Grunschel Carola, Patrzek Justine, Klingsieck Katrin B, Fries Stefan
a Department of Psychology , Bielefeld University , Bielefeld , Germany.
b Student Counselling Centre , Bielefeld University , Bielefeld , Germany.
J Prev Interv Community. 2018 Apr-Jun;46(2):143-157. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2016.1198166.
Academic procrastination is considered to be a result of self-regulation failure having detrimental effects on students' well-being and academic performance. In the present study, we developed and evaluated a group training that aimed to reduce academic procrastination. We based the training on a cyclical process model of self-regulated learning, thus, focusing on improving deficient processes of self-regulated learning among academic procrastinators (e.g., time management, dealing with distractions). The training comprised five sessions and took place once a week for 90 min in groups of no more than 10 students. Overall, 106 students completed the training. We evaluated the training using a comprehensive control group design with repeated measures (three points of measurement); the control group was trained after the intervention group's training. The results showed that our training was successful. The trained intervention group significantly reduced academic procrastination and improved specific processes of self-regulated learning (e.g., time management, concentration), whereas the untrained control group showed no change regarding these variables. After the control group had also been trained, the control group also showed the expected favorable changes. The students rated the training overall as good and found it recommendable for procrastinating friends. Hence, fostering self-regulatory processes in our intervention was a successful attempt to support students in reducing academic procrastination. The evaluation of the training encourages us to adapt the training for different groups of procrastinators.
学业拖延被认为是自我调节失败的结果,会对学生的幸福感和学业成绩产生不利影响。在本研究中,我们开发并评估了一种旨在减少学业拖延的团体培训。我们的培训基于自我调节学习的循环过程模型,因此,重点在于改善学业拖延者自我调节学习中存在缺陷的过程(例如,时间管理、应对干扰)。培训共五节课程,每周进行一次,每次90分钟,每组不超过10名学生。总共有106名学生完成了培训。我们采用综合对照组设计并进行重复测量(三个测量点)来评估培训效果;对照组在干预组培训结束后进行培训。结果表明我们的培训是成功的。接受培训的干预组显著减少了学业拖延,并改善了自我调节学习的具体过程(例如,时间管理、注意力集中),而未接受培训的对照组在这些变量上没有变化。对照组接受培训后,也出现了预期的良好变化。学生们对培训的总体评价较好,并认为值得向有拖延问题的朋友推荐。因此,在我们的干预中培养自我调节过程是帮助学生减少学业拖延的一次成功尝试。对培训的评估鼓励我们针对不同类型的拖延者调整培训内容。