Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, University of Michigan, B1 132K Taubman Center, Michigan Medicine, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, 209 Victor Vaughan Building, 2054, 1111 E. Catherine St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2054.
Acad Radiol. 2018 May;25(5):599-609. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
Teaching and assessing trainees' professionalism now represents an explicit expectation for Accreditation Council Graduate Medical Education-accredited radiology programs. Challenges to meeting this expectation include variability in defining the construct of professionalism; limits of traditional teaching and assessment methods, used for competencies historically more prominent in medical education, for professionalism; and emerging expectations for credible and feasible professionalism teaching and assessment practices in the current context of health-care training and practice. This article identifies promising teaching resources and methods that can be used strategically to augment traditional teaching of the cognitive basis for professionalism, including role modeling, case-based scenarios, debriefing, simulations, narrative medicine (storytelling), guided discussions, peer-assisted learning, and reflective practice. This article also summarizes assessment practices intended to promote learning, as well as to inform how and when to assess trainees as their professional identities develop over time, settings, and autonomous practice, particularly in terms of measurable behaviors. This includes assessment tools (including mini observations, critical incident reports, and appreciative inquiry) for authentic assessment in the workplace; engaging multiple sources (self-, peer, other health professionals, and patients) in assessment; and intentional practices for trainees to take responsibility for seeking our actionable feedback and reflection. This article examines the emerging evidence of the feasibility and value added of assessment of medical competency milestones, including professionalism, coordinated by the Accreditation Council Graduate Medical Education in radiology and other medical specialties. Radiology has a strategic opportunity to contribute to scholarship and inform policies in professionalism teaching and assessment practices.
现在,教授和评估学员的专业精神是获得研究生医学教育认证委员会(Accreditation Council Graduate Medical Education)认可的放射学项目的明确要求。满足这一期望面临的挑战包括:专业精神的定义结构存在差异;传统的教学和评估方法存在局限性,这些方法曾用于历史上更突出的医学教育能力,但不适用于专业精神;以及在当前医疗保健培训和实践的背景下,对可信且可行的专业精神教学和评估实践的新期望。本文确定了一些有前途的教学资源和方法,可以战略性地用于增强专业精神认知基础的传统教学,包括角色扮演、基于案例的情景、辅导、模拟、叙事医学(讲故事)、引导讨论、同伴辅助学习和反思实践。本文还总结了旨在促进学习的评估实践,以及告知如何以及何时评估学员的专业身份如何随着时间的推移、在不同环境和自主实践中发展,特别是在可衡量的行为方面。这包括在工作场所进行真实评估的评估工具(包括迷你观察、关键事件报告和欣赏式探究);让多个来源(自我、同伴、其他卫生专业人员和患者)参与评估;以及让学员有意寻求可操作的反馈和反思的实践。本文探讨了评估放射学和其他医学专业医学能力里程碑(包括专业精神)的可行性和附加值的新证据,这些评估是由研究生医学教育认证委员会协调的。放射学有机会为专业精神教学和评估实践的学术研究做出贡献并为其提供信息。