• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤患者的用药安全:从处方到化疗给药流程中的核对程序映射。

Medication Safety in Oncology Care: Mapping Checking Procedures From Prescription to Administration of Chemotherapy.

机构信息

Swiss Patient Safety Foundation, Zurich; University Hospital of Basel, Basel; and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2018 Apr;14(4):e201-e210. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.026427. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.2017.026427
PMID:29481295
Abstract

PURPOSE

To increase medication safety in oncology, checking procedures are increasingly applied by nurses, physicians, and pharmacists. However, little is known about the number, types, and consistency of implemented checks. The aim of the study was to assess the number and types of different checking procedures that are performed along the lifecycle of a chemotherapy prescription across three hospitals, different care settings, administration routes, and professional groups.

METHODS

A scheme to evaluate checking procedures and a mapping approach to illustrate the checks along the phases of the medication process were developed. Checking procedures were assessed on the basis of analysis of internal guidelines and interviews with nurses and physicians who work on wards and in ambulatory infusion units of three hospitals.

RESULTS

There were considerable differences in number and type of checking procedures among administration routes, professional groups, wards and ambulatory infusion units, and hospitals. During the prescribing phase, the lowest number of checks was performed. In internal guidelines, checking procedures were documented poorly, though the pharmacy process was an exception.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the pharmacists, nurse and physician clinician checking procedures are less standardized within and across hospitals. The results point to different checking habits for the professional groups; for example, physicians would rather perform plausibility reviews than checks. Our evaluation scheme to categorize checks and the visualized mapping approach was feasible and understandable for practitioners.

摘要

目的

为了提高肿瘤学中的用药安全性,护士、医生和药剂师越来越多地采用核对程序。然而,对于实施的核对数量、类型和一致性知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估在三家医院、不同护理环境、给药途径和专业群体中,在化疗处方生命周期中执行的不同核对程序的数量和类型。

方法

制定了评估核对程序的方案和图示方法,以说明药物治疗过程各阶段的核对情况。根据对在三家医院的病房和门诊输液单元工作的护士和医生的内部指南分析和访谈,评估核对程序。

结果

给药途径、专业群体、病房和门诊输液单元以及医院之间的核对程序数量和类型存在相当大的差异。在处方阶段,执行的核对程序最少。内部指南中,核对程序记录不佳,但药房流程是个例外。

结论

与药剂师相比,护士和医生临床医生的核对程序在医院内和医院间的标准化程度较低。结果表明,不同专业群体有不同的核对习惯;例如,医生更愿意进行合理性审查而不是核对。我们的核对程序分类评估方案和可视化映射方法对于从业者来说是可行且易于理解的。

相似文献

1
Medication Safety in Oncology Care: Mapping Checking Procedures From Prescription to Administration of Chemotherapy.肿瘤患者的用药安全:从处方到化疗给药流程中的核对程序映射。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Apr;14(4):e201-e210. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.026427. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
2
Medication double-checking procedures in clinical practice: a cross-sectional survey of oncology nurses' experiences.临床实践中的用药双重核对程序:一项关于肿瘤护理人员经验的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 13;6(6):e011394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011394.
3
Oncology nurses' beliefs and attitudes towards the double-check of chemotherapy medications: a cross-sectional survey study.肿瘤专科护士对化疗药物双重核对的信念与态度:一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2937-9.
4
The impacts of a pharmacist-managed outpatient clinic and chemotherapy-directed electronic order sets for monitoring oral chemotherapy.药剂师管理的门诊诊所及用于监测口服化疗的化疗指导电子医嘱集的影响
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2017 Dec;23(8):582-590. doi: 10.1177/1078155216672314. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
5
What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies.双重检查程序实际上能检测到什么?对已识别的不一致情况进行观察性评估和定性分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e039291. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039291.
6
Chemotherapy regimen checks performed by pharmacists contribute to safe administration of chemotherapy.药剂师进行的化疗方案检查有助于化疗的安全给药。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2017 Jan;23(1):18-25. doi: 10.1177/1078155215614998. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
7
ReCAP: Comparison of Independent Error Checks for Oral Versus Intravenous Chemotherapy.ReCAP:口服与静脉化疗独立错误检查的比较。
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Feb;12(2):168-9; e180-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.005892. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
8
Paediatric nurses' adherence to the double-checking process during medication administration in a children's hospital: an observational study.儿童医院儿科护士在给药过程中对双重核对流程的遵守情况:一项观察性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jun;70(6):1404-13. doi: 10.1111/jan.12303. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
9
Improving the cancer chemotherapy use process.改善癌症化疗的使用流程。
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Dec;14(12):3148-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.12.3148.
10
Exploratory study to identify the process used by pharmacy staff to verify the accuracy of dispensed medicines.探索性研究,以确定药房工作人员用于核实所配发药品准确性的流程。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Aug;21(4):233-42. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00255.x. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies.双重检查程序实际上能检测到什么?对已识别的不一致情况进行观察性评估和定性分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e039291. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039291.
2
Electronic ordering and the management of treatment interdependencies: a qualitative study of paediatric chemotherapy.电子医嘱与治疗相互依存关系的管理:一项儿科化疗的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 14;20(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01212-z.
3
A new approach of assessing patient safety aspects in routine practice using the example of "doctors handwritten prescriptions".
采用“医生手写处方”为例评估常规实践中患者安全问题的新方法。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Apr;28(7-8):1242-1250. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14736. Epub 2019 Jan 7.