25毫秒)有所变化,并将由此产生的运动诱发电位(MEP)与以下情况引发的MEP进行比较:(1)单脉冲TMS;(2)双脉冲条件-测试(C-T)TMS,其间隔分别为短间隔(3毫秒)或长间隔(10毫秒),以分别引发短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)或皮质内易化(ICF)。测试对象包括15名神经功能正常的成年人的拇短展肌(APB)和胫前肌(TA)。对于超条件刺激输入,10毫秒的测试间隔对测试MEP的易化作用尤为强烈,而1毫秒的测试间隔在抑制测试反应方面特别有效。对于这两块肌肉以及所有受试者而言,在测试的12种SC-T输入中,用于产生易化或抑制作用最有效的——极少数情况除外——优于用于产生易化(即ICF)或抑制(即SICI)的双脉冲TMS输入,而与TA相比,APB中效应的总体幅度更为明显。然而,归一化后,超条件刺激输入序列对测试MEP的影响在APB和TA肌肉中相似,表明作用机制相似。还纳入了一名肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者的有限研究结果,以进一步说明在TMS测试脉冲之前使用一串条件刺激脉冲来选择性研究异常运动皮质兴奋性和抑制性回路的潜在优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验