• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

角膜交联术(CXL)后中央基质分界线深度与K值变化之间的相关性。

Correlation between central stromal demarcation line depth and changes in K values after corneal cross-linking (CXL).

作者信息

Pircher Niklas, Lammer Jan, Holzer Stephan, Gschließer Andreas, Donner Ruth, Pieh Stefan, Schmidinger Gerald

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;256(4):759-764. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3922-z. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-018-3922-z
PMID:29476249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5856899/
Abstract

PURPOSE

A stromal demarcation line (DL) after corneal cross-linking (CXL) has lately been suggested as a surrogate parameter for the success of CXL. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between depth of the central DL 1 month and the change in K values 12 months after CXL.

METHODS

Treatment-naive subjects with keratoconus were treated using an accelerated CXL protocol [A-CXL(9*10)]. Depth of the DL/relative depth of the DL (DL%) was measured using Visante OCT imaging 1 month postoperatively (OP). K/K (preOP) and change in K/K (preOP - 12 months postOP) were assessed using corneal tomography (Pentacam HR, Oculus GmBH).

RESULTS

Forty eyes were treated following the A-CXL(9*10). The mean DL depth was 200 ± 99 μm (range 71 to 479)/mean DL% = 42.70 ± 20.00% (range 17-90). There was no statistically significant correlation between stromal depth of the DL and change in K or K, respectively (Spearman rho DL/∆K - 0.14 and DL/∆K - 0.14). Between DL% and the changes in maximum K values or K, no statistically significant correlation was found as well (Spearman rho DL%/∆K - 0.10 and DL%/∆K - 0.19). Mean change in K after 12 months was - 0.68 ± 2.26 diopters (D) (median - 0.35 D) and - 0.82 ± 1.6 D (median - 0.65 D) for K (p = 0.07; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant correlation was found between the stromal central depth of the DL and any outcome parameter for CXL after 12 months. Therefore, the interpretation of the DL as a predictive parameter for the effect of the procedure may not apply.

摘要

目的

角膜交联术(CXL)后出现的基质分界线(DL)最近被认为是CXL成功的替代参数。本研究的目的是调查CXL术后1个月中央DL深度与术后12个月K值变化之间的相关性。

方法

对初治圆锥角膜患者采用加速CXL方案[A-CXL(9*10)]进行治疗。术后1个月(OP)使用Visante OCT成像测量DL深度/DL相对深度(DL%)。使用角膜地形图仪(Pentacam HR,德国奥culus公司)评估术前K值/K(preOP)以及K值/K的变化(preOP - 术后12个月)。

结果

40只眼接受了A-CXL(9*10)治疗。平均DL深度为200±99μm(范围71至479μm)/平均DL% = 42.70±20.00%(范围17 - 90%)。DL的基质深度与K值或K值变化之间分别无统计学显著相关性(斯皮尔曼相关系数DL/∆K - 0.14以及DL/∆K - 0.14)。在DL%与最大K值或K值变化之间也未发现统计学显著相关性(斯皮尔曼相关系数DL%/∆K - 0.10以及DL%/∆K - 0.19)。术后12个月K值的平均变化对于K值而言为-0.68±2.26屈光度(D)(中位数-0.35 D),对于K值为-0.82±1.6 D(中位数-0.65 D)(p = 0.07;p = 0.02)。

结论

术后12个月,未发现DL的基质中央深度与CXL的任何结果参数之间存在统计学显著相关性。因此,将DL解释为该手术效果的预测参数可能并不适用。

相似文献

1
Correlation between central stromal demarcation line depth and changes in K values after corneal cross-linking (CXL).角膜交联术(CXL)后中央基质分界线深度与K值变化之间的相关性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;256(4):759-764. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3922-z. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
2
Correlation of Demarcation Line Depth With Medium-Term Efficacy of Different Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Protocols in Keratoconus.圆锥角膜中分界线深度与不同角膜胶原交联方案中期疗效的相关性
Cornea. 2018 Dec;37(12):1511-1516. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001733.
3
Conventional and Iontophoresis Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Efficacy and Assessment by Optical Coherence Tomography and Confocal Microscopy.圆锥角膜的传统及离子导入角膜交联术:光学相干断层扫描和共聚焦显微镜的疗效及评估
Cornea. 2017 Feb;36(2):153-162. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001062.
4
Corneal collagen cross-linking demarcation line depth assessed by Visante OCT After CXL for keratoconus and corneal ectasia.经交联治疗圆锥角膜和角膜扩张后的 Visante OCT 评估角膜胶原交联分界线深度。
J Refract Surg. 2012 Jul;28(7):475-81. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120615-03.
5
Visibility and Depth of the Stromal Demarcation Line After Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography: Comparison Between Isoosmolar and Hypoosmolar Riboflavin.使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描技术观察角膜胶原交联术后基质分界线的可视性和深度:等渗与低渗核黄素的比较
Cornea. 2018 May;37(5):567-573. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001493.
6
Corneal stromal demarcation line after 4 protocols of corneal crosslinking in keratoconus determined with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.四种角膜交联方案治疗圆锥角膜后角膜基质分界线的眼前节光学相干断层扫描评估。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 May;44(5):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.02.017.
7
Corneal cross-linking in keratoconus using the standard and rapid treatment protocol: differences in demarcation line and 12-month outcomes.使用标准和快速治疗方案的圆锥角膜交联:分界线差异和12个月的结果
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Dec 2;55(12):8371-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15444.
8
Individualized Corneal Cross-linking With Riboflavin and UV-A in Ultrathin Corneas: The Sub400 Protocol.超薄角膜中核黄素与紫外线A的个体化角膜交联:Sub400方案
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;224:133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
9
Conventional versus accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of keratoconus.传统角膜胶原交联术与加速角膜胶原交联术治疗圆锥角膜的对比
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan-Feb;44(1):8-14. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12571. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
10
Corneal Stromal Demarcation Line Depth Following Standard and a Modified High Intensity Corneal Cross-linking Protocol.标准及改良高强度角膜交联方案后的角膜基质分界线深度
J Refract Surg. 2016 Apr;32(4):218-22. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160216-01.

引用本文的文献

1
Influencing Factors in Corneal Densitometry Recovery After Accelerated Cross-Linking for Keratoconus.圆锥角膜加速交联术后角膜密度测量恢复的影响因素
J Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 28;2025:9490950. doi: 10.1155/joph/9490950. eCollection 2025.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Corneal Cross-Linking in Patients Affected by Keratoconus: Long-Term Results.角膜交联术治疗圆锥角膜患者的安全性和疗效:长期结果。
Med Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;11(2):43. doi: 10.3390/medsci11020043.
3
Comparison Between Pulsed and Continuous Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Protocols.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Corneal Riboflavin Gradients Using Dextran and HPMC Solutions.使用右旋糖酐和羟丙基甲基纤维素溶液对角膜核黄素梯度的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2016 Dec 1;32(12):798-802. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160920-03.
2
Intraoperative OCT Pachymetry in Patients Undergoing Dextran-Free Riboflavin UVA Accelerated Corneal Collagen Crosslinking.接受无右旋糖酐核黄素紫外线A加速角膜胶原交联手术患者的术中光学相干断层扫描测厚法
Curr Eye Res. 2016 Oct;41(10):1310-1315. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1118130. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
Conventional versus accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of keratoconus.
脉冲式与连续式加速角膜交联方案的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 May 16;17:1407-1413. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S409178. eCollection 2023.
4
Demarcation Line Depth in Epithelium-Off Corneal Cross-Linking Performed at the Slit Lamp.裂隙灯下进行的上皮下角膜交联术中的分界线深度
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):5873. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195873.
5
Decentered Individualized Sphero-Cylindrical (DISC) Ablation and Corneal Crosslinking in Patient with Progressive Keratoconus.偏心个体化球柱镜(DISC)消融术联合角膜交联术治疗进展期圆锥角膜患者
Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2022 Jul 21;2022:1839848. doi: 10.1155/2022/1839848. eCollection 2022.
6
Topography versus non-topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy with corneal cross-linking variations in keratoconus.圆锥角膜中地形图引导与非地形图引导的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术联合角膜交联的差异
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 May 18;15(5):721-727. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.05.05. eCollection 2022.
7
Evaluation of Demarcation Line after Epithelium-Off Iontophoresis Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus.上皮剥脱性离子导入角膜胶原交联治疗进行性圆锥角膜后分界线的评估
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 26;10(15):3295. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153295.
8
Accelerated, Pulsed Collagen Cross-Linking versus the Dresden Protocol in Keratoconus: A Case Series.加速、脉冲胶原蛋白交联术与圆锥角膜的德累斯顿方案:病例系列。
Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(4):332-337. doi: 10.1159/000505598. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
9
Correlation between corneal stromal demarcation line depth and topographic outcomes after two pulsed-light-accelerated crosslinking protocols.两种脉冲光加速交联方案后角膜基质分界线深度与地形学结果之间的相关性
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 30;13:1665-1673. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S206103. eCollection 2019.
10
Ultrahigh-resolution anterior segment optical coherence tomography for analysis of corneal microarchitecture during wound healing.超高分辨率眼前节光学相干断层扫描分析角膜伤口愈合过程中的微观结构。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;97(5):e761-e771. doi: 10.1111/aos.14053. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
传统角膜胶原交联术与加速角膜胶原交联术治疗圆锥角膜的对比
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan-Feb;44(1):8-14. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12571. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
4
Current Protocols of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking: Visual, Refractive, and Tomographic Outcomes.角膜胶原交联的当前方案:视觉、屈光和断层扫描结果
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;160(2):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.019. Epub 2015 May 23.
5
Changes in straylight and densitometry values after corneal collagen crosslinking.角膜胶原交联术后杂散光和密度测量值的变化。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 May;41(5):1038-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.07.043. Epub 2015 May 5.
6
Stromal demarcation line induced by corneal cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus and nonkeratoconic asymmetric topography.圆锥角膜和非圆锥角膜不对称形态眼中角膜交联诱导的基质分界线
Cornea. 2015 Feb;34(2):199-203. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000305.
7
Corneal cross-linking in keratoconus using the standard and rapid treatment protocol: differences in demarcation line and 12-month outcomes.使用标准和快速治疗方案的圆锥角膜交联:分界线差异和12个月的结果
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Dec 2;55(12):8371-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15444.
8
High-irradiance accelerated collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus: six-month results.高辐照度加速胶原交联治疗圆锥角膜:六个月结果
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jun;40(6):1032-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.014.
9
Corneal biomechanical properties at different corneal cross-linking (CXL) irradiances.不同角膜交联(CXL)辐照强度下的角膜生物力学特性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 2;55(5):2881-4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13748.
10
Corneal stroma demarcation line after standard and high-intensity collagen crosslinking determined with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描确定标准和高强度胶原交联后的角膜基质分界线。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 May;40(5):736-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.029. Epub 2014 Mar 12.