Otermin-Cristeta Solange, Hautzinger Martin
a Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy , Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany.
J Prev Interv Community. 2018 Apr-Jun;46(2):171-183. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2016.1198169.
The main goal of this study was the development of a reliable intervention to overcome general procrastination orientated to college students, designed to be used in practical clinical work. The workshops involved six meetings based on behavioral and cognitive techniques, paradox intervention, and psychoeducation. 175 students participated voluntarily. Their procrastination levels were measured in a pretest, post-test, and a 3-month follow-up. After the first interview, the participants were randomly divided into three groups (Intervention A, Intervention B, and a control group with no intervention). There was a significant improvement after the intervention. After 3 months, the average score was still significantly lower than in the pretest, whereas the score of the control group remained unchanged. The participants in Workshop A scored significantly lower in the post-test than the ones in Workshop B. After 3 months, the participants in Workshop B scored significantly lower in the follow up. So both interventions resulted to be effective in reducing procrastination sustainably.
本研究的主要目标是开发一种可靠的干预措施,以克服大学生普遍存在的拖延问题,该措施旨在用于实际临床工作。这些工作坊包括基于行为和认知技巧、悖论干预及心理教育的六次会议。175名学生自愿参与。在预测试、后测试及3个月的随访中对他们的拖延水平进行了测量。在首次访谈后,参与者被随机分为三组(干预组A、干预组B和无干预的对照组)。干预后有显著改善。3个月后,平均得分仍显著低于预测试,而对照组的得分保持不变。干预组A的参与者在后测试中的得分显著低于干预组B的参与者。3个月后,干预组B的参与者在随访中的得分显著降低。因此,两种干预措施在持续减少拖延方面均有效。