Wanner A
Am J Med. 1986 Nov 14;81(5A):23-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90458-4.
Airway mucociliary dysfunction leading to a depression of mucus transport has been demonstrated in patients with acute and chronic bronchitis, cystic fibrosis, and bronchial asthma; use of bronchodilators that might further impair mucociliary function, therefore, generally has been discouraged. Atropine and ipratropium bromide are cholinergic antagonists that are effective bronchodilators in various clinical settings. Atropine has been shown to block the production of respiratory secretions in response to cholinergic stimulation, but to have no effect on baseline secretions. Atropine has also been clearly demonstrated to depress ciliary beat frequency and to slow airway mucociliary clearance, whereas the short-term and long-term administration of ipratropium bromide at higher than clinically recommended doses seems to lack these effects. No satisfactory explanation has thus far been offered for this difference between the two cholinergic antagonists. Nevertheless, with respect to airway mucociliary function, ipratropium bromide appears to be preferable to atropine in the treatment of obstructive airways disease.
在患有急慢性支气管炎、囊性纤维化和支气管哮喘的患者中,已证实气道黏液纤毛功能障碍会导致黏液运输能力下降;因此,通常不鼓励使用可能进一步损害黏液纤毛功能的支气管扩张剂。阿托品和异丙托溴铵是胆碱能拮抗剂,在各种临床环境中都是有效的支气管扩张剂。已表明阿托品可阻止胆碱能刺激引起的呼吸道分泌物产生,但对基线分泌物无影响。还清楚地证明阿托品会降低纤毛摆动频率并减慢气道黏液纤毛清除率,而高于临床推荐剂量的异丙托溴铵短期和长期给药似乎没有这些作用。迄今为止,对于这两种胆碱能拮抗剂之间的这种差异尚无令人满意的解释。然而,就气道黏液纤毛功能而言,在阻塞性气道疾病的治疗中,异丙托溴铵似乎比阿托品更可取。