Engelmann Ilka, Alidjinou Enagnon Kazali, Lazrek Mouna, Pouillaude Jean-Marie, Ogiez Judith, Rose François, Duhamel Alain, Dewilde Anny, Hober Didier
Université de Lille, Faculté de Médecine, CHU Lille, Laboratoire de Virologie EA3610, F-59000 Lille, France.
Université de Lille, CHU Lille, EA 2694 - Santé publique : épidémiologie et qualité des soins, F-59000 Lille, France.
J Med Microbiol. 2018 Apr;67(4):529-536. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000702. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
There are few data on the performance of automated Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) PCR assays. This study compared EBV quantification for the kPCR PLX EBV DNA (kPCR; Siemens, France) and the EBV R-gene (R-gene; Argene, Biomerieux, France) assays and their correlation with the World Health Organization (WHO) standard.
WHO International Standard for EBV (WHO standard) dilution panels in different matrices were submitted to nucleic acid extraction with Versant kPCR Molecular Systems SP followed by the kPCR assay, or to nucleic acid extraction with the MagNA Pure LC System or NucliSENS easyMag followed by the R-gene assay. Seventy-four clinical specimens were tested in both assays. Bland-Altman analysis and linear regression analysis were performed.
The correlation between the WHO standard diluted in different matrices and the R-gene and kPCR assays was good (R >0.96 and R >0.92, respectively). A matrix effect was observed. The correlation of quantitative results between both assays yielded a coefficient of determination R higher than 0.74. The quantification differences were within one log10 of the averaged results for 34 of the 38 specimens (89 %). Calibration to the WHO standard did not increase the comparability of quantitative results.
The quantitative results of both assays showed reasonable correlation with each other and a good correlation with the WHO standard.
关于自动化爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测性能的数据较少。本研究比较了kPCR PLX EBV DNA检测(kPCR;法国西门子公司)和EBV R基因检测(R基因;法国生物梅里埃公司的阿让公司)对EBV的定量分析及其与世界卫生组织(WHO)标准的相关性。
将不同基质中的WHO EBV国际标准(WHO标准)稀释板用Versant kPCR分子系统SP进行核酸提取,随后进行kPCR检测,或者用MagNA Pure LC系统或NucliSENS easyMag进行核酸提取,随后进行R基因检测。两种检测方法均对74份临床标本进行了检测。进行了Bland-Altman分析和线性回归分析。
在不同基质中稀释的WHO标准与R基因检测和kPCR检测之间的相关性良好(分别为R>0.96和R>0.92)。观察到基质效应。两种检测方法定量结果的相关性产生的决定系数R高于0.74。38份标本中的34份(89%)的定量差异在平均结果的1个log10范围内。根据WHO标准进行校准并未提高定量结果的可比性。
两种检测方法的定量结果相互之间显示出合理的相关性,并且与WHO标准具有良好的相关性。