• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区社会经济地位对院外心脏骤停结局的差异:一项十年观察性研究。

A disparity in outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by community socioeconomic status: A ten-year observational study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Republic of Korea; Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Republic of Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University, Boramae Medical Center, Republic of Korea; Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.025. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.025
PMID:29481908
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the temporal trends in good neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) between communities with different socioeconomic status (SES).

METHODS

A nationwide, population-based observational study was conducted in adult patients with OHCA of cardiac etiology from 2006 to 2015. Community SES was defined using the Carstairs index categorized into 5 groups, from Q1 (the least deprived) to Q5 (the most deprived). Outcomes included good neurologic outcome, survival to hospital discharge and rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined temporal trends in risk-adjusted outcome rates according to community SES and estimated a difference-in-differences model between 2006 and 2015 to compare the changes over time in communities with different SES.

RESULTS

A total of 120,365 OHCAs met inclusion criteria. Risk-adjusted rates increased from 2006 to 2015 for bystander CPR (1.2%-23.2%), survival to discharge (3.0%-8.0%), and good neurological outcome (0.9%-5.8%). However, the degree of improvement in each risk-adjusted rate among SES groups were different. The communities with highest SES showed much greater improvement (bystander CPR 1.6%-34.6%; survival to discharge 3.5%-9.9%; and good neurological outcome 1.6%-7.4%) while less improvement in lower SES communities (1.6%-15.5%; 2.3%-6.2%; and 0.5%-4.2%, respectively). For rates of bystander CPR, the adjusted difference-in-differences value was statistically significant in highest SES communities, showing gradient from 11.48% increase in the lowest SES to 22.39% increase in the highest SES.

CONCLUSION

In Korea, both survival to hospital discharge and good neurologic outcomes after OHCA have improved during the past decade. However, disparity in outcomes was observed based on community socioeconomic status. Outcome improvements were greatest in communities with higher SES but relatively less in lower SES communities.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较不同社会经济地位(SES)社区之间院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后良好神经功能结局的时间趋势。

方法

这是一项全国性的基于人群的观察性研究,纳入了 2006 年至 2015 年期间心脏病因所致 OHCA 的成年患者。社区 SES 采用 Carstairs 指数定义,分为 5 组,从 Q1(最不贫困)到 Q5(最贫困)。结局包括良好的神经功能结局、出院时存活和旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)的比例。使用多变量逻辑回归,我们根据社区 SES 检查了风险调整结局率的时间趋势,并估计了 2006 年至 2015 年之间的差异差异模型,以比较不同 SES 社区的随时间变化。

结果

共纳入 120365 例 OHCA 符合纳入标准。旁观者 CPR(1.2%-23.2%)、出院存活率(3.0%-8.0%)和良好神经功能结局(0.9%-5.8%)的风险调整率从 2006 年到 2015 年有所增加。然而,SES 组中每个风险调整率的改善程度不同。SES 最高的社区显示出更大的改善(旁观者 CPR 1.6%-34.6%;出院存活率 3.5%-9.9%;和良好的神经功能结局 1.6%-7.4%),而 SES 较低的社区改善较小(1.6%-15.5%;2.3%-6.2%;和 0.5%-4.2%,分别)。对于旁观者 CPR 率,SES 最高社区的调整差异差异值具有统计学意义,显示从 SES 最低社区的增加 11.48%到 SES 最高社区的增加 22.39%的梯度。

结论

在韩国,OHCA 后住院存活率和良好的神经功能结局在过去十年中有所改善。然而,根据社区社会经济地位,观察到结局存在差异。SES 较高的社区的改善最大,但 SES 较低的社区的改善相对较少。

相似文献

1
A disparity in outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by community socioeconomic status: A ten-year observational study.社区社会经济地位对院外心脏骤停结局的差异:一项十年观察性研究。
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.025. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
2
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by trained responders versus lay persons and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A community observational study.训练有素的急救人员与非专业人员进行心肺复苏术与院外心脏骤停的结局:一项社区观察性研究。
Resuscitation. 2017 Sep;118:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
3
Timely bystander CPR improves outcomes despite longer EMS times.尽管紧急医疗服务(EMS)响应时间较长,但及时的旁观者心肺复苏术(CPR)仍能改善预后。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1049-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.02.033. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
4
A trend in epidemiology and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by urbanization level: a nationwide observational study from 2006 to 2010 in South Korea.城市化水平与院外心脏骤停的流行病学和结局趋势:韩国 2006 至 2010 年全国性观察研究。
Resuscitation. 2013 May;84(5):547-57. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
5
Socio-economic differences in incidence, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.社会经济差异对院外心脏骤停发生率、旁观者心肺复苏和生存的影响:系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2019 Aug;141:44-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
6
Text message alert system and resuscitation outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A before-and-after population-based study.短信提醒系统对院外心脏骤停复苏结局的影响:一项基于人群的前后对照研究。
Resuscitation. 2019 May;138:198-207. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.01.045. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
7
Effect of Dispatcher-Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Program and Location of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest on Survival and Neurologic Outcome.调度员辅助心肺复苏计划及院外心脏骤停地点对生存及神经学转归的影响
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;69(1):52-61.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
Effects of Dispatcher-assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Survival Outcomes in Infants, Children, and Adolescents with Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrests.调度员辅助心肺复苏对院外心脏骤停的婴儿、儿童和青少年生存结局的影响。
Resuscitation. 2016 Nov;108:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.08.026. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
Differential survival for men and women from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest varies by age: results from the OPALS study.院外心脏骤停患者中男性和女性的生存差异因年龄而异:OPALS研究结果
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;21(12):1503-11. doi: 10.1111/acem.12540.
10
Improvements in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival from 1998 to 2013.1998年至2013年院外心脏骤停生存率的改善情况。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):616-627. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1308604. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of a Community First Responder System for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Poland.波兰院外心脏骤停社区第一响应者系统的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 May 2;17:375-386. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S510907. eCollection 2025.
2
2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.《2025年心脏病和中风统计数据:美国心脏协会关于美国和全球数据的报告》
Circulation. 2025 Feb 25;151(8):e41-e660. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001303. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
Impact of socioeconomic status on cardiac arrest outcomes during COVID-19 pandemic.
新冠疫情期间社会经济地位对心脏骤停结局的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 19;10(20):e37904. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37904. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
4
Socioeconomic disadvantage and long-term survival duration in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: A population-based cohort study.院外心脏骤停患者的社会经济劣势与长期生存时间:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Mar 20;18:100610. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100610. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.2024 年心脏病与中风统计数据:美国心脏协会发布的美国和全球数据报告。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):e347-e913. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
6
Improving survival after cardiac arrest in Europe: The synergetic effect of rescue chain strategies.提高欧洲心脏骤停后的生存率:急救链策略的协同效应。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Dec 21;17:100533. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100533. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计数据-2023 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2023 Feb 21;147(8):e93-e621. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
8
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and bystander response by socioeconomic disadvantage in communities of New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州社区中,院外心脏骤停情况及社会经济劣势群体的旁观者反应。
Resusc Plus. 2022 Feb 6;9:100205. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100205. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Socio-spatial disparities in access to emergency health care-A Scandinavian case study.紧急医疗保健获取的社会空间差异——斯堪的纳维亚案例研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 10;16(12):e0261319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261319. eCollection 2021.
10
A national population-based study of patients, bystanders and contextual factors associated with resuscitation in witnessed cardiac arrest: insight from the french RéAC registry.一项基于全国人群的研究,探讨了目击心搏骤停患者、旁观者和相关环境因素与复苏之间的关系:来自法国 RéAC 注册研究的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;21(1):2202. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12269-4.