Suppr超能文献

比较概率样本和非概率样本中性少数和异性恋女性的物质使用和心理健康结果。

Comparing substance use and mental health outcomes among sexual minority and heterosexual women in probability and non-probability samples.

机构信息

School of Social Work San José State University, One Washington Square, San José, CA 95192-0124, United States.

Alcohol Research Group, 6001 Shellmound St, Suite 450, Emeryville CA 94608, United States.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Apr 1;185:285-292. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.12.036. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine similarities and differences in demographics and key substance use and mental health outcomes in a probability sample of heterosexual women and two samples of sexual minority women (SMW), one recruited using probability and the other using non-probability methods.

METHODS

Using data from four waves of the National Alcohol Survey (NAS; n = 315 SMW; 10,523 heterosexual women) and Wave 3 of the Chicago Health and Life Experiences of Women (CHLEW; n = 688 SMW) study, we examined hazardous drinking, drug use, tobacco use, depression, and help-seeking for alcohol or other drug problems.

RESULTS

Compared to SMW in the probability sample, SMW in the non-probability sample were older, more likely to be college educated, and more likely to be in a partnered relationship. Compared to heterosexuals, SMW in both the probability and non-probability samples had greater odds of past-year hazardous drinking, marijuana use, and other drug use. We found similar results for lifetime help-seeking for alcohol or drug problems, past week depression, and co-occurring hazardous drinking and depression. In comparisons with heterosexual women, the magnitude of difference for drug use was greater for the SMW non-probability sample; for tobacco use, the difference was greater for the SMW probability sample.

CONCLUSION

Given the difficulties recruiting probability samples of SMW, researchers will continue to use non-probability samples in the foreseeable future. Thus, understanding how findings may differ between probability and non-probability samples is critically important in advancing research on sexual-orientation-related health disparities.

摘要

目的

在异性恋女性的概率样本和两个性少数女性(SMW)样本中,研究人口统计学和关键物质使用和心理健康结果的相似性和差异,一个样本是通过概率方法招募的,另一个样本是通过非概率方法招募的。

方法

使用来自四次全国酒精调查(NAS;n=315 名 SMW;10523 名异性恋女性)和第三次芝加哥女性健康和生活经历调查(CHLEW;n=688 名 SMW)的数据,我们检查了危险饮酒、药物使用、吸烟、抑郁和寻求酒精或其他药物问题的帮助。

结果

与概率样本中的 SMW 相比,非概率样本中的 SMW 年龄较大,更有可能接受过大学教育,并且更有可能处于伴侣关系中。与异性恋者相比,概率样本和非概率样本中的 SMW 过去一年危险饮酒、大麻使用和其他药物使用的可能性更大。我们还发现,过去一年寻求酒精或药物问题帮助、过去一周抑郁以及同时存在危险饮酒和抑郁的终生可能性也存在相似的结果。与异性恋女性相比,非概率样本中药物使用的差异更大;对于烟草使用,概率样本的差异更大。

结论

鉴于招募 SMW 概率样本存在困难,在可预见的未来,研究人员将继续使用非概率样本。因此,了解概率样本和非概率样本之间的结果可能存在哪些差异,对于推进性取向相关健康差异的研究至关重要。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验