National Unit of Orthopaedic Oncology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Division of Orthopaedics, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Bone. 2018 May;110:215-220. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
Physician recommendation for prophylactic surgical fixation of a femur with metastatic bone disease (MBD) is usually based on Mirels' criteria and clinical experience, both of which suffer from poor specificity. This may result in a significant number of these health compromised patients undergoing unnecessary surgery. CT-based finite element analyses (CTFEA) have been shown to accurately predict strength in femurs with metastatic tumors in an ex-vivo study. In order to assess the utility of CTFEA as a clinical tool to determine the need for fixation of patients with MBD of the femur, an ad hoc CTFEA was performed on a retrospective cohort of fifty patients. Patients with CT scans appropriate for CTFEA analysis were analyzed. Group 1 was composed of 5 MBD patients who presented with a pathologic femoral fracture and had a scan of their femurs just prior to fracture. Group 2 was composed of 45 MBD patients who were scheduled for a prophylactic surgery because of an impending femoral fracture. CTFEA models were constructed for both femurs for all patients, loaded with a hip contact force representing stance position loading accounting for the patient's weight and femur anatomy. CTFEA analysis of Group 1 patients revealed that they all had higher tumor associated strains compared to typical non-diseased femur bone strains at the same region (>45%). Based on analysis of the 5 patients in Group 1, the ratio between the absolute maximum principal strain in the vicinity of the tumor and the typical median strain in the region of the tumor of healthy bones (typical strain fold ratio) was found to be the 1.48. This was considered to be the predictive threshold for a pathological femoral fracture. Based on this typical strain fold ratio, twenty patients (44.4%) in Group 2 were at low risk of fracture and twenty-five patients (55.5%) high risk of fracture. Eleven patients in Group 2 choose not to have surgery and none fractured in the 5month follow-up period. CTFEA predicted that seven of these patients were below the pathological fracture threshold and four above, for a specificity of 63% Based on CTFEA, 39% of the patients with femoral MBD who were referred and underwent prophylactic stabilization may not have needed surgery. These results indicate that a prospective randomized clinical trial evaluating CTFEA as a criterion for determining the need for surgical stabilization in patients with MBD of the femur may be warranted.
医生建议对患有转移性骨病 (MBD) 的股骨进行预防性手术固定,这通常基于 Mirels 标准和临床经验,但两者特异性都较差。这可能导致许多健康状况不佳的患者接受不必要的手术。基于 CT 的有限元分析 (CTFEA) 在一项离体研究中已被证明可以准确预测患有转移性肿瘤的股骨的强度。为了评估 CTFEA 作为一种临床工具来确定需要固定患有股骨 MBD 的患者的效用,对五十名患者的回顾性队列进行了专门的 CTFEA 分析。对适合 CTFEA 分析的 CT 扫描患者进行了分析。第 1 组由 5 名患有 MBD 的患者组成,他们出现病理性股骨骨折,并且在骨折前对其股骨进行了扫描。第 2 组由 45 名因即将发生股骨骨折而计划进行预防性手术的 MBD 患者组成。对所有患者的双侧股骨均构建了 CTFEA 模型,这些模型加载了代表站立位置加载的髋关节接触力,考虑了患者的体重和股骨解剖结构。对第 1 组患者的 CTFEA 分析显示,与同一区域的典型非病变股骨骨应变相比,他们的所有肿瘤相关应变均较高 (>45%)。基于对第 1 组的 5 名患者的分析,发现肿瘤附近的绝对最大主应变与健康骨肿瘤区域的典型中值应变之间的比值(典型应变倍数比)为 1.48。这被认为是病理性股骨骨折的预测阈值。基于此典型应变倍数比,第 2 组中有 20 名患者(44.4%)骨折风险低,25 名患者(55.5%)骨折风险高。第 2 组中有 11 名患者选择不进行手术,在 5 个月的随访期间没有发生骨折。CTFEA 预测其中 7 名患者低于病理性骨折阈值,4 名患者高于该阈值,特异性为 63%。基于 CTFEA,50 名被转诊并接受预防性稳定治疗的股骨 MBD 患者中有 39%可能不需要手术。这些结果表明,可能需要进行前瞻性随机临床试验,以评估 CTFEA 作为确定需要对患有股骨 MBD 的患者进行手术稳定的标准。