• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部重建或美容手术后斜切与垂直切口技术的效果

Outcome of Beveled versus Vertical IncisionTechnique after Reconstructive or Aesthetic Facial Surgery.

作者信息

Feinendegen Dominik L, Waldkircher Natascha J, Bannwart Fridolin, Kalbermatten Daniel F, Tremp Mathias

机构信息

Institute of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Zuerich-Zollikon, Switzerland.

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 May 23;7(5):e2286. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002286. eCollection 2019 May.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002286
PMID:31333986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6571317/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We suggest that the degree of scar improvement with a beveled incision technique with an angle of about 20 degrees to the skin can be translated for various reconstructions on the face and can be verified by a validated clinical assessment scale and histology.

METHODS

A total of 5 patients (2 men and 3 women) with a mean age of 68 years (range 54-84 years) undergoing elective surgeries on the face for tumor excision or cosmetic procedures were included. The beveled incision technique was compared with the conventional vertical incision (control group). Outcome measures were major and minor complications, pain and scar quality using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and histomorphologic scar assessment.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 7.6 months (range 6-13 months), all patients healed uneventfully without pain, hypertrophic scars, or infection. We found a better overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score in the beveled incision technique group (15 ± 3.4) compared with the conventional vertical incision group (18.4 ± 7.8, = 0.7). Histomorphologic analyses showed after 6 months less scar zone, less inflammatory reaction, fewer macrophages, less foreign body reaction, and more hair follicles in the beveled incision technique group compared with the vertical incision group.

CONCLUSION

We showed that the beveled incision technique using a 20-degree angle in elective surgeries on the face yields a cosmetic pleasant result for both the patient and the surgeon, which also goes in line with our histomorphologic analyses.

摘要

背景

我们认为,与皮肤呈约20度角的斜切技术所带来的瘢痕改善程度可应用于面部的各种重建手术,并且可以通过经过验证的临床评估量表和组织学检查来验证。

方法

纳入了5例患者(2例男性和3例女性),平均年龄68岁(范围54 - 84岁),他们因肿瘤切除或美容手术而接受面部择期手术。将斜切技术与传统垂直切口(对照组)进行比较。观察指标包括主要和次要并发症、使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表评估的疼痛和瘢痕质量,以及组织形态学瘢痕评估。

结果

平均随访7.6个月(范围6 - 13个月)后,所有患者均顺利愈合,无疼痛、增生性瘢痕或感染。我们发现,与传统垂直切口组(18.4 ± 7.8,P = 0.7)相比,斜切技术组的患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表总体评分更好(15 ± 3.4)。组织形态学分析显示,6个月后,与垂直切口组相比,斜切技术组的瘢痕区域更小、炎症反应更轻、巨噬细胞更少、异物反应更少且毛囊更多。

结论

我们表明,在面部择期手术中使用20度角的斜切技术对患者和外科医生而言都能产生美观的效果,这也与我们的组织形态学分析结果相符。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceda/6571317/26577bcc5100/gox-7-e2286-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceda/6571317/e25336f17193/gox-7-e2286-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceda/6571317/1beedcaee357/gox-7-e2286-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceda/6571317/4006f4f22270/gox-7-e2286-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceda/6571317/26577bcc5100/gox-7-e2286-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceda/6571317/e25336f17193/gox-7-e2286-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceda/6571317/1beedcaee357/gox-7-e2286-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceda/6571317/4006f4f22270/gox-7-e2286-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceda/6571317/26577bcc5100/gox-7-e2286-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcome of Beveled versus Vertical IncisionTechnique after Reconstructive or Aesthetic Facial Surgery.面部重建或美容手术后斜切与垂直切口技术的效果
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 May 23;7(5):e2286. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002286. eCollection 2019 May.
2
Beveled Incisions: What is the Evidence?斜角切口:证据是什么?
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;42(3):743-747. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1105-2. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
3
Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients.腋窝切口与乳房下皱襞切口隆胸术后瘢痕评估:中国患者的长期随访
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):699-706. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0671-4. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
4
Isolated neck-lifting procedure: isolated stork lift.单纯颈部提升术:单纯鹳式提升术。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;37(2):205-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-0002-3. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
5
A single-institution retrospective evaluation of Mohs incision angles and histopathologic specimen quality.单一机构回顾性评估 Mohs 切口角度和组织病理学标本质量。
Int J Dermatol. 2019 Oct;58(10):1210-1211. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14591. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
6
Clinical and Histological Evaluation of Tissue Healing in Beveled or Perpendicular Vertical Releasing Incision.斜行或垂直松弛切口的组织愈合的临床和组织学评估。
J Endod. 2021 Oct;47(10):1625-1630. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
7
[Effects of scar excision combined with negative-pressure on repair of hypertrophic scar in burn children].[瘢痕切除联合负压对小儿烧伤增生性瘢痕修复的影响]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 20;33(7):410-414. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.07.003.
8
The use of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and rating scale to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes of totally thoracoscopic cardiac surgery.应用瘢痕美容评估及评分量表评价全胸腔镜心脏手术的美容效果。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep 11;15(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01294-w.
9
The long-term follow-up results of external dacryocystorhinostomy skin incision scar with "W incision".“W 形切口”外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术皮肤切口瘢痕的长期随访结果
Orbit. 2013 Dec;32(6):349-55. doi: 10.3109/01676830.2013.822898. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
10
Robot-assisted Sistrunk's operation, total thyroidectomy, and neck dissection via a transaxillary and retroauricular (TARA) approach in papillary carcinoma arising in thyroglossal duct cyst and thyroid gland.经腋后(TARA)入路机器人辅助施行 Sistrunk 手术、甲状腺全切除术和颈淋巴结清扫术治疗甲状舌管囊肿和甲状腺起源的乳头状癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4259-61. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2674-y. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Beveled vs. Perpendicular Incisions and The Effects on Wound Healing: A Review.斜切与垂直切口及其对伤口愈合的影响:综述
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 Nov 26;15:100226. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100226. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
An Algorithm for Prevention of Unsightly Facial Scars Considering the Newest Research Insights.一种基于最新研究见解预防面部难看疤痕的算法
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Nov 7;10(11):e4635. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004635. eCollection 2022 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Flat Incision Technique for Reconstructive Brow Surgery: A Wound Healing Model and Clinical Evaluation.用于重建性眉部手术的扁平切口技术:一种伤口愈合模型及临床评估
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Feb 26;6(2):e1684. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001684. eCollection 2018 Feb.
2
Beveled Incisions: What is the Evidence?斜角切口:证据是什么?
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;42(3):743-747. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1105-2. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
3
Brow reduction, reshaping and suspension by a 20-degree beveled brow incision technique.
采用20度斜行眉部切口技术进行眉部缩小、重塑及悬吊术。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Aug;44(8):958-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 May 24.
4
Patient and observer scar assessment scores favour the late appearance of a transverse cervical incision over a vertical incision in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for stroke risk reduction.在接受颈动脉内膜切除术以降低中风风险的患者中,患者和观察者疤痕评估评分显示,横向颈部切口比纵向切口的疤痕出现得更晚。
Can J Surg. 2015 Aug;58(4):245-9. doi: 10.1503/cjs.016714.
5
Does wound eversion improve cosmetic outcome?: Results of a randomized, split-scar, comparative trial.伤口外翻是否能改善美容效果?一项随机、双切口、对照试验的结果
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Apr;72(4):668-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.032. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
6
The direct brow-lift using the flat incision technique.采用平切口技术的直接提眉术。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;36(2):468-71. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9786-9.
7
Strategies for prevention of scars: what can we learn from fetal skin?预防疤痕的策略:我们能从胎儿皮肤中学到什么?
Int J Dermatol. 2011 Jan;50(1):85-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04678.x. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
8
Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial.剖宫产术后不同皮肤缝合方法的美容效果:一项随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):36.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
9
Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring.必须挑战皮肤瘢痕的成见:自我认知在皮肤瘢痕形成中的重要性。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jun;63(6):1022-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.03.019. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
10
The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表:一种用于瘢痕评估的可靠且可行的工具。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56.