• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斜角切口:证据是什么?

Beveled Incisions: What is the Evidence?

作者信息

Brown Shelby, Mirmanesh Michael, Song Ping, Coombs Demetrius, Rengifo David, Pu Lee L Q

机构信息

Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California Davis Health System, 2221 Stockton Blvd., Room 2125, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;42(3):743-747. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1105-2. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00266-018-1105-2
PMID:29476262
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although many aesthetic surgeons believe that beveling the angle of an incision improves the aesthetic outcome with regard to scaring, the literature remains scarce largely because few studies have been conducted.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review therefore aims to identify whether using a beveled incision adds an aesthetic benefit, to determine whether there is a specific angle that yields a superior outcome, and for the first time, to present a complete discussion of this subject for practicing surgeons.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed database to search for primary articles. The main inclusion criteria were primary journal articles investigating the use of a beveled angle via a controlled study.

RESULTS

A total of fifty-four publications were reviewed, with only four publications including 124 patients suitable for use in this systematic review. All the studies concluded that the use of a beveled angle incision improved aesthetic outcomes, with the ideal angle ranging from 10° to 45°.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a beveled angle incision can improve scar aesthetics and encourages the regrowth of hair follicles and shafts through the scars via multiple mechanisms. Nevertheless, the paucity of literature available to the practitioner compels further research assessing this important topic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

尽管许多美容外科医生认为,将切口角度切成斜角可改善疤痕方面的美学效果,但由于相关研究较少,这方面的文献仍然匮乏。

目的

因此,本系统评价旨在确定采用斜角切口是否能带来美学益处,确定是否存在能产生更佳效果的特定角度,并首次为执业外科医生全面讨论这一主题。

方法

使用PubMed数据库进行全面的文献检索,以查找原始文章。主要纳入标准是通过对照研究调查斜角使用情况的原始期刊文章。

结果

共审查了54篇出版物,只有4篇出版物包含124例适合用于本系统评价的患者。所有研究均得出结论,使用斜角切口可改善美学效果,理想角度为10°至45°。

结论

使用斜角切口可改善疤痕美学,并通过多种机制促进毛囊和毛干穿过疤痕再生。然而,可供从业者参考的文献较少,这促使我们进一步研究评估这一重要课题。

证据水平III:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266 。

相似文献

1
Beveled Incisions: What is the Evidence?斜角切口:证据是什么?
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;42(3):743-747. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1105-2. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
2
Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients.腋窝切口与乳房下皱襞切口隆胸术后瘢痕评估:中国患者的长期随访
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):699-706. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0671-4. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
3
The Super-High SMAS Facelift Technique with Tailor Tack Plication.采用定制缝合折叠术的超高SMAS面部提升技术
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;42(6):1531-1539. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1223-x. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
4
Modified Rhytidectomy that Produces a More Natural Look: Experience with 110 Cases.改良除皱术打造更自然外观:110例经验
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):670-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0670-5. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
5
Isolated neck-lifting procedure: isolated stork lift.单纯颈部提升术:单纯鹳式提升术。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;37(2):205-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-0002-3. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
6
Effect of Dermal Thickness on Scars in Women with Type III-IV Fitzpatrick Skin.皮肤厚度对 Fitzpatrick III-IV 型皮肤女性瘢痕的影响。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;39(3):318-24. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0466-z. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
7
Assessment Tools for Facial Rejuvenation Treatment: A Review.面部年轻化治疗的评估工具:综述
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Aug;40(4):556-65. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0640-y. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
Facial Fat Grafting: Why, Where, How, and How Much.面部脂肪移植:原因、部位、方法及剂量
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Oct;42(5):1278-1297. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1179-x. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
9
Triple-S Lift for Facial Rejuvenation.三重提升术在面部年轻化中的应用。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Oct;43(5):1204-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01319-3. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
10
LCL: (Locked Cheek Lift) Three-Dimensional Cheek Lift and Inferior Palpebral Rejuvenation.LCL:(锁定脸颊提升术)三维脸颊提升与下睑年轻化
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;42(3):825-838. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1086-1. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Dermal Steal Technique: A Single-Surgeon Retrospective Evaluation of Aesthetic Outcomes of Beveled versus Conventional Perpendicular Skin Incisions.真皮窃取技术:单一外科医生对斜角与传统垂直皮肤切口美学效果的回顾性评估
Indian J Plast Surg. 2024 Jun 5;57(6):469-473. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787566. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Comment on "Reply: Comment on BIA-ALCL: Comparing the Risk Profiles of Smooth and Textured Breast Implants".关于《回复:对乳房植入物相关间变性大细胞淋巴瘤的评论:比较光面和毛面乳房植入物的风险概况》的评论
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Aug;48(15):3051-3052. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03556-z. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
3
Revision Facelift and Neck Lift.
修复性面部提升术和颈部提升术。
Semin Plast Surg. 2021 May;35(2):88-97. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727208. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
4
Outcome of Beveled versus Vertical IncisionTechnique after Reconstructive or Aesthetic Facial Surgery.面部重建或美容手术后斜切与垂直切口技术的效果
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 May 23;7(5):e2286. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002286. eCollection 2019 May.