Cooper Rory A, Wolf Erik, Fitzgerald Shirley G, Kellerher Annmarie, Ammer William, Boninger Michael L, Cooper Rosemarie
Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. rcooper+@pitt.edu
J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(5):468-75. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2004.11752239.
Obstacles such as bumps, curb descents, and uneven driving surfaces cause vibrations that affect the wheelchair, and in turn, the wheelchair user. Chronic exposure can cause low-back pain, disk degeneration, and other harmful effects. Little research has been conducted to assess the vibrations experienced by wheelchair users.
The purpose of this study was to conduct an evaluation of the vibration exposure during electric-powered wheelchair driving and mechanical energy requirements for manual wheelchair propulsion over selected sidewalk surfaces. The goal was to determine the criteria for a wheelchair-pedestrian access route that does not require excessive propulsive work or expose wheelchair users to potentially harmful vibrations.
Ten unimpaired individuals participated in this study. Six sidewalk surfaces were tested. Measured variables included power of the acceleration per octave, mechanical work to propel over surfaces, peak acceleration, and frequency at which peak acceleration occurs.
For both the manual and electric-powered wheelchair, at 1 m/s, significant differences were found in peak accelerations between the seat and footrest (P < 0.0001) and between the sidewalk surfaces (P = 0.004). The greatest risk for injury caused by shock and vibration exposure occurs at frequencies near the natural frequency of seated humans (4-15 Hz). The values for work required to propel over the surfaces tested were not statistically significantly different. Besides appearance and construction, the only distinguishing characteristic was surface roughness caused by the joints.
When treating the poured concrete sidewalk as the standard, surfaces 2, 3, 5, and 6 compared most favorably in terms of vibration exposure, whereas surface 4 produced mixed results. Surfaces 2, 3, 5, and 6 yielded results that were similar to the poured concrete sidewalk and could be considered acceptable for wheelchair users. In conclusion, surfaces other than the traditional poured concrete can be used for pedestrian access routes without adding vibration exposure or reducing propulsion efficiency.
诸如颠簸、路缘下降和不平整的驾驶表面等障碍物会引起振动,这些振动会影响轮椅,进而影响轮椅使用者。长期接触可能导致腰痛、椎间盘退变和其他有害影响。目前很少有研究评估轮椅使用者所经历的振动。
本研究的目的是评估电动轮椅行驶过程中的振动暴露情况以及手动轮椅在选定人行道表面推进所需的机械能。目标是确定一条既不需要过多推进力工作,又不会使轮椅使用者暴露于潜在有害振动的轮椅行人通道标准。
10名未受损个体参与了本研究。测试了6种人行道表面。测量变量包括每倍频程的加速度功率、在表面上推进的机械功、峰值加速度以及峰值加速度出现时的频率。
对于手动和电动轮椅,在1米/秒的速度下,座椅和脚凳之间的峰值加速度存在显著差异(P<0.0001),人行道表面之间也存在显著差异(P = 0.004)。由冲击和振动暴露引起的最大受伤风险发生在接近坐着的人的固有频率(4 - 15赫兹)的频率处。在测试表面上推进所需的功的值在统计学上没有显著差异。除了外观和构造外,唯一的区别特征是由接缝引起的表面粗糙度。
将现浇混凝土人行道作为标准时,表面2、3、5和6在振动暴露方面表现最为良好,而表面4的结果好坏参半。表面2、3、5和6产生的结果与现浇混凝土人行道相似,可被认为对轮椅使用者是可接受的。总之,除传统现浇混凝土之外的表面可用于行人通道,而不会增加振动暴露或降低推进效率。