• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and preliminary validation of the Parenting around SNAcking Questionnaire (P-SNAQ).养育与进食行为问卷(P-SNAQ)的编制及初步验证。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:323-332. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.035. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
2
Parenting around child snacking: development of a theoretically-guided, empirically informed conceptual model.围绕儿童零食的育儿方式:构建一个理论导向、实证支撑的概念模型
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Sep 17;12:109. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0268-3.
3
The Comprehensive Snack Parenting Questionnaire (CSPQ): Development and Test-Retest Reliability.《综合零食养育问卷》(CSPQ):编制与重测信度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 26;15(5):862. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050862.
4
Development of a Comprehensive Assessment of Food Parenting Practices: The Home Self-Administered Tool for Environmental Assessment of Activity and Diet Family Food Practices Survey.食品养育行为综合评估的开发:家庭自我管理的活动与饮食环境评估工具及家庭食品行为调查
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Feb;117(2):214-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
5
Development and preliminary validation of the Adolescent Food Parenting Questionnaire: Parent and adolescent version.青少年食物养育问卷的编制及初步验证:家长版和青少年版。
Appetite. 2021 Dec 1;167:105618. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105618. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
6
The feeding siblings questionnaire (FSQ): Development of a self-report tool for parents with children aged 2-5 years.喂养兄弟姐妹问卷 (FSQ):为 2-5 岁儿童的父母开发的自我报告工具。
Appetite. 2024 Jul 1;198:107363. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107363. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
Associations between general parenting, restrictive snacking rules, and adolescent's snack intake. The roles of fathers and mothers and interparental congruence.父母教养方式、限制零食规则与青少年零食摄入量的关系。父亲和母亲的作用以及父母间的一致性。
Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.220. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
8
Associations of parental feeding styles with child snacking behaviour and weight in the context of general parenting.在一般养育背景下,父母喂养方式与儿童吃零食行为及体重的关联。
Public Health Nutr. 2014 May;17(5):960-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000712. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
Influences of Parental Snacking-Related Attitudes, Behaviours and Nutritional Knowledge on Young Children's Healthy and Unhealthy Snacking: The ToyBox Study.父母关于零食的态度、行为和营养知识对幼儿健康和不健康零食的影响:ToyBox 研究。
Nutrients. 2020 Feb 7;12(2):432. doi: 10.3390/nu12020432.
10
Development of a theory-based questionnaire to assess structure and control in parent feeding (SCPF).开发一种基于理论的问卷,以评估家长喂养中的结构与控制(SCPF)。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jan 26;14(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0466-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Longitudinal Impact of Within- and Between-Day Fluctuations in Food Parenting Practices on Child Dietary Intake: Protocol for a Longitudinal Cohort Study Within a Sample of Preschooler-Parent Dyads.探究食物养育方式的日内和日间波动对儿童饮食摄入量的纵向影响:一项针对学龄前儿童-家长二元组样本的纵向队列研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 16;14:e73276. doi: 10.2196/73276.
2
Association between snack parenting style and dental caries status of children aged 7-8 years: a sequential mixed method approach.零食养育方式与7-8岁儿童龋齿状况之间的关联:一种序贯混合方法研究
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Feb 13. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01003-y.
3
A feasible and reliable self-administered parental assessment of children's lifestyle (SAPLACL): an ancillary study based on the VIF program.一种可行且可靠的儿童生活方式自评量表(SAPLACL):基于 VIF 计划的辅助研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 May 15;15(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06069-1.
4
Associations of mothers' and fathers' structure-related food parenting practices and child food approach eating behaviors during the COVID pandemic.母亲和父亲与结构相关的食物养育实践与儿童在 COVID 大流行期间的食物接近性进食行为的关联。
Physiol Behav. 2022 Aug 1;252:113837. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113837. Epub 2022 May 2.
5
Reducing Young Schoolchildren's Intake of Sugar-Rich Food and Drinks: Study Protocol and Intervention Design for "Are You Too Sweet?" A Multicomponent 3.5-Month Cluster Randomised Family-Based Intervention Study.减少小学生含糖食物和饮料摄入量:“你太甜了吗?”一项为期 3.5 个月的多成分、基于家庭的群组随机对照干预研究的研究方案和干预设计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 21;17(24):9580. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249580.
6
Parental stress, food parenting practices and child snack intake during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的父母压力、食物养育方式与儿童零食摄入量
Appetite. 2021 Jun 1;161:105119. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105119. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
7
Positive parenting approaches and their association with child eating and weight: A narrative review from infancy to adolescence.积极的育儿方法及其与儿童饮食和体重的关系:从婴儿期到青春期的叙述性综述。
Pediatr Obes. 2020 Oct;15(10):e12722. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12722. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
Influences of Parental Snacking-Related Attitudes, Behaviours and Nutritional Knowledge on Young Children's Healthy and Unhealthy Snacking: The ToyBox Study.父母关于零食的态度、行为和营养知识对幼儿健康和不健康零食的影响:ToyBox 研究。
Nutrients. 2020 Feb 7;12(2):432. doi: 10.3390/nu12020432.
9
The effect of mild sleep deprivation on diet and eating behaviour in children: protocol for the Daily Rest, Eating, and Activity Monitoring (DREAM) randomized cross-over trial.轻度睡眠剥夺对儿童饮食和进食行为的影响:每日休息、饮食和活动监测(DREAM)随机交叉试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):1347. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7628-x.
10
Conceptualizing Family Influences on Children's Energy Balance-Related Behaviors: Levels of Interacting Family Environmental Subsystems (The LIFES Framework).概念化家庭对儿童能量平衡相关行为的影响:相互作用的家庭环境子系统的层次(LIFES 框架)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 1;15(12):2714. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122714.

本文引用的文献

1
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
37 year snacking trends for US children 1977-2014.1977 - 2014年美国儿童37年的零食消费趋势。
Pediatr Obes. 2018 Apr;13(4):247-255. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12220. Epub 2017 May 15.
3
Parenting styles and body mass index: a systematic review of prospective studies among children.育儿方式与体重指数:对儿童前瞻性研究的系统评价
Obes Rev. 2017 Mar;18(3):281-292. doi: 10.1111/obr.12497. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
4
Snacking Among US Children: Patterns Differ by Time of Day.美国儿童的零食习惯:模式因一天中的时间而异。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016 Jun;48(6):369-375.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
5
Associations between meal and snack frequency and overweight and abdominal obesity in US children and adolescents from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2012.2003 - 2012年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)中儿童和青少年的进餐及吃零食频率与超重和腹部肥胖之间的关联。
Br J Nutr. 2016 May 28;115(10):1819-29. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516000854. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: a content map to guide future research.食物养育行为的基本构成要素:一份指导未来研究的内容图谱。
Nutr Rev. 2016 Feb;74(2):98-117. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv061. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
7
Parenting Styles, Feeding Styles, Feeding Practices, and Weight Status in 4-12 Year-Old Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature.4至12岁儿童的养育方式、喂养方式、喂养行为及体重状况:文献系统综述
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 14;6:1849. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01849. eCollection 2015.
8
"What do you think of when I say the word 'snack'?" Towards a cohesive definition among low-income caregivers of preschool-age children.当我说“零食”这个词时,你会想到什么?——关于低收入学龄前儿童照顾者的一个连贯定义。
Appetite. 2016 Mar 1;98:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
9
Household food insecurity as a determinant of overweight and obesity among low-income Hispanic subgroups: Data from the 2011-2012 California Health Interview Survey.家庭粮食不安全作为低收入西班牙裔亚群体超重和肥胖的一个决定因素:来自2011 - 2012年加利福尼亚健康访谈调查的数据。
Appetite. 2016 Feb 1;97:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
10
Parenting around child snacking: development of a theoretically-guided, empirically informed conceptual model.围绕儿童零食的育儿方式:构建一个理论导向、实证支撑的概念模型
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Sep 17;12:109. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0268-3.

养育与进食行为问卷(P-SNAQ)的编制及初步验证。

Development and preliminary validation of the Parenting around SNAcking Questionnaire (P-SNAQ).

机构信息

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Nutrition, 665 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02445, USA; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 665 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02445, USA.

University of South Carolina, Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

出版信息

Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:323-332. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.035. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.035
PMID:29475073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5878748/
Abstract

Snacking makes significant contributions to children's dietary intake but is poorly understood from a parenting perspective. This research was designed to develop and evaluate the psychometrics of a theoretically grounded, empirically-informed measure of snack parenting. The Parenting around SNAcking Questionnaire (P-SNAQ) was developed using a conceptual model derived from current theory and mixed-methods research to include 20 hypothesized snack parenting practices along 4 parenting dimensions (autonomy support, structure, coercive control and permissiveness). Expert panel evaluation and cognitive interviews were used to refine items and construct definitions. The initial instrument of 105 items was administered to an ethnically diverse, low-income sample of 305 parents (92% mothers) of children aged 1-6 y participating in three existing cohort studies. The sample was randomly split into two equal samples. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted with the first sample to identify snack parenting practices within each parenting dimension, followed by confirmatory factor analysis with the second sample to test the hypothesized factor structure. Internal consistency of sub-scales and associations with existing measures of food parenting practices and styles and child weight status were evaluated. The final P-SNAQ scale included 51 items reflecting 14 snack parenting practices across four parenting dimensions. The factor structure of the P-SNAQ was consistent with prior theoretical frameworks. Internal consistency coefficients were good to very good for 12 out of 14 scales and subscale scores were moderately correlated with previously validated measures. In conclusion, initial evidence suggests that P-SNAQ is a psychometrically sound measure for evaluating a wide range of snack parenting practices in young children.

摘要

吃零食对儿童的饮食摄入有重要贡献,但从父母的角度来看,这方面的了解甚少。本研究旨在开发和评估一种基于理论、具有实证依据的零食养育度量衡的心理测量学特性。基于当前理论和混合方法研究得出的概念模型,开发了养育围绕零食问卷(P-SNAQ),包括 4 个养育维度(自主支持、结构、强制性控制和放任)下的 20 个假设性零食养育实践。专家小组评估和认知访谈用于改进项目和构建定义。最初的 105 个项目的工具被用于参与三项现有队列研究的、来自不同种族、收入较低的 305 名 1-6 岁儿童的父母(92%为母亲)。样本被随机分为两个相等的样本。第一个样本进行探索性因子分析,以确定每个养育维度中的零食养育实践,然后第二个样本进行验证性因子分析,以检验假设的因子结构。对亚量表的内部一致性以及与现有食物养育实践和风格以及儿童体重状况的衡量标准的关联进行了评估。最终的 P-SNAQ 量表包括 51 个项目,反映了四个养育维度中的 14 种零食养育实践。P-SNAQ 的因子结构与先前的理论框架一致。14 个量表中的 12 个量表的内部一致性系数良好至非常好,量表分数与先前验证过的衡量标准中度相关。总之,初步证据表明,P-SNAQ 是一种用于评估幼儿广泛的零食养育实践的心理测量学上合理的衡量标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5d/5878748/58082e43adb4/nihms948871f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5d/5878748/0500c5f04a07/nihms948871f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5d/5878748/fd7819833ab3/nihms948871f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5d/5878748/58082e43adb4/nihms948871f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5d/5878748/0500c5f04a07/nihms948871f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5d/5878748/fd7819833ab3/nihms948871f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5d/5878748/58082e43adb4/nihms948871f3.jpg