Ophthalmology Unit, Ophthalmica Eye Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(4):332-337. doi: 10.1159/000505598. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
The aim of our study was to compare the depth of the demarcation line developing in the cornea after the standard Dresden protocol versus the accelerated, pulsed, epithelium-off corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL).
This was a nonrandomized, retrospective case series. Patients with progressive keratoconus were treated with either the standard Dresden protocol (Group 1) or accelerated, epithelium-off CXL using the Avedro (Waltham, MA, USA) device (Group 2). The accelerated CXL protocol involved 18 min of pulsed ultraviolet-A (20 mW/cm2, 7.2 J/cm2, pulsed pro-file: 1 s on, 2 s off). The depth of the demarcation line was measured about 3 months postoperatively.
Fifty-nine eyes of 35 subjects were included in the analysis. Group 1 consisted of 19 eyes, and Group 2 of 40 eyes. The mean age of the participants was 22.21 years in Group 1 and 26.55 years in Group 2 (p = 0.184). The mean preoperative K value was 44.89 D in Group 1 and 45.20 D in Group 2 (p = 0.768). The depth of the demarcation line was 322.50 μm in Group 1 and 319.95 μm in Group 2 (p = 0.937).
The demarcation line depth was not statistically significantly different between the two protocols. The significance of the demarcation line depth has not been fully clarified in the literature. Our results support the contention that these two techniques may have similar structural outcomes and ef-ficacies in the treatment of keratoconus.
本研究旨在比较标准德累斯顿方案与加速、脉冲、去上皮角膜胶原交联(CXL)后角膜中分界线的深度。
这是一项非随机、回顾性病例系列研究。进展性圆锥角膜患者接受标准德累斯顿方案(第 1 组)或使用 Avedro(马萨诸塞州沃尔瑟姆,美国)设备进行加速、去上皮 CXL(第 2 组)治疗。加速 CXL 方案涉及 18 分钟的脉冲紫外线-A(20 mW/cm2,7.2 J/cm2,脉冲轮廓:1 秒开,2 秒关)。术后约 3 个月测量分界线的深度。
59 只眼的 35 名患者纳入分析。第 1 组包括 19 只眼,第 2 组包括 40 只眼。第 1 组参与者的平均年龄为 22.21 岁,第 2 组为 26.55 岁(p = 0.184)。第 1 组术前 K 值的平均值为 44.89 D,第 2 组为 45.20 D(p = 0.768)。第 1 组分界线的深度为 322.50 μm,第 2 组为 319.95 μm(p = 0.937)。
两种方案之间分界线的深度没有统计学上的显著差异。分界线深度的意义在文献中尚未完全阐明。我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即这两种技术在治疗圆锥角膜方面可能具有相似的结构效果和疗效。