• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Place recognition from distant landmarks: human performance and maximum likelihood model.

作者信息

Mallot Hanspeter A, Lancier Stephan

机构信息

Institute for Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

, Wettstetten, Germany.

出版信息

Biol Cybern. 2018 Aug;112(4):291-303. doi: 10.1007/s00422-018-0751-4. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00422-018-0751-4
PMID:29480375
Abstract

We present a simple behavioral experiment on human place recognition from a configuration of four visual landmarks. Participants were asked to navigate several paths, all involving a turn at one specific point, and while doing so incidentally learned the position of that turning point. In the test phase, they were asked to return to the turning point in a reduced environment leaving only the four landmarks visible. Results are compared to two versions of a maximum likelihood model of place recognition using either view-based or depth-based cues for place recognition. Only the depth-based model is in good qualitative agreement with the data. In particular, it reproduces landmark configuration-dependent effects of systematic bias and statistical error distribution as well as effects of approach direction. The model is based on a place code (depth and bearing of the landmarks at target location) and an egocentric working memory of surrounding space including current landmark position in a local, map-like representation. We argue that these elements are crucial for human place recognition.

摘要

相似文献

1
Place recognition from distant landmarks: human performance and maximum likelihood model.
Biol Cybern. 2018 Aug;112(4):291-303. doi: 10.1007/s00422-018-0751-4. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
2
Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach.提示可靠性和地标稳定性启发式决定了记忆引导的伸手过程中自我中心和他心视觉信息之间的相对权重。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;103(6):3054-69. doi: 10.1152/jn.01008.2009. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
3
Turn left where you felt unhappy: how affect influences landmark-based wayfinding.在你感到不开心的地方向左转:情绪如何影响基于地标的寻路。
Cogn Process. 2017 May;18(2):135-144. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0790-0. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
4
Seeing the forest before the trees-spatial orientation in freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro) in a hole-board task.从整体到局部——在洞板任务中淡水黄貂鱼(Potamotrygon motoro)的空间定向
Behav Processes. 2015 Oct;119:105-15. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
5
Gender differences in landmark learning for virtual navigation: the role of distance to a goal.虚拟导航中地标学习的性别差异:与目标距离的作用。
Behav Processes. 2011 Sep;88(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
6
Egocentric coding of space for incidentally learned attention: effects of scene context and task instructions.情境上下文和任务指令对偶然学习注意的空间以自我为中心的编码的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):233-50. doi: 10.1037/a0033870. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
7
Individual differences in cognitive map accuracy: Investigating the role of landmark familiarity.认知地图准确性的个体差异:探究地标熟悉度的作用。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Mar;73(1):37-46. doi: 10.1037/cep0000165.
8
Flexible learning and use of multiple-landmark information by pigeons (Columba livia) in a touch screen-based goal searching task.鸽子(家鸽)在基于触摸屏的目标搜索任务中对多种地标信息的灵活学习与运用。
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Aug;125(3):317-27. doi: 10.1037/a0023044.
9
One spatial map or many? Spatial coding of connected environments.一个还是多个空间图谱?连通环境的空间编码。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):511-531. doi: 10.1037/a0035259. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
10
Object recognition and location: Which component of object location memory for landmarks is affected by gender? Evidence from four to ten year-old children.物体识别与定位:地标性物体定位记忆的哪个组成部分会受到性别的影响?来自4至10岁儿童的证据。
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2020 Jan-Mar;9(1):31-40. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2018.1504218. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Human navigation strategies and their errors result from dynamic interactions of spatial uncertainties.人类的导航策略及其错误是由空间不确定性的动态相互作用产生的。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 6;15(1):5677. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49722-y.
2
Not seeing the forest for the trees: combination of path integration and landmark cues in human virtual navigation.只见树木,不见森林:人类虚拟导航中路径整合与地标线索的结合
Front Behav Neurosci. 2024 May 21;18:1399716. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1399716. eCollection 2024.
3
The Virtual Navigation Toolbox: Providing tools for virtual navigation experiments.
虚拟导航工具箱:提供虚拟导航实验工具。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0293536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293536. eCollection 2023.
4
No single, stable 3D representation can explain pointing biases in a spatial updating task.没有单一、稳定的 3D 表示形式可以解释在空间更新任务中的指向偏差。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 29;9(1):12578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48379-8.