• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种角膜交联方案治疗圆锥角膜后角膜基质分界线的眼前节光学相干断层扫描评估。

Corneal stromal demarcation line after 4 protocols of corneal crosslinking in keratoconus determined with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

机构信息

From the Department of Biotechnology and Medical-Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina (Latina), Italy.

From the Department of Biotechnology and Medical-Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina (Latina), Italy.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 May;44(5):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.02.017.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.02.017
PMID:29685772
Abstract

PURPOSE

To use anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to compare corneal stromal demarcation line depth after 4 treatment protocols of corneal crosslinking (CXL).

SETTING

Eye Clinic, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina (Latina), Italy.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

Patients with progressive keratoconus were delegated to one of the following CXL treatments: (1) conventional epithelium (epi)-off 3 mW/cm according to the standard Dresden protocol (C-CXL group), (2) accelerated epi-off 10 mW/cm (A-CXL group), (3) transepithelial epi-on 3 mW/cm (TE-CXL group), or (4) transepithelial epi-on by iontophoresis 10 mW/cm (I-CXL group). Two independent observers measured the corneal stromal demarcation line using AS-OCT.

RESULTS

The study comprised 70 patients (120 eyes, 30 eyes in each group). The corneal stromal demarcation line was identified on AS-OCT scans in 109 eyes (90.8%). One month after the treatment, the mean stromal demarcation line depth was 275.05 μm ± 41.83 (SD) in the C-CXL group, 279.35 ± 33.07 μm in the A-CXL group, 132.60 ± 22.14 μm in the TE-CXL group, and 235.40 ± 37.08 μm in the I-CXL group. The difference in stromal demarcation line depth was not statistically significant between the C-CXL and A-CXL group, but it was statistically significant (P < .05) between the epi-off and epi-on CXL groups and between the 2 epi-on groups, where the demarcation line was significantly deeper in the I-CXL group than in the TE-CXL group.

CONCLUSION

The corneal stromal demarcation line was significantly deeper after epi-off 30-minute standard CXL treatment and after epi-off 9-minute accelerated CXL with high-intensity ultraviolet-A irradiation.

摘要

目的

使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)比较 4 种角膜交联(CXL)治疗方案后角膜基质分界线深度。

设置

意大利罗马萨皮恩扎大学特兰奇纳(拉蒂纳)眼科诊所。

设计

前瞻性病例系列。

方法

将进展性圆锥角膜患者分为以下 4 种 CXL 治疗之一:(1)标准德累斯顿方案的常规上皮(epi)-off 3 mW/cm(C-CXL 组),(2)加速 epi-off 10 mW/cm(A-CXL 组),(3)上皮内 3 mW/cm 的经上皮(TE-CXL 组),或(4)上皮内 10 mW/cm 的离子电渗疗法(I-CXL 组)。两名独立观察者使用 AS-OCT 测量角膜基质分界线。

结果

该研究纳入了 70 例患者(120 只眼,每组 30 只眼)。在 109 只眼中(90.8%)AS-OCT 扫描中可识别角膜基质分界线。治疗后 1 个月,C-CXL 组基质分界线深度的平均值为 275.05 ± 41.83 μm(标准差),A-CXL 组为 279.35 ± 33.07 μm,TE-CXL 组为 132.60 ± 22.14 μm,I-CXL 组为 235.40 ± 37.08 μm。C-CXL 组和 A-CXL 组的基质分界线深度差异无统计学意义,但 epi-off 和 epi-on CXL 组之间以及 2 个 epi-on 组之间的差异有统计学意义(P <.05),其中 I-CXL 组的分界线明显比 TE-CXL 组深。

结论

30 分钟标准 epi-off CXL 治疗和高强度紫外线-A 照射下的 9 分钟 epi-off 加速 CXL 后,角膜基质分界线明显更深。

相似文献

1
Corneal stromal demarcation line after 4 protocols of corneal crosslinking in keratoconus determined with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.四种角膜交联方案治疗圆锥角膜后角膜基质分界线的眼前节光学相干断层扫描评估。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 May;44(5):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.02.017.
2
Corneal Stromal Demarcation Line Depth Following Standard and a Modified High Intensity Corneal Cross-linking Protocol.标准及改良高强度角膜交联方案后的角膜基质分界线深度
J Refract Surg. 2016 Apr;32(4):218-22. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160216-01.
3
Correlation of Demarcation Line Depth With Medium-Term Efficacy of Different Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Protocols in Keratoconus.圆锥角膜中分界线深度与不同角膜胶原交联方案中期疗效的相关性
Cornea. 2018 Dec;37(12):1511-1516. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001733.
4
Evaluation of corneal stromal demarcation line depth following standard and a modified-accelerated collagen cross-linking protocol.标准及改良加速胶原交联方案后角膜基质分界线深度的评估
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct;158(4):671-675.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
5
Corneal stromal demarcation line after accelerated crosslinking using continuous and pulsed light.使用连续光和脉冲光加速交联后的角膜基质分界线
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Nov;41(11):2546-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.033.
6
Corneal stroma demarcation line after standard and high-intensity collagen crosslinking determined with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描确定标准和高强度胶原交联后的角膜基质分界线。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 May;40(5):736-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.029. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
7
Corneal stromal demarcation line determined with anterior segment optical coherence tomography following a very high intensity corneal collagen cross-linking protocol.采用极高强度角膜胶原交联方案后,通过眼前节光学相干断层扫描确定的角膜基质分界线。
Cornea. 2015 Jun;34(6):664-7. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000427.
8
Visibility and Depth of the Stromal Demarcation Line After Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography: Comparison Between Isoosmolar and Hypoosmolar Riboflavin.使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描技术观察角膜胶原交联术后基质分界线的可视性和深度:等渗与低渗核黄素的比较
Cornea. 2018 May;37(5):567-573. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001493.
9
Corneal cross-linking in keratoconus using the standard and rapid treatment protocol: differences in demarcation line and 12-month outcomes.使用标准和快速治疗方案的圆锥角膜交联:分界线差异和12个月的结果
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Dec 2;55(12):8371-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15444.
10
[Topography-guided transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking by sequential ultraviolet A irradiation in different diameters for progressive keratoconus in adults].[成人进行性圆锥角膜不同直径连续紫外线A照射的地形图引导经上皮角膜胶原交联术]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Oct 11;59(10):791-804. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20221216-00642.

引用本文的文献

1
Keratoconus: exploring fundamentals and future perspectives - a comprehensive systematic review.圆锥角膜:探索基础与未来展望——一项全面的系统综述
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 20;16:25158414241232258. doi: 10.1177/25158414241232258. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Epithelium-on versus epithelium-off corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.角膜胶原交联术治疗圆锥角膜的上皮下与上皮内模式:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun;262(6):1683-1692. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06287-8. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
3
Five-year results of iontophoresis-assisted transepithelial corneal cross-linking for keratoconus.
电渗透辅助经上皮角膜交联术治疗圆锥角膜的 5 年疗效。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;43(10):3601-3607. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02768-1. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
4
Management of Post-LASIK Ectasia.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜扩张症的管理
Mater Sociomed. 2023 Mar;35(1):73-78. doi: 10.5455/msm.2023.35.73-78.
5
Demarcation Line Depth in Epithelium-Off Corneal Cross-Linking Performed at the Slit Lamp.裂隙灯下进行的上皮下角膜交联术中的分界线深度
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):5873. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195873.
6
Evaluation of Demarcation Line after Epithelium-Off Iontophoresis Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus.上皮剥脱性离子导入角膜胶原交联治疗进行性圆锥角膜后分界线的评估
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 26;10(15):3295. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153295.
7
[Stage-appropriate treatment of keratoconus].圆锥角膜的分期适宜治疗
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Oct;118(10):1069-1088. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01410-8. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
8
Evaluation of phacoemulsification (ultrasound) cataract surgery on the dynamics of the anterior segment of primary angle closure by AS-OCT.利用AS-OCT评估超声乳化白内障手术对原发性闭角型青光眼眼前节动力学的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):3156-3164. eCollection 2021.
9
The efficiency and safety of oxygen-supplemented accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking.氧辅助加速经上皮角膜交联术的效率和安全性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;41(9):2993-3005. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01859-1. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
10
Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.经上皮角膜交联与角膜上皮瓣下角膜交联治疗进行性圆锥角膜的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 23;3(3):CD013512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013512.pub2.