Suppr超能文献

带和不带悬架的手动轮椅的座椅和脚凳震动情况

Seat and footrest shocks and vibrations in manual wheelchairs with and without suspension.

作者信息

Cooper Rory A, Wolf Erik, Fitzgerald Shirley G, Boninger Michael L, Ulerich Rhys, Ammer William A

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Science & Technology and Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. rcooper+@pitt.edu

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jan;84(1):96-102. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50069.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in the shock and vibration transmitted to an occupant of a manual wheelchair with and without suspension caster forks and with and without rear-suspension systems.

DESIGN

Repeated-measures engineering testing.

SETTING

Rehabilitation engineering center with a wheelchair standards test laboratory.

SPECIMENS

Six manual wheelchairs.

INTERVENTIONS

An American National Standards Institute/Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America wheelchair test dummy and a Hybrid III test dummy were used to test shock and vibration transmission in wheelchairs equipped with original equipment manufacturer (OEM) caster forks and suspension caster forks. Ultralight wheelchairs, half of which had factory-equipped rear-suspension systems, were tested. Testing was conducted on a double-drum wheelchair test machine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Shocks were examined by using peak acceleration and the frequency at which peak acceleration occurs for the seat and footrest. Vibration was characterized by the acceleration power per octave for the seat and footrest.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in the peak accelerations at the seat (P=.0004) and footrest (P=.0007) between the wheelchairs with the OEM caster forks and those with the suspension casters. The wheelchairs with suspension had significantly different frequencies at which the peak accelerations occurred for both the seat (P=.01) and footrest (P=.0001). The wheelchairs with suspension caster forks had a lower total power per octave than the wheelchairs with the OEM caster forks. For the footrest vibrations, significant differences were found between the types of caster forks for all octaves except those associated with frequencies more than 78.75Hz. There were significant differences for wheelchairs with and without rear suspension for total power per octave of seat vibrations in the octaves between 7.81 and 9.84Hz (P=.01) and 12.40 and 15.63Hz (P=.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Suspension caster forks reduce the shock and vibration exposure to the user of a manual wheelchair. Rear-suspension systems reduce some of the factors related to shock and vibration exposure, but they are not clearly superior to traditional designs.

摘要

目的

研究配备和未配备悬架脚轮叉以及配备和未配备后悬架系统的手动轮椅传递给乘坐者的冲击和振动差异。

设计

重复测量工程测试。

地点

设有轮椅标准测试实验室的康复工程中心。

样本

六辆手动轮椅。

干预措施

使用美国国家标准学会/北美康复工程与辅助技术协会轮椅测试假人和Hybrid III测试假人,测试配备原始设备制造商(OEM)脚轮叉和悬架脚轮叉的轮椅的冲击和振动传递情况。对超轻型轮椅进行测试,其中一半配备了工厂安装的后悬架系统。测试在双鼓式轮椅测试机上进行。

主要观察指标

通过座椅和脚凳的峰值加速度以及峰值加速度出现的频率来检测冲击。通过座椅和脚凳每倍频程的加速度功率来表征振动。

结果

配备OEM脚轮叉的轮椅与配备悬架脚轮叉的轮椅在座椅(P = 0.0004)和脚凳(P = 0.0007)的峰值加速度上存在显著差异。配备悬架的轮椅在座椅(P = 0.01)和脚凳(P = 0.0001)峰值加速度出现的频率上有显著差异。配备悬架脚轮叉的轮椅每倍频程的总功率低于配备OEM脚轮叉的轮椅。对于脚凳振动,除了与频率超过78.75Hz相关的那些倍频程外,在所有倍频程的脚轮叉类型之间都发现了显著差异。对于座椅振动,在7.81至9.84Hz(P = 0.01)和12.40至15.63Hz(P = 0.008)的倍频程中,配备和未配备后悬架的轮椅在每倍频程总功率上存在显著差异。

结论

悬架脚轮叉可减少手动轮椅使用者所受的冲击和振动。后悬架系统减少了一些与冲击和振动暴露相关的因素,但并不明显优于传统设计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验