1 The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
2 Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Qual Health Res. 2018 Jun;28(7):1145-1156. doi: 10.1177/1049732318759490. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
Hospital-based video-reflexive ethnography (VRE) is a collaborative visual methodology used by researchers and/or health professionals to understand, interpret, and optimize health professionals' work practices and patients' experiences. For more than a decade, the VRE methodology has spread throughout (research) institutions and hospitals internationally, and VRE has evolved and broadened. Different ways of doing VRE have implications for the role of the researcher. A thorough examination of the consequences for the researcher's position is the central focus of this article. We outline three typical styles of researcher engagement with VRE: clinalyst, affect-as-method, and planned obsolescence. We argue that by examining these different styles of doing VRE research, academic researchers can then critically review and carefully choose which styles of VRE research best meet the needs of their research questions, their field relationships, their disciplinary background, and the expectations of their clinical research collaborators.
基于医院的视频反思民族志(VRE)是一种由研究人员和/或卫生专业人员共同使用的视觉协作方法,用于了解、解释和优化卫生专业人员的工作实践和患者的体验。十多年来,VRE 方法已在国际上的(研究)机构和医院中传播开来,并且 VRE 已经发展和扩大。不同的 VRE 做法对研究人员的角色有影响。本文的核心重点是对研究人员地位的后果进行彻底审查。我们概述了研究人员参与 VRE 的三种典型风格:clinalyst、affect-as-method 和 planned obsolescence。我们认为,通过研究这些不同风格的 VRE 研究,学术研究人员可以批判性地审查并谨慎选择哪种风格的 VRE 研究最符合他们的研究问题、他们的领域关系、他们的学科背景以及他们的临床研究合作者的期望。