University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, London SE10 9LS, UK
London School of Economics, Houghton Street, WC2A 2AE London, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 19;373(1744). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0171.
Models and constructs of individual differences are numerous and diverse. But detecting commonalities, differences and interrelations is hindered by the common abstract terms (e.g. 'personality', 'temperament', 'traits') that do not reveal the particular phenomena denoted. This article applies a transdisciplinary paradigm for research on individuals that builds on complexity theory and epistemological complementarity. Its philosophical, metatheoretical and methodological frameworks provide concepts to differentiate various kinds of phenomena (e.g. physiology, behaviour, psyche, language). They are used to scrutinize the field's basic concepts and to elaborate methodological foundations for taxonomizing individual variations in humans and other species. This guide to developing comprehensive and representative models explores the decisions taxonomists must make about which individual variations to include, which to retain and how to model them. Selection and reduction approaches from various disciplines are classified by their underlying rationales, pinpointing possibilities and limitations. Analyses highlight that individuals' complexity cannot be captured by one universal model. Instead, multiple models phenotypically taxonomizing different kinds of variability in different kinds of phenomena are needed to explore their causal and functional interrelations and ontogenetic development that are then modelled in integrative and explanatory taxonomies. This research agenda requires the expertise of many disciplines and is inherently transdisciplinary.This article is part of the theme issue 'Diverse perspectives on diversity: multi-disciplinary approaches to taxonomies of individual differences'.
个体差异的模型和建构为数众多且多种多样。但是,由于常见的抽象术语(例如“个性”、“气质”、“特征”)并没有揭示出所表示的特定现象,因此检测共性、差异和相互关系受到了阻碍。本文应用了一种跨学科的个体研究范式,该范式基于复杂性理论和认识论互补性。其哲学、元理论和方法论框架提供了区分各种现象(例如生理学、行为、心理、语言)的概念。这些概念被用来仔细研究该领域的基本概念,并为人类和其他物种的个体变异进行分类学方法奠定基础。本指南旨在开发全面而有代表性的模型,探索分类学家在选择要包含的个体变异、保留哪些以及如何对其进行建模方面必须做出的决策。来自不同学科的选择和简化方法根据其基本原理进行分类,指出了可能性和局限性。分析强调,个体的复杂性不能用一个通用模型来捕捉。相反,需要多种模型来对不同现象中的不同类型的可变性进行表型分类,以探索它们的因果和功能关系以及发生发展,然后在综合和解释性分类中对其进行建模。这个研究议程需要许多学科的专业知识,并且本质上是跨学科的。本文是主题为“多样性的多种观点:个体差异的多学科分类方法”的一部分。