Medical Center of Diagnosis and Treatment for Cervical Diseases, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai 200011, China.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Mar 5;131(5):553-558. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.226057.
The effectiveness of an anti-incontinence procedure concomitant with prolapse reconstruction for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in preventing urinary incontinence (UI) after surgery remains controversial. Our study aimed to describe the incidence of pre- and postoperative UI for pelvic reconstructive surgery and evaluate the management of POP associated with UI.
A total of 329 patients who underwent total pelvic reconstruction between June 2009 and February 2015 at a single institution were identified. These patients were divided into two groups (Group A [Prolift reconstruction]: n = 190 and Group B [modified total pelvic reconstruction]: n = 139). Data regarding surgical procedures and patient demographic variables were recorded. Chi-square and Student's t-tests were used for two independent samples.
A total of 115 patients presented with UI preoperatively. The average follow-up time was 46.5 months, with 20 patients lost to follow-up (6.1%). The cure rates of stress UI (SUI), urgency UI (UUI), and mixed UI (MUI) were 51% (30/59), 80% (16/20), and 48% (14/29), respectively. The cure rate of UUI after total pelvic reconstruction (80% [16/20]) was higher than that of SUI (50.8% [30/59], χ = 5.219, P = 0.03), and the cure rate of MUI (48%, 14/29) was the lowest. The cure rate of patients with UI symptoms postoperatively was lower than that of those with symptoms preoperatively (9.1% [28/309] vs. 16.2% [50/309], χ = 7.101, P = 0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of UI postoperatively between Groups A and B (P > 0.05). The cure rate of SUI in patients undergoing tension-free vaginal tape-obturator was not higher than that in those who did not undergo the procedure (42.9% [6/14] vs. 53.3% [24/45], χ = 0.469, P = 0.49). There were no differences in the cure rate for POP or UI between these two types of reconstructions (P > 0.05).
No correlation between the incidence of UI and POP was identified. The results suggest that UI treatment should be performed after POP surgery for patients with both conditions.
抗失禁手术与脱垂重建联合应用于盆腔器官脱垂(POP)对预防术后尿失禁(UI)的效果仍存在争议。本研究旨在描述盆腔重建术后 UI 的发生率,并评估与 UI 相关的 POP 的治疗方法。
在一家机构中,我们共选取了 329 名于 2009 年 6 月至 2015 年 2 月期间接受全盆腔重建的患者。这些患者被分为两组(A 组[普罗菲尔德重建术]:n=190 例和 B 组[改良全盆腔重建术]:n=139 例)。记录手术过程和患者人口统计学变量的数据。采用卡方检验和学生 t 检验进行两组间的独立样本比较。
术前共有 115 例患者出现 UI。平均随访时间为 46.5 个月,20 例患者失访(6.1%)。压力性尿失禁(SUI)、急迫性尿失禁(UUI)和混合性尿失禁(MUI)的治愈率分别为 51%(30/59)、80%(16/20)和 48%(14/29)。全盆腔重建术后 UUI 的治愈率(80%[16/20])高于 SUI(50.8%[30/59],χ=5.219,P=0.03),MUI(48%,14/29)的治愈率最低。术后出现 UI 症状的患者治愈率低于术前(9.1%[28/309] vs. 16.2%[50/309],χ=7.101,P=0.01)。A 组和 B 组术后 UI 的发生率无差异(P>0.05)。行阴道无张力吊带-闭孔器术的 SUI 患者的治愈率并不高于未行该手术的患者(42.9%[6/14] vs. 53.3%[24/45],χ=0.469,P=0.49)。两种重建术式的 POP 或 UI 的治愈率无差异(P>0.05)。
UI 的发生率与 POP 无关。结果表明,对于同时患有两种疾病的患者,应在 POP 手术后再进行 UI 治疗。