Suppr超能文献

患者参与急性住院内科病房的住院查房:一项描述性研究。

Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research- MonashHealth Partnership, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):15-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007292. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Meaningful partnering with patients is advocated to enhance care delivery. Little is known about how this is operationalised at the point of care during hospital ward rounds, where decision-making concerning patient care frequently occurs.

OBJECTIVE

Describe participation of patients, with differing preferences for participation, during ward rounds in acute medical inpatient services.

METHODS

Naturalistic, multimethod design. Data were collected using surveys and observations of ward rounds at two hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Using convenience sampling, a stratified sample of acute general medical patients were recruited. Prior to observation and interview, patient responses to the Control Preference Scale were used to stratify them into three groups representing diverse participation preferences: active control where the patient makes decisions; shared control where the patient prefers to make decisions jointly with clinicians; and passive control where the patient prefers clinicians make decisions.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients observed over 133 ward rounds, 30.8% (n=16) reported an active control preference for participation in decision-making during ward rounds, 25% (n=13) expressed shared control preference and 44.2% (n=23) expressed low control preference. Patients' participation was observed in 75% (n=85) of ward rounds, but few rounds (18%, n=20) involved patient contribution to decisions about their care. Clinicians prompted patient participation in 54% of rounds; and in 15% patients initiated their own participation. Thematic analysis of qualitative observation and patient interview data revealed two themes, and , that contributed to patient participation or non-participation in ward rounds.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in ward rounds was similar for patients irrespective of control preference. This study demonstrates the need to better understand clinician roles in supporting strategies that promote patient participation in day-to-day hospital care.

摘要

背景

提倡与患者建立有意义的伙伴关系,以增强护理服务。在医院病房查房期间,经常做出有关患者护理的决策,但是对于如何在这一点上实施以患者为中心的护理,我们知之甚少。

目的

描述具有不同参与意愿的患者在急性内科住院服务病房查房期间的参与情况。

方法

自然主义、多方法设计。在澳大利亚墨尔本的两家医院,通过调查和病房查房观察收集数据。采用便利抽样法,招募了急性普通内科患者的分层样本。在观察和访谈之前,使用控制偏好量表对患者进行调查,将他们分为三组,分别代表不同的参与偏好:积极控制,即患者做出决策;共同控制,即患者希望与临床医生共同做出决策;被动控制,即患者希望临床医生做出决策。

结果

在观察的 133 次查房中,有 30.8%(n=16)的患者报告在查房期间积极控制参与决策,25%(n=13)的患者表达了共同控制偏好,44.2%(n=23)的患者表达了低控制偏好。在 75%(n=85)的查房中观察到患者的参与,但只有少数查房(18%,n=20)涉及患者对自身护理决策的贡献。临床医生在 54%的查房中提示患者参与;在 15%的查房中,患者主动参与。对定性观察和患者访谈数据的主题分析揭示了两个主题,即 和 ,这两个主题促成了患者在查房中的参与或不参与。

结论

不论控制偏好如何,患者在查房中的参与情况相似。本研究表明,需要更好地理解临床医生在支持促进患者参与日常医院护理的策略方面的作用。

相似文献

7
Exploring interdisciplinary teamwork to support effective ward rounds.探索跨学科团队合作以支持有效的病房查房。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2020 Jul 14;33(4-5):373-387. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2019-0178.
8
The ward round--patient experiences and barriers to participation.查房——患者体验与参与障碍
Scand J Caring Sci. 2014 Jun;28(2):297-304. doi: 10.1111/scs.12059. Epub 2013 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

8
Teaming in Graduate Medical Education: Ward Rounds and Beyond.研究生医学教育中的团队合作:查房及其他方面。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Jan 31;11:23821205231225588. doi: 10.1177/23821205231225588. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

4
Patients' perceptions of participation in nursing care on medical wards.患者对参与内科病房护理的看法。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2016 Jun;30(2):260-70. doi: 10.1111/scs.12237. Epub 2015 Jun 2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验