School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO; and Department of Health & Exercise Science, 1582 Campus Delivery, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1582.
PM R. 2018 Oct;10(10):1040-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
Suspension systems are designed to reduce shock and vibration exposure. An aftermarket rear-wheel suspension system is now available for manual tilt-in-space wheelchairs.
To compare quantifiable shock and vibration on a rigid manual tilt-in-space wheelchair to published data on manual wheelchairs and to determine whether aftermarket rear suspension system will significantly decrease shock exposure when traversing common obstacles.
Cross-sectional.
Research laboratory.
Ten healthy non-wheelchair users.
Subjects seated in a manual tilt-in-space wheelchair were pushed over 4 different obstacles (an exterior door threshold, truncated domes, 2-cm descent, and 2-cm ascent) with the chair as manufactured and with the suspension system installed.
Superior/inferior and anterior/posterior accelerations were assessed at the seat pan with and without the use of ISO 2631-1 standards. Peak accelerations were analyzed from the door threshold, 2-cm descent and 2-cm ascent. Root mean square acceleration (RMSa) values were analyzed from the truncated domes, and vibration dose value (VDV) was analyzed for all surfaces.
There were no differences in time spent over the 4 obstacles between rigid and suspended conditions (P≥.064). Suspension decreased the peak acceleration at the rear wheel when it initially impacted the door threshold, and when the rear wheel traversed the 2-cm descent and ascent (P≤.043). ISO 2631-1 frequency weighting, placing emphasis on frequencies most harmful to humans, also supports suspension reducing peak accelerations at the rear wheel both when it initially impacted and left the door threshold, and when the rear wheel descended 2 cm (P≤.049). Suspension also reduced the truncated dome RMSa as well as the door threshold, 2-cm descent, and total VDV (P≤.041).
The results indicate that rigid manual tilt-in-space wheelchairs respond to rough surfaces in a similar fashion to previously studied rigid wheelchairs. Furthermore, the aftermarket suspension system reduces some aspects of shock and vibration exposure, also consistent with previously studied suspension systems.
NA.
悬挂系统旨在减少冲击和振动暴露。现在,手动倾躺空间轮椅有后市场的后轮悬挂系统。
将刚性手动倾躺空间轮椅的可量化冲击和振动与手动轮椅的已发表数据进行比较,并确定后悬挂系统在穿越常见障碍物时是否会显著降低冲击暴露。
横断面。
研究实验室。
10 名健康的非轮椅使用者。
参与者坐在手动倾躺空间轮椅上,在有和没有悬挂系统的情况下,推动轮椅越过 4 个不同的障碍物(外部门槛、截顶圆顶、2 厘米下降和 2 厘米上升)。
使用和不使用 ISO 2631-1 标准,评估座椅板的上下和前后加速度。分析门门槛、2 厘米下降和 2 厘米上升的峰值加速度。分析截顶圆顶的均方根加速度(RMSa)值,分析所有表面的振动剂量值(VDV)。
刚性和悬挂条件下在 4 个障碍物上花费的时间没有差异(P≥.064)。悬挂系统降低了后轮初始冲击门门槛时以及后轮穿越 2 厘米下降和上升时的峰值加速度(P≤.043)。ISO 2631-1 频率加权,强调对人类最有害的频率,也支持悬挂系统降低后轮初始冲击和离开门门槛时以及后轮下降 2 厘米时的峰值加速度(P≤.049)。悬挂系统还降低了截顶圆顶 RMSa 以及门门槛、2 厘米下降和总 VDV(P≤.041)。
结果表明,刚性手动倾躺空间轮椅对粗糙表面的反应与以前研究的刚性轮椅相似。此外,后市场悬挂系统减少了冲击和振动暴露的某些方面,这也与以前研究的悬挂系统一致。
无。