Suppr超能文献

高级盆腔器官脱垂伴或不伴尿失禁患者全盆腔重建术前和术后的尿失禁管理。

Management of Urinary Incontinence before and after Total Pelvic Reconstruction for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse with and without Incontinence.

机构信息

Medical Center of Diagnosis and Treatment for Cervical Diseases, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai 200011, China.

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Mar 5;131(5):553-558. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.226057.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of an anti-incontinence procedure concomitant with prolapse reconstruction for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in preventing urinary incontinence (UI) after surgery remains controversial. Our study aimed to describe the incidence of pre- and postoperative UI for pelvic reconstructive surgery and evaluate the management of POP associated with UI.

METHODS

A total of 329 patients who underwent total pelvic reconstruction between June 2009 and February 2015 at a single institution were identified. These patients were divided into two groups (Group A [Prolift reconstruction]: n = 190 and Group B [modified total pelvic reconstruction]: n = 139). Data regarding surgical procedures and patient demographic variables were recorded. Chi-square and Student's t-tests were used for two independent samples.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients presented with UI preoperatively. The average follow-up time was 46.5 months, with 20 patients lost to follow-up (6.1%). The cure rates of stress UI (SUI), urgency UI (UUI), and mixed UI (MUI) were 51% (30/59), 80% (16/20), and 48% (14/29), respectively. The cure rate of UUI after total pelvic reconstruction (80% [16/20]) was higher than that of SUI (50.8% [30/59], χ = 5.219, P = 0.03), and the cure rate of MUI (48%, 14/29) was the lowest. The cure rate of patients with UI symptoms postoperatively was lower than that of those with symptoms preoperatively (9.1% [28/309] vs. 16.2% [50/309], χ = 7.101, P = 0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of UI postoperatively between Groups A and B (P > 0.05). The cure rate of SUI in patients undergoing tension-free vaginal tape-obturator was not higher than that in those who did not undergo the procedure (42.9% [6/14] vs. 53.3% [24/45], χ = 0.469, P = 0.49). There were no differences in the cure rate for POP or UI between these two types of reconstructions (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

No correlation between the incidence of UI and POP was identified. The results suggest that UI treatment should be performed after POP surgery for patients with both conditions.

摘要

背景

抗失禁手术与脱垂重建联合应用于盆腔器官脱垂(POP)对预防术后尿失禁(UI)的效果仍存在争议。本研究旨在描述盆腔重建术后 UI 的发生率,并评估与 UI 相关的 POP 的治疗方法。

方法

在一家机构中,我们共选取了 329 名于 2009 年 6 月至 2015 年 2 月期间接受全盆腔重建的患者。这些患者被分为两组(A 组[普罗菲尔德重建术]:n=190 例和 B 组[改良全盆腔重建术]:n=139 例)。记录手术过程和患者人口统计学变量的数据。采用卡方检验和学生 t 检验进行两组间的独立样本比较。

结果

术前共有 115 例患者出现 UI。平均随访时间为 46.5 个月,20 例患者失访(6.1%)。压力性尿失禁(SUI)、急迫性尿失禁(UUI)和混合性尿失禁(MUI)的治愈率分别为 51%(30/59)、80%(16/20)和 48%(14/29)。全盆腔重建术后 UUI 的治愈率(80%[16/20])高于 SUI(50.8%[30/59],χ=5.219,P=0.03),MUI(48%,14/29)的治愈率最低。术后出现 UI 症状的患者治愈率低于术前(9.1%[28/309] vs. 16.2%[50/309],χ=7.101,P=0.01)。A 组和 B 组术后 UI 的发生率无差异(P>0.05)。行阴道无张力吊带-闭孔器术的 SUI 患者的治愈率并不高于未行该手术的患者(42.9%[6/14] vs. 53.3%[24/45],χ=0.469,P=0.49)。两种重建术式的 POP 或 UI 的治愈率无差异(P>0.05)。

结论

UI 的发生率与 POP 无关。结果表明,对于同时患有两种疾病的患者,应在 POP 手术后再进行 UI 治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fca/5850671/1d81fe7bafcf/CMJ-131-553-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验